Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.31T
Market Cap
$2.31T
24h Trading Volume
$70.34B
BTC Dominance
56.22%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Coinbase doubles down on Agentic Finance as Base x402 payments top 100M
Coinbase is doubling down on “agentic” finance as onchain payments on its Base network top 100 million. In a July 27 post on X, CEO Brian Armstrong pushed back on the idea that AI and crypto are competitors. He framed Base, USDC and the new x402 payments standard as the backbone of Coinbase’s “Agentic Finance” (AiFi) strategy — a vision where autonomous software agents hold wallets, make micropayments and buy digital services without human intervention. “AI being a megatrend takes nothing away from crypto,” Armstrong wrote, arguing that programmable money is essential because legacy bank rails and card checkouts depend on human identity checks and manual approval. How the agentic model works - Software agents would be able to hold wallets, pay for API calls, data, compute or content, and receive services onchain without opening accounts with every provider. - x402 leverages the HTTP 402 “Payment Required” code: a site or API requests payment in a stablecoin, a client signs a blockchain transaction, and access is granted once the payment settles. - USDC is the common settlement asset because it tracks the U.S. dollar. Coinbase also offers Agentic Wallets to let developers set spending and trading rules for these autonomous systems, and Coinbase for Agents gives software controlled access to trading, portfolio management and x402 payments. Traction, and important caveats Chainalysis reported on June 3 that x402-linked payments on Base surpassed 100 million transactions after roughly nine months of activity. Its analysis found: - Payments of at least $1 accounted for 95% of transferred value. - Wallets associated with agentic payments tended to be newer, held smaller balances and held many more asset types — about 550% more — than typical Base users. But Chainalysis also warned that much of the early transaction growth was driven by meme-coin farming, automated scripts and incentive campaigns — not necessarily independent AI agents buying useful services. Transaction counts can balloon when an agent makes many low-value payments during a single task, yet high frequency doesn’t automatically equal high economic value. In short, the 100 million milestone is notable but doesn’t prove that autonomous agents already outpace humans in daily payments — something Armstrong has predicted without a set timeline. Product ecosystem and real-world pilots Coinbase has been building around this vision since launching Base (a low-fee Ethereum layer-2) in February 2023 and x402 in May 2025. Recent product additions include: - Agentic Wallets and policy tools for automated spending, - Coinbase for Agents, which exposes trading and portfolio functions to software within user-defined limits, - x402 business features that let companies accept USDC directly from software agents, and - Agentic.market, a marketplace where agents can discover and pay for services using USDC. Outside Coinbase, companies are testing x402 for travel, cloud services and content. Travala, for example, rolled out an AI hotel-booking system that lets agents search more than 2.2 million properties and pay with USDC on Base. What to watch next - Classification: adoption figures will depend heavily on how analysts distinguish genuine agent-driven purchases from automated scripts, farming and incentive-driven activity. - Product and risk factors: security, spending controls, identity rules and service quality will shape broader uptake. - Financials: Coinbase reports Q2 2026 results on July 30 after markets close; the company hasn’t said it will break out AiFi revenue specifically, but investors will be watching for any detail on stablecoin revenue, Base activity and developer products. Bottom line: Coinbase is betting that programmable, onchain payments will be a natural fit for AI-driven software. The tech and early usage on Base are real, and 100 million x402 transactions mark meaningful momentum — but the economic significance of those transactions, and whether autonomous agents will truly outnumber humans in payment volume, remain open questions. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
BNY Mellon’s Belgian Arm Joins MiCA Register as EU Authorised Crypto Firms Reach 309
BNY’s Belgian arm joins MiCA register as Europe’s authorised crypto firms climb to 309 The European crypto authorisation landscape keeps expanding: the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) added 15 crypto-asset service providers (CASPs) to its interim Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) register, bringing the count to 309 distinct authorised providers based on the register file dated July 23 (published July 24). Headline addition: BNY SA/NV - One of the most notable additions is BNY SA/NV, the Belgian subsidiary of U.S. financial services giant BNY Mellon. The National Bank of Belgium authorised the unit on July 20 to provide custody and transfer services for crypto-assets on behalf of clients. BNY reported $62.6 trillion in assets under custody or administration as of June 30; its Belgian arm already acts as a major European custody bank. The MiCA entry covers custody/administration