Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.31T
Market Cap
$2.31T
24h Trading Volume
$70.34B
BTC Dominance
56.22%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Blockaid: Record $1.1B in H1 2026 Crypto Losses as Attackers Shift Off‑Chain
Crypto losses hit record $1.1B in H1 2026 as attackers move off-chain, Blockaid finds Crypto security breaches cost the industry roughly $1.1 billion across 212 verified incidents in the first half of 2026, a new Blockaid report published July 28 shows. The six-month toll is a record for the firm — Blockaid verified more exploits in H1 2026 than it did for the entire year of 2025 — and the incident count was 3.4 times Blockaid’s 2025 total. A major theme: attackers are increasingly targeting people and infrastructure rather than just buggy smart-contract code. Operational-security failures — compromised devices, stolen credentials, private keys, signing systems and poisoned off-chain infrastructure — accounted for 74% of the stolen value. One cluster of attacks that Blockaid tied to the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea accounted for about 55% of total losses. Why this matters: when attackers control valid credentials or signing systems, they can produce seemingly legitimate on-chain transactions that code audits alone cannot stop. Blockaid says that shift has produced new attack vectors in H1 and warned some could expand in H2. Network and incident highlights - Ethereum-linked projects lost about $332 million. Much of that was tied to code vulnerabilities, but the single largest Ethereum-linked case was KelpDAO: attackers released 116,500 rsETH (roughly $292 million) from a bridge contract by falsifying a source-chain message. Chainalysis linked the April 18 KelpDAO breach to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. KelpDAO completed an operational phase of its recovery plan on May 25 — transferring a final 20,373.72 rsETH into its bridge adapter — and resumed minting, redemptions and rewards, although litigation and disputed claims over frozen funds remain unresolved. - Solana-related projects lost roughly $326 million. More than 98% of those losses, Blockaid found, came from compromised keys and signing infrastructure rather than smart-contract bugs. Drift Protocol and Step Finance were the biggest contributors to that total; smaller code-related incidents hit projects such as Raydium and Volo. - The report stresses that network totals don’t demonstrate an inherent safety difference between blockchains — they reflect which applications were targeted, how teams managed privileged access, and whether a single large incident skewed a six-month total. Notable attacks and recoveries - Drift: A privileged-access assault on April 1 used months of social engineering and pre-signed durable-nonce transactions to seize administrative control, according to Chainalysis. Drift’s April 16 recovery update valued stolen assets at $295.7 million (higher than some early estimates used by Blockaid). Drift has proposed a recovery pool backed by exchange revenue, Tether (up to $127.5 million proposed), $20 million from other partners and a transferable recovery token. The protocol said relaunch would require independent audits (OtterSec and Asymmetric), dedicated signing devices, timelocks and a redesigned multisig. The theft remains an active on-chain case: a wallet tied to the exploiter moved 23,095.1 ETH (about $44.4 million) into Tornado Cash between July 23–24 after roughly three months of dormancy. - Step Finance: Executive devices were compromised and treasury-controlled assets of up to $40 million were drained. The team recovered about $4.7 million but ultimately shut down after financing and acquisition discussions failed to produce a sustainable path forward. Blockaid’s recommendations and what to watch in H2 Blockaid expects teams to prioritize operational controls that address these non-code attack vectors. Key mitigations the firm recommends include: - Transaction-intent checks to detect and block suspicious authorized transactions - Isolated, hardware-backed signing devices and stricter key segregation - Stronger monitoring and attestation across bridges, RPC nodes and other off-chain infrastructure Blockaid cautions that these are safeguards, not guarantees. Upcoming events likely to generate the next verified updates include Drift’s recovery-token terms and relaunch timetable, Step Finance’s remaining claims process, ongoing court proceedings tied to frozen KelpDAO funds, and any public asset seizures by law-enforcement agencies. Bottom line: H1 2026 shows a clear shift in attacker strategy toward compromising people and infrastructure to obtain valid signing power. That evolution reduces the protective value of traditional audits and forces on-chain teams to invest more heavily in operational security, key custody, and cross‑infrastructure monitoring going into H2. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
ARK: Crypto Faces Deepest Consolidation as Two Apps Capture 67% of App Revenue
