Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.31T
Market Cap
$2.31T
24h Trading Volume
$70.34B
BTC Dominance
56.22%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
South Korea to Overhaul Crypto Rulebook with Unified Digital Asset Act — 22% Tax Fight Looms
South Korea is moving toward a major rewrite of its crypto rulebook — even as a political fight brews over a planned 22% tax on digital-asset gains. What’s happening - The Financial Services Commission (FSC) told the National Assembly it will work with the ruling Democratic Party to draft a consolidated Digital Asset Basic Act. The government-backed framework, previewed ahead of a July 29 policy briefing, is intended to unify and replace parts of the patchwork of bills now before lawmakers. - At the same time, the National Assembly’s Finance and Economic Planning Committee was set to table an opposition amendment aimed at scrapping the cryptocurrency income tax slated to start on Jan. 1, 2027. Neither the consolidated bill nor the repeal motion changes current law yet. Scope of the proposed law The FSC says the consolidated bill would: - Create rules for issuing and circulating stablecoins (including who may issue them); - Define digital asset businesses and regulate their conduct; - Set exchange entry requirements, disclosure rules, internal controls and resilience measures to protect users and keep trading systems reliable. Why this matters South Korea already has the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, which focuses mainly on custody, unfair trading and retail safeguards. The Digital Asset Basic Act is intended as a second-stage law to broaden oversight — covering issuers, service providers and market structure in ways the earlier law does not. Points of contention Several unresolved issues will likely determine the final shape of the bill: - Stablecoin issuer ownership: A key debate is whether won-backed stablecoins must be issued by bank-led consortiums holding at least 50% plus one share. The FSC says issuer ownership rules are not yet final. - Role of banks vs. non-bank issuers: The Bank of Korea supports giving banks a leading role, citing monetary and financial stability concerns, and favors a statutory inter-agency body. Industry groups and some lawmakers instead want licensed, reserve-backed non-bank issuers to be allowed. - Exchange ownership caps and internal controls: Lawmakers must also decide whether to cap exchange shareholdings and tighten internal controls, cybersecurity standards and compensation mechanisms. Legislative process and timeline - Ten separate digital asset and stablecoin bills are already pending in the National Assembly. The FSC plans to coordinate a single government–ruling party proposal that could become the primary negotiating text. - FSC Chairman Lee Eog-weon has signaled an ambition to complete digital asset legislation in 2026 and to strengthen anti-money-laundering rules for stablecoins. - The FSC has not yet finalized the bill wording or announced a filing date. unresolved stablecoin ownership and exchange-shareholding rules are expected to be central negotiation points. The tax battle - Opposition People Power Party lawmaker Song Eon-seok introduced bill 2217609 on March 19 to remove the Income Tax Act provision that taxes income from transferring or lending digital assets. Critics say it’s unfair to tax ordinary crypto investors while most retail stock gains remain tax-exempt. - Under current law, annual crypto gains above 2.5 million won will be taxed at 20% nationally plus a 2% local tax — a combined 22% — starting Jan. 1, 2027. That start date has already been postponed three times since the tax was first scheduled to begin in 2022. - The ruling party and the government support implementing the tax. Tax authorities say the National Tax Service is preparing guidance and has created a unit focused on digital assets. A separate public petition to repeal the tax has gathered more than 50,000 signatures and awaits committee review. Next steps and likely outcomes - The FSC must finish consultations with the ruling party and other authorities before submitting its consolidated bill. If filed, the new government text would be reviewed alongside the ten existing proposals. - The tax-repeal amendment is expected to go to the Finance and Economic Planning Committee’s tax subcommittee, while the public petition goes to a petitions subcommittee — but neither panel had been fully constituted as of the July 29 notice and no review dates were set. - Unless a repeal passes or another delay is approved, the 22% crypto tax remains scheduled to take effect on Jan. 1, 2027. Market impact So far there are no verified links between these legislative developments and any direct, sustained crypto-market price moves. The outcome of stablecoin ownership rules and the tax fight, however, could have significant implications for issuers, exchanges and retail investors in South Korea. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Tether, Nairobi Securities Exchange sign MoU to explore tokenized securities, USDT settlement
