Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.71T
Market Cap
$2.71T
24h Trading Volume
$88.96B
BTC Dominance
58.30%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Spot Bitcoin ETFs Extend Redemption Streak with $229M Outflow; Spot ETH Logs $121M
Spot Bitcoin ETFs extended their recent redemption streak on May 28, with roughly $229 million pulled from the products as investor outflows across crypto-linked ETFs accelerated, according to SoSoValue. Spot Ethereum ETFs were hit too, posting $121.4 million in net outflows and marking their 13th straight trading day of withdrawals. Key figures (May 28, SoSoValue) - Bitcoin ETFs: $229M outflow; cumulative net inflows now $55.79B; total net assets $94.25B; daily trading volume $2.36B. - Ethereum ETFs: $121.4M outflow; cumulative net inflows $11.39B; total net assets $11.30B; daily trading volume $691.3M. The Bitcoin complex has now seen nine consecutive sessions of net redemptions, shaving about $2.84B from the funds since the streak began. The heaviest single-day drain in the run occurred on May 27 (-$733.4M), following notable withdrawals on May 26 (-$333.7M) and May 18 (-$648.6M). The last inflow day before the slump was May 14 (+$131.3M). Over that two-week window, total net assets for Bitcoin ETFs fell from $107.75B on May 14 to $94.25B on May 28 — a decline driven by both redemptions and underlying BTC price movements. Ethereum’s outflows have been proportionally sharper: the 13-day streak starting May 11 has pulled about $694.6M from spot ETH ETFs. The largest single-day loss was May 12 (-$130.6M), followed by May 28’s $121.4M withdrawal. On May 28 the ETH outflows amounted to roughly 1.07% of the funds’ total net assets, versus about 0.24% for BTC ETFs — underscoring how nine-figure outflows hit a smaller ETH ETF base harder. Why it matters - Scale differences: Bitcoin ETFs still sit on a far larger asset base and far bigger cumulative inflows, so they can absorb larger absolute outflows more easily than Ethereum ETFs. - Liquidity and trading: falling ETF assets can reduce a major liquidity channel for spot crypto, potentially amplifying price moves during volatile periods. - Market backdrop: outflows coincided with a less favorable macro environment for non-yielding risk assets — rising long-end Treasury yields pushed back expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, nudging investors toward defensive allocations. At the same time, one significant corporate buyer paused fresh purchases after its preferred stock traded below par, removing a source of Bitcoin-specific demand. At press time BTC traded near $73,661. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
XRP Drops Below $1.30 as Binance Volatility Surges and Perp Z‑Score Nears 1
XRP’s recent weakness shows little sign of easing, with the token slipping below the $1.30 support level on Thursday and sparking increased volatility across exchanges — most notably on Binance. Binance, the world’s largest crypto venue, has been particularly affected as traders contend with choppy momentum and large swings in XRP activity. Although the token briefly stabilized around the $1.30 area, trading on the platform remains highly erratic. On-chain/perp metrics underline the turbulence. The XRP perp-spot volume imbalance is roughly 0.54, and its Z-score has climbed to about 0.95. In plain terms, perpetual contract volumes are materially higher than in calmer periods, signaling more traders taking short-term, leveraged positions. A Z-score approaching 1 means current activity is nearly a full standard deviation above the recent norm — a shift from ordinary market balance into a phase of unusually high activity. If that Z-score moves closer to or above 1, momentum could become even more pronounced. Historical readings also show a move from a negative zone into positive territory, suggesting a return of risk appetite and renewed speculative participation after a quieter stretch. That said, price action hasn’t mirrored the full strength of these indicators: Arab Chain notes XRP largely traded in a $1.34–$1.45 band for much of the observed period, even as volumes and Z-score picked up. At the time of writing XRP was trading around $1.31 after a one-day drop. Despite the bearish backdrop, reports from CW indicate that long positions are being bought following short-covering — a sign that genuine upward pressure may be emerging for those watching for a potential rebound. Bottom line: heightened perp activity and rising Z-scores point to increased leverage and volatility — raising the risk of further corrective moves — but pockets of buying after short-covering mean the market’s next direction remains contested. Traders should watch perp-spot volume imbalance and the Z-score closely for clues on whether momentum will accelerate or calm. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Ripple Asks SEC to Clear Broker-Dealer Rules for Stablecoins and Tokenized Securities