ARK Invest researcher warns of accelerating crypto consolidation as revenue concentrates Lorenzo Valente, ARK Invest’s director of digital assets research, warned on July 28 that crypto is entering its deepest consolidation phase yet: capital and revenue are flowing toward a small number of firms while many projects, exchanges and teams face closures, restructurings or sale. Valente said two apps — Hyperliquid and Pump.fun — together account for 67% of application revenue, and that adding Ethena pushes the top-three share to nearly 80%. He expects more mergers and acquisitions, Chapter 11 filings, shutdowns and talent-focused hires in the months ahead. Methodology caveats Valente’s post did not disclose the dataset, category definitions or the measurement period behind those percentages, so the 67% and 80% shares should be read as his analysis rather than independently confirmed industry-wide statistics. Public dashboards and earlier ARK research show similar concentration trends but with different numbers depending on definitions and timeframes. How prior ARK data compares ARK’s Q1 2026 DeFi report reported a roughly 23% quarter-over-quarter drop in total application revenue to about $485 million. In that quarter Hyperliquid generated about $145 million, Pump.fun about $123 million and Axiom about $58 million — and those three apps accounted for roughly 67% of tracked application revenue through March 31. That differs from Valente’s July post but does not necessarily contradict it; the discrepancy could reflect a later period or alternate classification. Why methodology matters Current public trackers illustrate the point. DefiLlama shows 30‑day protocol revenue of $37.46 million for Hyperliquid, $20.32 million for Pump.fun and $14.41 million in fees for Ethena — but only about $42,365 in retained protocol revenue for Ethena after costs. Gross fees, reported revenue and retained protocol revenue are different measures; comparing them interchangeably can mislead. Recent shutdowns, bankruptcies and wind‑downs Several high-profile cases back the consolidation thesis: - Storj Labs filed voluntary Chapter 11 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of West Virginia on July 26 (case 5:26-bk-00512). Storj says it will keep its storage network running while it restructures legacy obligations under court supervision. - BitMEX announced it will close its exchange on Sept. 23 after parent HDR Global Trading completed a strategic review. Users must close positions and withdraw funds before that date. - BitMart halted new registrations and deposits on July 26, plans to end trading on Aug. 26 and intends to cease platform operations on Jan. 31, 2027. - ZeroLend announced a shutdown in February citing sustainability, liquidity and operational risks. - RootData’s 2026 “dead-project” archive lists 99 projects that either announced closures, entered bankruptcy or remained unavailable for extended periods. That figure bundles multiple failure and inactivity types and should not be read as 99 pure insolvencies. Consolidation via acquisitions Not all exits are failures: consolidation is also happening through strategic deals. On July 27 Payward, Kraken’s parent company, agreed to buy Magic Labs’ wallet-as-a-service business. Payward said the acquired infrastructure has supported more than 60 million wallets, over $10 billion in stablecoin volume and about 200,000 developers. The transaction will add embedded non-custodial wallets to Payward Services; financial terms were not disclosed and the parties expect the deal to close within weeks. Signs of weakening activity at top earners Valente’s point that a project can remain a top earner while activity softens holds in practice: Pump.fun’s revenue and volume remain below 2025 levels despite product and fee changes. In short, leadership in revenue does not necessarily mean growth or resilience. What to watch next The next confirmed milestones will come from corporate deadlines and court filings: BitMEX’s Sept. 23 wind-down, BitMart’s Aug. 26 trading cutoff, and Storj’s Chapter 11 motions and creditor processes. Payward’s Magic Labs acquisition is expected to close within weeks. Valente did not provide a numerical forecast for the pace of future deals or bankruptcies; his outlook is a forward-looking assessment grounded in recent examples rather than a formal timetable. Bottom line Multiple data points and recent corporate actions indicate rising concentration in crypto revenue and a wave of consolidation across exchanges, lending protocols and infrastructure. The exact scale and speed depend heavily on how revenue and application categories are measured, so readers should treat headline concentration figures as contingent on methodology. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
South Korea to Overhaul Crypto Rulebook with Unified Digital Asset Act — 22% Tax Fight Looms