Tether and the Nairobi Securities Exchange signed an exploratory memorandum of understanding on July 28 to study tokenized securities, blockchain-based market infrastructure and digital asset education in Kenya — a move that could reshape how securities are issued, traded and settled if regulators and market participants sign off. What the deal covers - The MoU focuses on Hadron, Tether’s tokenization platform, and sets out to evaluate fractional access to NSE-listed instruments for local and diaspora investors, onboarding and compliance workflows aligned with Kenyan AML/KYC rules, and potential uses of USDT as a settlement layer “where permitted.” - The agreement also includes training and workshops for NSE-listed brokers and retail investors, and a review of instant and atomic settlement models that Tether says could simplify the exchange’s multi-stage settlement process. Important caveats — this is exploratory - The MoU does not approve any specific tokenized security, launch a trading platform, or commit the NSE to settle trades in USDT. No pilot date, budget or binding implementation timeline was announced. - Hadron is described by Tether as software that provides issuance, transfer and compliance tools — not the issuer or guarantor of tokens. That means legal and operational responsibilities would still rest with the NSE, issuers, custodians and licensed intermediaries before any product reaches investors. - Tether and the NSE have not identified which securities might be tokenized, which blockchain would be used, or who would custody the underlying assets. They also haven’t explained how blockchain records would integrate with Kenya’s existing central depository and ownership systems. Regulatory backdrop matters - Kenya’s Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP) Act took effect Nov. 4, 2025. It places tokenization and token issuance platforms under the Capital Markets Authority (CMA), while the Central Bank of Kenya oversees stablecoin issuance. The law requires licensing, AML controls, tech safeguards and approval for covered virtual asset offerings. - Draft implementing regulations were published by the National Treasury in March 2026 and remain drafts with the CMA. The Act explicitly allows rules covering tokenized assets, real-world asset tokenization and stablecoins — meaning any NSE pilot will hinge on how regulators classify and authorize these activities. - The MoU’s phrasing that USDT could be used “where permitted” is significant: it does not imply regulatory approval for using USDT as a securities settlement instrument in Kenya. No CMA or central bank signoff accompanied the announcement. Context and scale - This is not the NSE’s first foray into blockchain. In 2025 the exchange joined DeFi Technologies, Valour and SovFi to develop the Kenya Digital Exchange for tokenized equities, debt, funds and commodities. - Tether introduced Hadron in 2024 to expand beyond stablecoins; the platform supports tokenization of corporate equity, bonds, commodities and sovereign debt with configurable compliance controls. - To provide market context: RWA.xyz tracked about $36.9 billion of tokenized real-world assets (excluding stablecoins) as of July 27, and USDT’s market capitalization was near $184 billion on July 29. Those figures illustrate the broader market’s size but don’t prove demand for tokenized Kenyan securities. Next steps and outstanding questions - Likely next steps include selecting pilot assets, defining ownership and custody arrangements, designing investor disclosures, and securing regulatory clearance. Other unresolved items are settlement finality, redemption rights, data protection, taxation and treatment of local vs. diaspora investors. - The MoU does not set deadlines for these steps. Until regulators approve structures and technical specifications are published, the agreement should be seen as a framework to study tokenization and settlement — not a live market launch. NSE CEO Frank Mwiti framed the partnership as aligning with the exchange’s 2025–2029 strategy to prioritize technology, market participation and investor access, stressing that the work is exploratory rather than a confirmed rollout. For participants and observers, the coming months will be about regulatory clarity and concrete pilot decisions that could determine whether tokenized securities move from concept to Kenyan reality. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Bitcoin’s $66K Bounce Looks Like a Bull Trap as Fed Risk-Off Sparks $670M Liquidations