Ripple has formally pressed the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for clearer rules on payment stablecoins and tokenized securities, escalating a conversation that began when the company met with the SEC’s Crypto Task Force in March. In a detailed follow-up letter to the Task Force, Ripple lays out concrete regulatory changes it says are needed to bring traditional broker-dealer rules into line with digital-asset realities: - Clarify how stablecoins can be treated as collateral on broker-dealer balance sheets by amending Rule 15c3-1 (the SEC’s net capital rule). - Define custody standards for client stablecoins under Rule 15c3-3 (the customer protection rule) by creating a new category of “Qualified Payment Stablecoins.” - Confirm that non-security crypto assets beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum can receive equivalent treatment if they meet an established “readily marketable” test—proposing that the SEC revise Question 4 in its crypto FAQ to reflect this. - Provide a formal analysis showing why the current 2% haircut on stablecoins is punitive; Ripple argues that stablecoins should have a 0% haircut where there is a mint-burn relationship between broker-dealers and issuers. - Resolve the legal ambiguity around ownership records in tokenized (“digital twin”) structures by designating the on-chain registry as the single authoritative legal register, rather than allowing parallel on-chain and off-chain ledgers to coexist without clarity. Ripple frames these requests as practical steps to harmonize long-standing securities and customer-protection rules with payment stablecoins and tokenized instruments—areas the company says the SEC has only partially addressed. The letter references recent SEC guidance that classified certain major cryptocurrencies as commodities alongside Bitcoin and Ethereum, and asks the commission to extend comparable treatment to other non-securities that meet the marketability standard. Why it matters: amending 15c3-1 and 15c3-3, and resolving registry and haircut issues, could reduce capital and custody frictions for firms working with stablecoins and tokenized assets. Ripple argues such changes would enable safer, clearer on-chain settlement and broader institutional adoption without sacrificing investor protections. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse also weighed in publicly. In an X post, he celebrated what he called a defeat of the “anti-crypto army” by the courts, voters, and President Trump, calling past enforcement hostility a “crypto witch hunt” that made “no policy, legal, or political sense.” His remarks followed a post by former President Trump blaming ex-SEC Chair Gary Gensler and anti-crypto actors for nearly destroying the U.S. crypto industry and pledging to codify the CLARITY Act. Ripple’s letter is a follow-up to its March 20 meeting with the SEC’s Crypto Task Force, where the parties discussed treatment of payment stablecoins and tokenized securities under net capital and consumer protection rules and explored possible next steps toward broader guidance. The industry will be watching for the SEC’s response—and whether regulators move to update legacy rules to better reflect on-chain mechanics. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
CFTC Greenlights U.S. Bitcoin Perpetuals — Coinbase Cleared, Kalshi to Launch
The CFTC opens the door to U.S. Bitcoin perpetuals, Coinbase gets green light, and Kalshi moves in The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on Friday cleared the way for regulated exchanges it oversees to list perpetual contracts tied to Bitcoin (BTC), a move the agency said will “create a clearer path” for liquid Bitcoin perpetual products to operate under U.S. rules. Perpetual contracts—derivatives with no fixed expiry that mirror spot price moves—are a staple of offshore crypto markets; the CFTC framed its decision as a major step toward bringing those products onshore, calling the availability of “true perpetuals” in the U.S. a significant advance and aligning the action with President Trump’s stated goal of cementing the United States as a global crypto capital. The announcement came alongside a separate regulatory action: a no-action letter to Coinbase. Under that guidance, Coinbase’s U.S. customers can access the options and perpetuals the exchange already offers. Coinbase Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal hailed the development on X (formerly Twitter), calling it “a massive first for the industry” and saying it reflects efforts to bring “proven global products under American regulation,” which he argued is essential to making the U.S. a leading hub for crypto. Market entrants responded quickly. Prediction-market platform Kalshi said Friday it will begin offering perpetual futures contracts—starting with crypto perpetuals—positioning its product as a regulated U.S. alternative to offshore venues. Kalshi highlighted the rapid expansion of the offshore perpetual market, which it said grew from $28 trillion in annual volume in 2023 to more than $90 trillion in 2025. The firm said its perpetuals will charge funding rates every eight hours (with those rates visible in transaction history) and noted that agricultural commodity perpetuals will not be part of the initial rollout. What this means: U.S. traders may soon get access to perpetual-style crypto derivatives under domestic oversight, while exchanges and platforms that want to offer these products will need to work within the CFTC’s regulatory framework or secure similar guidance. For the industry, the twin moves—regulatory clarity from the CFTC and Coinbase’s no-action letter—represent an important push to migrate high-volume perpetual trading onto regulated U.S. venues. Featured image created with OpenArt; chart from TradingView.com Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Solana Gets an Institutional Boost: Forward Industries' $624M SOL Treasury Added to Russell Indexes