South Korea is moving toward a major rewrite of its crypto rulebook — even as a political fight brews over a planned 22% tax on digital-asset gains. What’s happening - The Financial Services Commission (FSC) told the National Assembly it will work with the ruling Democratic Party to draft a consolidated Digital Asset Basic Act. The government-backed framework, previewed ahead of a July 29 policy briefing, is intended to unify and replace parts of the patchwork of bills now before lawmakers. - At the same time, the National Assembly’s Finance and Economic Planning Committee was set to table an opposition amendment aimed at scrapping the cryptocurrency income tax slated to start on Jan. 1, 2027. Neither the consolidated bill nor the repeal motion changes current law yet. Scope of the proposed law The FSC says the consolidated bill would: - Create rules for issuing and circulating stablecoins (including who may issue them); - Define digital asset businesses and regulate their conduct; - Set exchange entry requirements, disclosure rules, internal controls and resilience measures to protect users and keep trading systems reliable. Why this matters South Korea already has the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, which focuses mainly on custody, unfair trading and retail safeguards. The Digital Asset Basic Act is intended as a second-stage law to broaden oversight — covering issuers, service providers and market structure in ways the earlier law does not. Points of contention Several unresolved issues will likely determine the final shape of the bill: - Stablecoin issuer ownership: A key debate is whether won-backed stablecoins must be issued by bank-led consortiums holding at least 50% plus one share. The FSC says issuer ownership rules are not yet final. - Role of banks vs. non-bank issuers: The Bank of Korea supports giving banks a leading role, citing monetary and financial stability concerns, and favors a statutory inter-agency body. Industry groups and some lawmakers instead want licensed, reserve-backed non-bank issuers to be allowed. - Exchange ownership caps and internal controls: Lawmakers must also decide whether to cap exchange shareholdings and tighten internal controls, cybersecurity standards and compensation mechanisms. Legislative process and timeline - Ten separate digital asset and stablecoin bills are already pending in the National Assembly. The FSC plans to coordinate a single government–ruling party proposal that could become the primary negotiating text. - FSC Chairman Lee Eog-weon has signaled an ambition to complete digital asset legislation in 2026 and to strengthen anti-money-laundering rules for stablecoins. - The FSC has not yet finalized the bill wording or announced a filing date. unresolved stablecoin ownership and exchange-shareholding rules are expected to be central negotiation points. The tax battle - Opposition People Power Party lawmaker Song Eon-seok introduced bill 2217609 on March 19 to remove the Income Tax Act provision that taxes income from transferring or lending digital assets. Critics say it’s unfair to tax ordinary crypto investors while most retail stock gains remain tax-exempt. - Under current law, annual crypto gains above 2.5 million won will be taxed at 20% nationally plus a 2% local tax — a combined 22% — starting Jan. 1, 2027. That start date has already been postponed three times since the tax was first scheduled to begin in 2022. - The ruling party and the government support implementing the tax. Tax authorities say the National Tax Service is preparing guidance and has created a unit focused on digital assets. A separate public petition to repeal the tax has gathered more than 50,000 signatures and awaits committee review. Next steps and likely outcomes - The FSC must finish consultations with the ruling party and other authorities before submitting its consolidated bill. If filed, the new government text would be reviewed alongside the ten existing proposals. - The tax-repeal amendment is expected to go to the Finance and Economic Planning Committee’s tax subcommittee, while the public petition goes to a petitions subcommittee — but neither panel had been fully constituted as of the July 29 notice and no review dates were set. - Unless a repeal passes or another delay is approved, the 22% crypto tax remains scheduled to take effect on Jan. 1, 2027. Market impact So far there are no verified links between these legislative developments and any direct, sustained crypto-market price moves. The outcome of stablecoin ownership rules and the tax fight, however, could have significant implications for issuers, exchanges and retail investors in South Korea. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Tether, Nairobi Securities Exchange sign MoU to explore tokenized securities, USDT settlement