Headline: Bitcoin’s Recent Bounce Looks Like a Classic Bull Trap as Global Risk-Off Takes Hold Markets opened in the red and then accelerated into a rout. South Korea’s KOSPI plunged more than 8% at the open, tripped a circuit breaker, and sent a risk-off shockwave across global markets before New York desks were fully awake. Crypto felt the pain fast: Bitcoin slid to $62,684 in early trade, briefly clawed back, then stalled. Decrypt’s morning snapshot showed BTC at $63,400 (down 2.7%), Ethereum at $1,875 (-4.2%) and Solana at $73 (-4.4%). In the past 24 hours more than $670 million in crypto positions were liquidated—about $533 million of that from leveraged longs—what you get when too many traders bet on a rally that never held. Traditional markets weren’t spared: oil dropped ~2%, gold dipped ~1%, and Nasdaq futures turned red as memory-chip stocks faltered. Underpinning much of the caution is the Federal Open Market Committee meeting running today and tomorrow, with Fed Chair Kevin Warsh slated to hold a press conference on July 29. Markets broadly expect the Fed to hold rates at 3.50–3.75%, but traders remain jittery after Warsh’s June presser boosted odds of further hikes and sent 2-year Treasury yields sharply higher. The result: many players are deleveraging rather than weathering the event. Why the Bitcoin bounce is probably a trap Earlier in the session a push toward $66,921 briefly rekindled optimism—some traders pointed to the 200-day exponential moving average (EMA) holding as evidence the bull run could resume. But a deeper read of the charts tells a different story. - Short-term damage: Between Monday and Tuesday BTC gave back the prior week’s gains, wiping out the recent bullish run and returning to the territory that looked bearish before the bounce. - Longer-term structure: On the daily chart stretching back to September 2025, price has traded well below the Ichimoku cloud and the 200-day average for months. Green weeks appear, get sold, and the downtrend resumes. - Parallel resistances: The current resistance mirrors prior lines that marked the May–July decline. Three bearish resistance lines (from Nov 2025–Apr, May–Jul, and the current one) form a parallel, consistent downtrend. - EMAs and the “death cross”: The 50 EMA sits below the 200 EMA and price is under both—classic death-cross territory that’s been in place for months, signaling a structurally weak trend. - Momentum readings: The RSI sits at 46.5—below 50 and leaning bearish, but not oversold enough (
XRP Slumps as Clarity Act Is Shelved and Fed Jitters Squeeze Crypto
XRP slid as crypto markets wrestle with a sour macro backdrop and fading hopes for a key legislative boost. Why markets are jittery - The new Fed chair, Kevin Warsh, is widely expected to hold the policy rate at 3.50%–3.75% at his second FOMC meeting, but recent CME FedWatch data pushed the odds of another hike as high as 38% last weekend — the strongest odds of this tightening cycle. Even a “hawkish hold” can spook risk assets. - Bitcoin is stuck around $63,400–$64,000, well under its June highs near $80,000, leaving altcoins to bear the brunt of risk-off flows. What happened to the Clarity Act — and why it matters for XRP - XRP briefly rallied in July after reports on July 21 said President Donald Trump had agreed to the Clarity Act’s long-stalled ethics provision. The token jumped about 3.25% to $1.1485, and Polymarket briefly put Senate passage odds at 43%. - That momentum faded when the Senate formally shelved the Clarity Act to prioritize a Russia sanctions bill and federal nominations. The chamber’s August recess starts around August 7, leaving a narrow window for a floor vote this year. Miss that window and a meaningful legislative chance could be delayed until late 2026 — and possibly into 2027, given the post-recess legislative calendar. - Why this matters: the Clarity Act would codify XRP’s status as a commodity. That legal certainty is the linchpin institutional custodians, banks and ETF issuers need to build products around the token. Without it, conditional bullish scenarios — like Standard Chartered’s $8 XRP target, which depends on full Senate passage plus $4–$8 billion in new ETF inflows — remain theoretical. Price and technical snapshot - Current price (Binance): $1.0641, market cap ~ $65 billion. 24-hour range: $1.0450–$1.0679. - Longer-term context: XRP peaked near $3.40 in mid-2025 and has been trading in a descending channel since, logging lower highs and lower lows. - ADX: 11.2 — one of the weakest readings all summer. An ADX under 25 signals no confirmed trend; readings below 20 often mean choppy, directionless conditions where false breakouts and stop hunts are common. Decrypt flagged an ADX of 13.3 on July 16, and the token has mostly been in this limbo through July. - Directional indicators: DI- (bearish) is beginning to rotate toward DI+ (bullish pressure), a modest constructive sign, but not decisive. - Moving averages: 50-day EMA sits below the 200-day EMA — a classic “death cross” that points to a continued medium-term downtrend since the $3.65 all-time high. - RSI: 40.9 — below neutral but not in deeply oversold territory that typically draws aggressive bargain hunters. - Fibonacci levels: the current bearish leg runs from $1.1646 down to $1.0450. If that breaks, next supports sit near $1.0125 and $0.9711. What could move XRP next Two catalysts will likely determine direction in the near term: 1) The Fed meeting — If Chair Warsh delivers a dovish hold or hints at cuts in September, crypto could get a relief pop and XRP may test the $1.10–$1.12 zone. If the statement is hawkish or shows dissent, the sell-off could extend toward $1.01 and then $0.97. 