and transfer services only — it does not authorise exchange or trading-platform operations. Who else made the cut The 15 new entries come from eight jurisdictions. Highlights include: - Germany (4): Raiffeisenbank Falkenstein‑Wörth; Spar‑ und Kreditbank Rheinstetten; VR‑Bank Augsburg‑Ostallgäu; JT Technologies. - Denmark (3): Coinify ApS; SafeLynx Technologies; Januar (payment and banking infrastructure for digital-asset firms). - Netherlands (1): BitPay B.V. (digital payments). - Bulgaria (2): Altcoins BG; Digital Assist. - Latvia (2): Bleap; Nodu Digital. - Cyprus (1): SG Digital Assets. - Liechtenstein (1): Damoon Technology Europe. ESMA’s register lists each firm alongside its national regulator, approval date and permitted services. Why the total reads differently in some trackers ESMA’s published CSV contains 312 rows, but some firms appear more than once. A tally by data firm NorthPoint counted 309 distinct entity‑and‑regulator pairs — the figure many outlets are using. Other trackers that count authorisation records rather than unique providers may report a higher total. Context: MiCA transition and what authorisation means The update follows the end of the EU’s MiCA transition period on July 1. Firms that had been operating under national registrations must now hold a CASP authorisation for covered services or wind those activities down. A MiCA authorisation granted by one national authority can support cross‑border services after the passporting process, but only for the services specifically approved for that provider. Market impact and caveats - The register’s rising CASP count shows national authorities are continuing to process applications after the July 1 deadline, but the list does not indicate how quickly an authorised provider will launch services or whether it can absorb long‑term compliance costs. - Gate Europe CEO Giovanni Cunti warned some newly licensed firms “may not be capable to sustain the cost and the resources” required by ongoing staffing, reporting, security and capital obligations, potentially shrinking the practical regulated market. - ESMA stresses the register is a public record of authorisation, not a rating of financial strength or service quality, and national authorities feed the data to ESMA (so entries may not appear immediately). What to watch - Weekly ESMA updates will show whether the number of authorised providers keeps rising after the July 1 deadline. - Which newly authorised firms actually launch services, how quickly passporting is used to expand cross‑border offerings, and whether smaller entrants can shoulder MiCA’s compliance burden will determine how the European regulated crypto market shapes up in the months ahead. Previous update In the prior weekly file ESMA added 14 providers (taking the register to 294), including Ripple Payments Europe and several banks. That round and this one have already driven changes in market access and service availability for some providers and customers across Europe. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
GrapheneOS Duress PIN Sparks First U.S. Indictment After Atlanta Airport Border Search
Headline: Man Charged After Using GrapheneOS “Duress” PIN at Atlanta Airport — A Test Case for Privacy Tools at the Border A Georgia man is facing federal prison time after using a privacy feature that deliberately wipes a phone when a second, “duress” passcode is entered. According to federal prosecutors, Atlanta resident Samuel Tunick triggered that wipe during a warrantless border search at Hartsfield-Jackson airport on January 24, 2025, and has since been indicted under the rarely used federal statute 18 U.S.C. § 2232 — which criminalizes knowingly destroying property to keep it from being seized by authorities. How the duress PIN works The duress passcode is a built-in safety mechanism in GrapheneOS, a hardened privacy-focused version of Android developed for Google Pixel phones and widely adopted by journalists, activists, security researchers — and privacy-conscious members of the crypto community. With two codes set up, entering the usual PIN unlocks the phone normally. Entering the duress PIN performs an immediate, irreversible wipe by deleting the device’s encryption keys, leaving the phone in a factory-reset state and rendering the data unreadable. GrapheneOS added the duress PIN in June 2024 to protect people who might be compelled at gunpoint or under duress to unlock devices. The OS has previously complicated court-ordered monitoring efforts; in 2023, privacy-focused ROMs including GrapheneOS frustrated attempts to install surveillance tools even when a judge had authorized them. What happened at the airport Tunick’s lawyers say U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) pulled him into secondary inspection after he returned from the Dominican Republic and demanded access to his phone without a warrant, invoking the “border search exception” that allows device inspections at the border. They also say he was denied a lawyer and not read Miranda rights. Court filings state that when Tunick supplied a code, “the screen went blank, flashed several times, and the phone appeared to restart.” Agents seized the device and released him shortly after. The indictment alleges Tunick provided “a passcode to border agents that caused the phone to delete the digital contents,” before