Tether and the Nairobi Securities Exchange signed an exploratory memorandum of understanding on July 28 to study tokenized securities, blockchain-based market infrastructure and digital asset education in Kenya — a move that could reshape how securities are issued, traded and settled if regulators and market participants sign off. What the deal covers - The MoU focuses on Hadron, Tether’s tokenization platform, and sets out to evaluate fractional access to NSE-listed instruments for local and diaspora investors, onboarding and compliance workflows aligned with Kenyan AML/KYC rules, and potential uses of USDT as a settlement layer “where permitted.” - The agreement also includes training and workshops for NSE-listed brokers and retail investors, and a review of instant and atomic settlement models that Tether says could simplify the exchange’s multi-stage settlement process. Important caveats — this is exploratory - The MoU does not approve any specific tokenized security, launch a trading platform, or commit the NSE to settle trades in USDT. No pilot date, budget or binding implementation timeline was announced. - Hadron is described by Tether as software that provides issuance, transfer and compliance tools — not the issuer or guarantor of tokens. That means legal and operational responsibilities would still rest with the NSE, issuers, custodians and licensed intermediaries before any product reaches investors. - Tether and the NSE have not identified which securities might be tokenized, which blockchain would be used, or who would custody the underlying assets. They also haven’t explained how blockchain records would integrate with Kenya’s existing central depository and ownership systems. Regulatory backdrop matters - Kenya’s Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASP) Act took effect Nov. 4, 2025. It places tokenization and token issuance platforms under the Capital Markets Authority (CMA), while the Central Bank of Kenya oversees stablecoin issuance. The law requires licensing, AML controls, tech safeguards and approval for covered virtual asset offerings. - Draft implementing regulations were published by the National Treasury in March 2026 and remain drafts with the CMA. The Act explicitly allows rules covering tokenized assets, real-world asset tokenization and stablecoins — meaning any NSE pilot will hinge on how regulators classify and authorize these activities. - The MoU’s phrasing that USDT could be used “where permitted” is significant: it does not imply regulatory approval for using USDT as a securities settlement instrument in Kenya. No CMA or central bank signoff accompanied the announcement. Context and scale - This is not the NSE’s first foray into blockchain. In 2025 the exchange joined DeFi Technologies, Valour and SovFi to develop the Kenya Digital Exchange for tokenized equities, debt, funds and commodities. - Tether introduced Hadron in 2024 to expand beyond stablecoins; the platform supports tokenization of corporate equity, bonds, commodities and sovereign debt with configurable compliance controls. - To provide market context: RWA.xyz tracked about $36.9 billion of tokenized real-world assets (excluding stablecoins) as of July 27, and USDT’s market capitalization was near $184 billion on July 29. Those figures illustrate the broader market’s size but don’t prove demand for tokenized Kenyan securities. Next steps and outstanding questions - Likely next steps include selecting pilot assets, defining ownership and custody arrangements, designing investor disclosures, and securing regulatory clearance. Other unresolved items are settlement finality, redemption rights, data protection, taxation and treatment of local vs. diaspora investors. - The MoU does not set deadlines for these steps. Until regulators approve structures and technical specifications are published, the agreement should be seen as a framework to study tokenization and settlement — not a live market launch. NSE CEO Frank Mwiti framed the partnership as aligning with the exchange’s 2025–2029 strategy to prioritize technology, market participation and investor access, stressing that the work is exploratory rather than a confirmed rollout. For participants and observers, the coming months will be about regulatory clarity and concrete pilot decisions that could determine whether tokenized securities move from concept to Kenyan reality. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Bitcoin’s $66K Bounce Looks Like a Bull Trap as Fed Risk-Off Sparks $670M Liquidations
Headline: Bitcoin’s Recent Bounce Looks Like a Classic Bull Trap as Global Risk-Off Takes Hold Markets opened in the red and then accelerated into a rout. South Korea’s KOSPI plunged more than 8% at the open, tripped a circuit breaker, and sent a risk-off shockwave across global markets before New York desks were fully awake. Crypto felt the pain fast: Bitcoin slid to $62,684 in early trade, briefly clawed back, then stalled. Decrypt’s morning snapshot showed BTC at $63,400 (down 2.7%), Ethereum at $1,875 (-4.2%) and Solana at $73 (-4.4%). In the past 24 hours more than $670 million in crypto positions were liquidated—about $533 million of that from leveraged longs—what you get when too many traders bet on a rally that never held. Traditional markets weren’t spared: oil dropped ~2%, gold dipped ~1%, and Nasdaq futures turned red as memory-chip stocks faltered. Underpinning much of the caution is the Federal Open Market Committee meeting running today and tomorrow, with Fed Chair Kevin Warsh slated to hold a press conference on July 29. Markets broadly expect the Fed to hold rates at 3.50–3.75%, but traders remain jittery after Warsh’s June presser boosted odds of further hikes and sent 2-year Treasury yields sharply higher. The result: many players are deleveraging rather than weathering the event. Why the Bitcoin