2) The Clarity Act — Legislative progress is the longer-term institutional catalyst. If a floor vote doesn’t happen before the August recess, the window for passage this year narrows dramatically, delaying the legal clarity institutional players need. Bottom line Technically and fundamentally, XRP’s case argues for patience. Low ADX, negative momentum on volatility indicators, and a persistent death cross suggest the market can stay compressed and choppy longer than many expect. Short-term bounces are possible, but without a macro pivot or a legislative surprise, they may be selling opportunities rather than the start of a sustained recovery. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Zcash Activates Ironwood: Retires Orchard, Traps Possible Counterfeit ZEC
Zcash flips the switch on Ironwood upgrade after counterfeit scare Weeks after a critical vulnerability rattled markets and raised questions about Zcash’s supply integrity, the privacy-focused cryptocurrency has activated Ironwood — an upgrade intended to ensure any counterfeit coins can never enter circulation. What changed - Ironwood retires the Orchard shielded pool — the private layer that held roughly 3.7 million ZEC (about $1.7 billion at current prices) — and begins migrating users into a newly designed shielded pool. - The upgrade implements a “turnstile” accounting system that prevents more ZEC from leaving the old pool than can be verifiably tracked as having been deposited, meaning any counterfeit coins (if they exist) would be trapped and unusable. - Ironwood also brings quantum-resistant transaction records and a formally verified proof circuit aimed at reducing the risk of similar cryptographic bugs in the future, while preserving Zcash’s privacy guarantees. How we got here The chain of events began in May when security researcher Taylor Hornby — reportedly using Claude Opus 4.8 — discovered a four-year-old flaw in Orchard that could have allowed an attacker to create counterfeit ZEC. Developers issued an emergency patch in June, but because shielded transactions are designed to hide transaction details, there was no way to prove whether the flaw had ever been exploited. That uncertainty spooked markets: Zcash plunged about 38% as investors questioned whether the coin’s supply could be trusted. In response, Zcash founder Zooko Wilcox proposed Ironwood, replacing Orchard with the new model plus the turnstile accounting fix. News of the proposal triggered a partial recovery in early June, recouping roughly $2.5 billion in market value. Today ZEC trades around $464, with a market capitalization close to $8 billion. Deployment and safeguards By July developers completed extensive testing and coordinated with exchanges, wallets, and mining pools to prepare for the upgrade. With Ironwood now live, those coordinated preparations are intended to minimize disruption and ensure the migration proceeds smoothly. Privacy concerns and migration advice Not everyone is fully satisfied. Privacy infrastructure provider Nym warned that the migration process creates a temporary privacy risk. Under normal use, shielded ZEC transactions don’t reveal amounts to a user’s wallet server, limiting exposure; Nym says Ironwood changes that because every holder must move funds into the new shielded pool. Users who migrate without extra protections could inadvertently link their IP address to wallet balances. “Under normal use, your shielded ZEC transactions don't reveal amounts to your wallet server, so your network exposure is limited. Ironwood changes that,” Nym said in a blog post. Zcash developers have counseled users not to rush the migration and to use privacy tools — such as Tor or NymVPN — while moving funds to reduce the chance of deanonymization. Bottom line Ironwood is Zcash’s decisive technical response to a high-stakes vulnerability: it retires the affected shielded pool, traps any potential counterfeit coins, and adds cryptographic hardening. The upgrade should restore confidence in supply integrity, but the migration phase requires care from users to avoid temporary privacy trade-offs. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Claude Opus 5 Built a Playable FPS From a 3‑Paragraph Prompt — What It Means for Crypto Gaming