Solana just scored a meaningful institutional win — even if the market hasn’t loudly applauded yet. Forward Industries, the Nasdaq-listed company that morphed from a medical-products maker into a Solana-focused digital-asset treasury, will be added to the Russell 2000 and Russell 3000 indexes when FTSE Russell’s semi-annual reconstitution takes effect on June 29, 2026. That inclusion puts one of the largest public corporate SOL treasuries squarely in index-benchmarked market structures followed by passive funds, small-cap allocators and institutional managers. Key facts - Forward Industries holds 7,013,536 SOL (reported at roughly $624 million), making it the largest publicly traded corporate Solana holder — about 1.121% of total supply. - The company’s strategy centers on buying, holding, staking and investing in SOL and Solana-related assets, meaning its fortunes are tightly linked to SOL’s long-term value. - The Russell move could add passive and institutional exposure to Solana via Forward’s stock, potentially increasing demand for SOL-linked instruments when the change goes live. Broader context Forward isn’t the only crypto treasury firm benefiting from index reconstitutions. Ethereum treasury manager SharpLink — holding roughly 874,351 ETH (about $1.8 billion) — is also set to join the Russell 2000 and 3000 at the same rebalance. Meanwhile BitMine and Galaxy Digital are expected to move into the Russell 1000. Together, these moves point to growing acceptance of crypto treasuries by index providers and the asset-management ecosystem. Why it matters — and what to watch Index inclusion can create incremental buying pressure and improve liquidity and visibility for associated assets. For Forward, a rising SOL price would validate its treasury model and could make the company a straightforward public-market proxy for Solana exposure. Conversely, if SOL weakens, Forward’s balance-sheet strategy could be pressured. But the market picture for SOL itself remains mixed. SOL is trading near $80 — requiring a rally of more than 20% to crack $100 — and recent upside attempts have stalled (most notably a rejection around $98 on May 11). Technical watchers will be looking for SOL to hold around $85 and clear $90 as a path toward $98–$100. The Russell inclusions on June 29 could be a catalyst, but price strength will still need to follow. Bottom line Forward Industries’ entry into the Russell 2000 and 3000 is a notable institutional milestone for Solana’s ecosystem, reinforcing a trend of crypto treasuries entering mainstream market structures. Whether it translates to sustained upside for SOL depends on market momentum and investor appetite between now and the June 29 reconstitution. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Analyst Warns Bitcoin Could Drop to $52K in 'Wyckoff Accumulation' Before Rally to $110K
A crypto analyst is warning that Bitcoin may be tracing one of the most psychologically painful setups in its history — a classic Wyckoff Accumulation — and that a sharp pre-rally shakeout could still be ahead. What the analyst says On a post to X on Monday the 26th, market commentator NoName argued that Bitcoin’s weekly structure is now showing textbook signs of Wyckoff Accumulation, a long-standing market framework describing how large players quietly buy into weakness before a major advance. According to NoName, the pattern’s purpose is to “shake out” ordinary investors by creating fear and chaos before institutions step in. Key technical observations - NoName says the early Wyckoff phases are already visible on the weekly chart: Preliminary Support (PS), Selling Climax (SC), and Secondary Test (ST) have been printed. - Despite a brief recovery in March and April, selling pressure remains widespread — consistent, he argues, with accumulation activity by larger players keeping prices suppressed. - He projects one final “Spring” — a decisive dip to roughly $52,000 — which would drive stops and induce panic selling, clearing weak hands before larger buying resumes. Projected path after the shakeout - The analyst frames the ~$52,000 move not as a sustained breakdown but as a short-term clearing action. - He expects smart money to aggressively buy into that area and calls it his personal accumulation zone. - If the Wyckoff sequence continues as mapped, the next phase could push price back through the Last Point of Support (LPS) near ~$76,000 and then trigger a Sign of Strength (SOS) breakout, with a subsequent target north of $110,000. Bottom line This is one analyst’s technical read of Bitcoin’s weekly structure based on Wyckoff theory — a framework that has both proponents and critics. The scenario hinges on a final low near $52,000 followed by institutional accumulation and a multi-stage rally. As always, such projections are speculative and investors should do their own research and manage risk accordingly. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news