bounce is probably a trap Earlier in the session a push toward $66,921 briefly rekindled optimism—some traders pointed to the 200-day exponential moving average (EMA) holding as evidence the bull run could resume. But a deeper read of the charts tells a different story. - Short-term damage: Between Monday and Tuesday BTC gave back the prior week’s gains, wiping out the recent bullish run and returning to the territory that looked bearish before the bounce. - Longer-term structure: On the daily chart stretching back to September 2025, price has traded well below the Ichimoku cloud and the 200-day average for months. Green weeks appear, get sold, and the downtrend resumes. - Parallel resistances: The current resistance mirrors prior lines that marked the May–July decline. Three bearish resistance lines (from Nov 2025–Apr, May–Jul, and the current one) form a parallel, consistent downtrend. - EMAs and the “death cross”: The 50 EMA sits below the 200 EMA and price is under both—classic death-cross territory that’s been in place for months, signaling a structurally weak trend. - Momentum readings: The RSI sits at 46.5—below 50 and leaning bearish, but not oversold enough (
XRP Slumps as Clarity Act Is Shelved and Fed Jitters Squeeze Crypto
XRP slid as crypto markets wrestle with a sour macro backdrop and fading hopes for a key legislative boost. Why markets are jittery - The new Fed chair, Kevin Warsh, is widely expected to hold the policy rate at 3.50%–3.75% at his second FOMC meeting, but recent CME FedWatch data pushed the odds of another hike as high as 38% last weekend — the strongest odds of this tightening cycle. Even a “hawkish hold” can spook risk assets. - Bitcoin is stuck around $63,400–$64,000, well under its June highs near $80,000, leaving altcoins to bear the brunt of risk-off flows. What happened to the Clarity Act — and why it matters for XRP - XRP briefly rallied in July after reports on July 21 said President Donald Trump had agreed to the Clarity Act’s long-stalled ethics provision. The token jumped about 3.25% to $1.1485, and Polymarket briefly put Senate passage odds at 43%. - That momentum faded when the Senate formally shelved the Clarity Act to prioritize a Russia sanctions bill and federal nominations. The chamber’s August recess starts around August 7, leaving a narrow window for a floor vote this year. Miss that window and a meaningful legislative chance could be delayed until late 2026 — and possibly into 2027, given the post-recess legislative calendar. - Why this matters: the Clarity Act would codify XRP’s status as a commodity. That legal certainty is the linchpin institutional custodians, banks and ETF issuers need to build products around the token. Without it, conditional bullish scenarios — like Standard Chartered’s $8 XRP target, which depends on full Senate passage plus $4–$8 billion in new ETF inflows — remain theoretical. Price and technical snapshot - Current price (Binance): $1.0641, market cap ~ $65 billion. 24-hour range: $1.0450–$1.0679. - Longer-term context: XRP peaked near $3.40 in mid-2025 and has been trading in a descending channel since, logging lower highs and lower lows. - ADX: 11.2 — one of the weakest readings all summer. An ADX under 25 signals no confirmed trend; readings below 20 often mean choppy, directionless conditions where false breakouts and stop hunts are common. Decrypt flagged an ADX of 13.3 on July 16, and the token has mostly been in this limbo through July. - Directional indicators: DI- (bearish) is beginning to rotate toward DI+ (bullish pressure), a modest constructive sign, but not decisive. - Moving averages: 50-day EMA sits below the 200-day EMA — a classic “death cross” that points to a continued medium-term downtrend since the $3.65 all-time high. - RSI: 40.9 — below neutral but not in deeply oversold territory that typically draws aggressive bargain hunters. - Fibonacci levels: the current bearish leg runs from $1.1646 down to $1.0450. If that breaks, next supports sit near $1.0125 and $0.9711. What could move XRP next Two catalysts will likely determine direction in the near term: 1) The Fed meeting — If Chair Warsh delivers a dovish hold or hints at cuts in September, crypto could get a relief pop and XRP may test the $1.10–$1.12 zone. If the statement is hawkish or shows dissent, the sell-off could extend toward $1.01 and then $0.97. 2) The Clarity Act — Legislative progress is the longer-term institutional catalyst. If a floor vote doesn’t happen before the August recess, the window for passage this year narrows dramatically, delaying the legal clarity institutional players need. Bottom line Technically and fundamentally, XRP’s case argues for patience. Low ADX, negative momentum on volatility indicators, and a persistent death cross suggest the market can stay compressed and choppy longer than many expect. Short-term bounces are possible, but without a macro pivot or a legislative surprise, they may be selling opportunities rather than the start of a sustained recovery. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial or investment advice. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news