Quick take: two days after Anthropic shipped Claude Opus 5, an AI investor posted a jaw-dropping demo — a fully playable first‑person shooter the model reportedly wrote by itself. The kicker: the prompt that produced it was three short paragraphs, and the finished game used no external assets. For crypto devs and on‑chain gaming projects, this is a glimpse of how AI could radically speed up game prototyping, auto‑generate assets, and change where human labor is focused — but it’s also a reminder to be wary of training‑data overlap and provenance issues. What happened - Matt Shumer (AI investor and former HyperWrite CEO) shared a video showing Claude Opus 5 building a browser-playable FPS. His tweet: “Claude Opus 5 one‑shotted this game,” and he insisted not a single external asset was used. - The entire prompt — published on GitHub — was just three short paragraphs. It asked Opus 5 to build a shooter at Call of Duty quality, spawn subagents (each with isolated memory and a narrow role), and loop each task through a harsh critic until the output beat real Call of Duty footage in blind, side‑by‑side tests. The brief demanded the result be “utterly perfect.” How the prompt diverged from conventional wisdom - Traditional prompt engineering emphasizes explicit, measurable criteria ("say what ‘good’ means") rather than evocative adjectives like “AAA.” Shumer’s approach did almost the opposite: he told subagents to be “utterly wowed” and left the exact definition of quality to an internal critic. - He calls this structure the “Gauntlet Loop”: give an agent a concrete, inspectable bar, let it split work into small tasks, and have an independent critic judge each piece — without inheriting the builder’s internal rationale. Claude Code features that enabled this - Subagents: spawned in isolated context windows with their own instructions and tool access, preventing critics from being biased by a builder’s internal reasoning. - Ultracode: a high‑effort Claude Code setting that allows the model to design an orchestration plan and fan work across up to 16 agents (1,000 agents max per run). - /loop skill: Anthropic’s built‑in repeated fix‑test‑adjust mechanism that kept the process iterating past “good enough.” Shumer didn’t cap the number of rounds; the critic kept naming gaps and the builder chased them for hours. The build itself - Runs on Three.js and plain WebGL2. - About 55,000 lines of code across 11 subsystems. - Every texture, mesh, animation, and sound is generated in the browser at load time — no downloaded models, HDRIs, images, or audio files. - Shumer’s critic log shows the score rising from 3.59/10 to just above 5, but he notes the real Call of Duty footage still won every logged round. Copycats and follow‑ups - Skeptics suspected hidden human coding. Shumer published the prompt and codebase to rebut that claim. - James Altucher ran the same prompt on Opus 5, reporting “a little over ten hours” and about 1.3 million tokens used; his build, Operation Blackout, is playable in the browser. - Rich (Atom Tan Studio) ran the same request against OpenAI’s GPT‑5.6 top tier (Sol 5.6 Ultra) and posted his results. - Leon Lin tried the opposite route: a long, 20‑section prompt specifying systems down to ragdoll physics and shadow maps, run on Opus 5 without subagents or ultracode. The result, Dust Corridor, is also a functioning browser shooter. - None of the follow‑up builds underwent Shumer’s blind comparison test with Call of Duty footage. Why skepticism still matters - The genre is heavily documented: Three.js ships pointer‑lock camera examples, and the mouse‑look/WASD/raycast pattern has been tutorialized and forked for years. A model trained on public code likely saw hundreds or thousands of near‑identical shooters during training. - Researchers call this “data contamination”: a model succeeds because similar examples existed in its training data, not necessarily because it reasoned something novel. None of the published builds includes a contamination check. - That means “built from scratch” is a weaker claim than headlines might suggest. The results still demonstrate a powerful agentic coding workflow, but in a well‑trodden genre. What this means for crypto and on‑chain gaming - Faster prototyping: Generative agents could cut months from early development cycles, letting studios and indie teams iterate game mechanics and UIs quickly. - Asset generation and cost efficiency: If models can create playable assets at load time, projects that tokenize or mint on‑chain items (NFTs) may rethink where and how assets are produced and verified. - New tooling for devs: Agentic coding with subagents and critic loops points to automated QA, iterative balancing, and continuous refactoring — useful for live‑service games and on‑chain game logic. - Intellectual property, provenance, and licensing headaches: Data contamination concerns translate into legal and authenticity risks for minted or monetized assets. Crypto projects will need provenance, audits, and possibly on‑chain attestations to reassure users and marketplaces. - Security and auditability: Auto‑generated game code and assets still require manual review and security checks, particularly if assets interact with smart contracts or wallets. Bottom line Claude Opus 5’s demo and the rapid replication attempts show how agentic coding can produce compelling, playable games with surprisingly terse prompts. For the crypto gaming ecosystem, that’s both an opportunity (faster builds, cheaper asset creation) and a cautionary tale (provenance, contamination, and the need for stronger audits). Read Shumer’s Gauntlet Loop as a promising architecture for AI‑assisted development — but not as definitive proof that an AI conjured a AAA game entirely from first principles. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news