the device was seized. Tunick has pleaded not guilty and has moved to suppress evidence; a federal judge is expected to rule on that motion no earlier than the end of October. Why it matters to the crypto and privacy communities This appears to be the first known U.S. criminal prosecution tied specifically to the use of a duress passcode. If prosecutions under 18 U.S.C. § 2232 become a roadmap for charging people who use privacy tools to protect data at the border, it could have a chilling effect on the adoption of encryption and anti-coercion features — tools many in crypto and digital-rights circles view as essential protections. Civil-liberties groups are watching. The Electronic Frontier Foundation provides public guidance on travelers’ device rights at the U.S. border as part of broader efforts to defend privacy-first tools. The case will likely be read as a test of how far government power extends when device-extraction and anti-forensics measures collide at the border. Tunick’s case will be closely followed by privacy advocates, security researchers, and anyone who relies on encryption and device-hardening tools to protect sensitive data. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
BitMart to Wind Down After 9 Years; BMX Token Plunges 81% as Withdrawals Begin
BitMart to Wind Down Trading Platform After Nine Years, BMX Token Plummets Cryptocurrency exchange BitMart announced on Sunday that it will begin an orderly wind-down of its trading platform after nine years of operation — the latest major exchange to shutter this month. The decision sent BitMart’s native BMX token into a steep decline and marks the second large exchange closure announced within a week. Key dates and immediate changes - As of 01:30 UTC on Sunday (July 26, 2026), BitMart stopped accepting new user registrations, deposits, and new orders. - All spot and derivatives trading on the platform will end on August 26, 2026. - The exchange’s platform is scheduled to formally close on January 31, 2027. What BitMart said In a public notice, BitMart said it carried out “a careful evaluation of the Company’s operating conditions, market environment, and future strategic direction” and made the “difficult decision” to wind down operations. The company said it aims to manage the process “responsibly, orderly, and transparently.” User access and withdrawals Withdrawals remain open, but BitMart warned that heightened verification — including identity, device, sanctions, and source-of-funds checks — may slow processing times as users rush to withdraw assets. Market reaction and token fallout BitMart’s BMX exchange token has collapsed about 81% over the past week to $0.057, cutting its market capitalization to roughly $19.6 million, according to CoinGecko. The token’s sharp decline reflects investor concerns over the exchange’s future and the broader uncertainty around exchange wind-downs. Background and context BitMart previously suffered a major security incident in December 2021, when a hot-wallet breach cost the platform approximately $196 million. The exchange said at the time that it covered customer losses. The closure follows a similar announcement from derivatives venue BitMEX, which said it would shut down after 11 years. Industry observers see both exits as part of a wider consolidation in crypto. “We are entering a period of significant consolidation in digital assets,” Roshan Dharia, CEO of investment firm Echo Base, told Decrypt. He added that the firms best positioned to survive will be those that “recognize the pressure early, act decisively, and secure the right capital and strategic support before their options narrow.” What users should do Users still holding assets on BitMart should prioritize withdrawals while monitoring the exchange’s verification notices. Given potential delays and the ongoing wind-down, keeping records of account communications and transaction IDs is advisable. BitMart did not disclose specific financial metrics or an external buyer as part of the announcement, and it has not detailed a plan for any remaining corporate assets beyond the stated wind-down timeline. We’ll continue to follow developments and report updates as they emerge. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
OneFunded vs Breakout: Choosing Between Multi-Asset and Crypto-Native Prop Firms
Disclosure: This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice. Prop trading firms have democratised access to the capital retail traders need to scale positions — and the landscape has exploded. Industry estimates put active prop firms at over 2,000 today, with roughly 70% offering crypto as a tradable asset and about 50 focused exclusively on digital assets. That abundance is great — but it also makes choosing the right funded account more complex. Should you use a multi-asset firm that bundles crypto with forex and stocks, or go with a crypto-native platform built only for digital markets? This guide cuts through the noise. Below we compare multi-asset and crypto-only proprietary trading firms, spotlight leading operators in each camp, and map trader profiles to the platforms that best suit them. Multi-asset vs. crypto-native: what’s different? - Multi-asset firms: These began the prop firm boom and function much like brokers, offering CFDs/futures across forex, commodities, metals, indices, equities — and crypto as an additional instrument. They suit traders who want one consolidated account for multiple markets and often provide familiar platforms like MT5 or cTrader. - Crypto-native firms: These firms trade only digital assets. Their platforms, product sets, and risk rules are tailored to the unique characteristics of crypto markets (e.g., 24/7 trading, abrupt volatility, different liquidity). They’re ideal if you trade coins and token pairs exclusively. Research process For this comparison, firms had to meet at least one of six selection criteria developed for our review (coverage across markets, payout speed/options, profit splits/scaling, evaluation structure, risk-rule transparency, and platform/liquidity access). Firms meeting multiple criteria ranked higher in our findings. Top multi-asset prop firms (highlights) 1) OneFunded - Standout: Topped our criteria set and was named Fastest Growing Prop Firm, Global at the UF Awards 2026. - Corporate: Operates under Brynex Tech Limited (UK) with trading services via OneFunded Capital Ltd (Saint Lucia). - Payouts & splits: Up to 90% profit split (firm retains 10%). First payout unlocks 14 days after the first funded position when the account reaches at least $100 in profit; payouts process in roughly 1 hour. Recurring payouts every 14 days (can be shortened to 7 with a Weekly Payout Add-on). Methods: USDT (TRC20), bank transfer, or Rise (same $100 minimum). - Rules & platform: Consistency rules: 50% for Flash programs and 20% for Instant programs. Offers MT5, cTrader, and TradeLocker. Unlimited evaluation period and clear drawdown parameters. - Best for: Patient, disciplined multi-asset traders who want consolidated access to multiple markets and predictable rule enforcement rather than extreme crypto leverage. 2) BrightFunded - Overview: Dubai-based (BrightFunded Co LLC / Bright Global FZCO), launched 2023. - Payouts & splits: Default 80% split, scalable to 100% with loyalty/scaling. First payout available 30 days after the first trade; payouts processed within 24 hours once approved. Withdrawal methods: crypto and bank transfer. - Structure & rules: Offers evaluation-only paths (no instant funding). Notably, BrightFunded applies no consistency rules and imposes only a brief 5-minute news-trading restriction, supporting event-driven strategies. - Best for: Traders who trade high-volatility news events and want fast access to payouts. 3) Goat Funded Trader (GFT) - Corporate: Trade name of Wishes Tower International Limited (Hong Kong). Large user base (~250,000 traders). - Payouts & splits: Default 80% split; can scale to 100% via loyalty/points. The GOAT Model’s first on-demand reward pays just 40% (even if upgraded) — subsequent payouts revert to the standard split. Payout frequency: bi-weekly on GOAT/Pro, every 10 days on Standard. Withdrawals capped for the first two requests at 6% of initial account or $10,000 (whichever is lower). Methods: Rise, Skrill, crypto. Processing promise: within 2 business days. - Rules & limits: Daily profit cap ($3,000), consistency rule, and a 5-minute news-trading profit cap encourage steady, disciplined growth. - Best for: High-capacity traders who can generate consistent, controlled gains within firm limits. 4) FundedNext - Corporate: Operated by FundedNext Ltd (registered in the Comoros); markets itself as based in Ajman, UAE. - Payouts & splits: Reward Share starts at 80% for certain Stellar accounts (opened Jan 12, 2026 onward), scalable to 90% via Scale-Up and up to 95% with paid add-ons. Express accounts begin at 60% for the first withdrawal then scale to 75% and 90% on subsequent payouts. Also offers a 15% reward on Challenge profits after meeting Scale-Up criteria. - Timing & methods: Payouts typically start 21 days after funding and recur every 14 days (some accounts have faster cycles or on-demand options). Supported methods: USDT (ERC20, TRC20), USDC (ERC20), Confirmo, RiseWorks, bank transfer, and FNmarkets deposits. - Crypto nuance: Crypto positions carry a triple swap charge on Fridays (for weekend rollover). - Best for: Traders willing to wait standard funding/payout cycles while climbing reward tiers. Top crypto-native firm (highlight) 1) Breakout - Background: Launched Nov 2023; acquired by Kraken in late 2025 — the only firm on our list owned directly by an exchange. Breakout uses its own platform backed by Kraken liquidity. - Payouts & splits: Default 80% split, upgradable to 90% at checkout for a fee. Withdrawals can be requested anytime from $50 balance; the firm advertises “no approval queue” and potentially same-day first payouts. - Method: Only supports USDC on ERC-20. - Best for: Strict crypto traders who want on-demand payouts and the liquidity assurances of an exchange-owned prop desk. Specialist picks for particular crypto needs - If your edge lives beyond Bitcoin and Ethereum and you need broad token coverage: HyroTrader (direct Bybit API, ~700+ pairs) is a strong fit. Crypto Fund Trader is another option with 550+ pairs via Bybit plus hundreds more through MT5 and Match-Trader. Which path should you choose? - Pick a multi-asset firm if you want one account for forex, indices, stocks and crypto — OneFunded stands out here for its consolidated offering, transparent rules, and flexible evaluation. - Choose a crypto-native firm if you trade coins exclusively and need features built around 24/7 markets, token liquidity, and quick, crypto-only payouts — Breakout is an example, especially for traders seeking on-demand withdrawals backed by exchange liquidity. Practical advice before you apply A funded account can accelerate a trading career, but it’s not a shortcut. Before signing up: - Know the rules: Understand drawdowns, consistency rules, daily/weekly caps, and news-trading restrictions. - Check payout mechanics: Minimums, processing times, supported payout rails, and any initial withdrawal caps. - Stress-test your strategy: Simulate the firm’s evaluation conditions and ensure your edge survives the constraints. - Manage risk: Define non-negotiables for position sizing, max drawdown, and capital preservation. - Factor fees & tax: Consider evaluation fees, add-on costs, funding limits, and tax/withdrawal implications for crypto vs fiat payouts. - Have realistic expectations: Not everyone passes the challenge. Success requires discipline, a repeatable strategy, and an understanding of the odds. Bottom line Prop firms have opened doors for retail crypto traders to access institutional-sized capital. The right choice depends on whether you want all markets in one account or a platform purpose-built for crypto. Match your trading profile to a firm’s rules, payout structure, and product coverage — and enter the evaluation with a robust, tested plan. Disclosure: This content was provided by a third party. Neither crypto.news nor the article’s author endorses any product mentioned here. Always perform your own research before acting on information about financial services. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Circle Snaps Up Nearly 1,000 IBM Blockchain Patents to Bolster USDC, Arc & Payments
Headline: Circle snaps up nearly 1,000 IBM blockchain patents as it doubles down on USDC, Arc and payments infrastructure Circle Internet Financial announced on July 27 that it has acquired more than 680 IBM patent families—nearly 1,000 issued patents worldwide—covering a wide swath of blockchain and enterprise technologies. The portfolio spans blockchain infrastructure, banking, payments, insurance, supply-chain verification, enterprise systems and secure cloud operations. Financial terms of the deal were not disclosed. Circle framed the purchase as a strategic leap: the company says the acquisition makes it “the leader in blockchain patent holdings in the United States.” Circle did not publish a full list of patents, a methodology for that ranking, or an independent comparison with other U.S. patent holders. It’s also worth noting that a “patent family” bundles related filings across jurisdictions, so 680 families and about 1,000 issued patents do not equal 1,000 entirely distinct inventions. How Circle plans to use the patents Circle said the portfolio will help underpin its core products and road map: USDC, the Circle Payments Network (CPN), Arc and other on‑chain offerings. Circle general counsel Sarah Wilson called intellectual property “critical” to the company’s push to expand on‑chain infrastructure. But the company didn’t identify which specific patents cover stablecoin issuance, cross‑border settlement, blockchain networks or agentic finance tools, nor did it explain whether IBM retained any licenses, regional rights or other carve-outs. What the products do - CPN is a payments network that connects participating financial institutions so they can communicate and settle payments directly; Circle supplies the network technology layer. - Arc is a purpose‑built blockchain Circle designed for stablecoin payments, FX, treasury activity and capital markets. Circle’s 2026 roadmap places Arc, USDC, developer tools and CPN into a single platform, with Arc intended as a coordination layer for payments, foreign exchange and capital flows. Potential impact—and unanswered questions The IBM patents could strengthen Circle’s ability to protect its stack or give it leverage in future license or cross‑licensing negotiations. But Circle hasn’t said whether the acquisition will alter current products, lower development costs, generate licensing revenue, or trigger legal action against rivals. The commercial value of the portfolio remains unreported. Agentic finance, AI and nanopayments Circle also linked the buy to its agentic finance efforts. In May the company unveiled the Circle Agent Stack—wallets and services that let software agents hold funds, follow spending rules and pay for digital resources using USDC nanopayments (Circle says transfers can be as small as $0.000001 via Circle Gateway). Arc and USDC have been tied to AI‑focused payment infrastructure in Circle’s tests: as previously reported, Arc’s testnet handled more than 244 million transactions by May. The IBM portfolio includes patents for secure cloud operations and enterprise infrastructure that could overlap with systems used by autonomous financial software, but Circle hasn’t mapped specific patents to Agent Stack components. Competitive and strategic context Circle faces broad competition: banks, fintechs and crypto firms are launching their own tokens, settlement rails and machine‑payment systems. In July, more than 140 companies backed Open USD, a collaborative stablecoin model. Owning a large patent trove gives Circle defensive options against infringement claims and a potential basis for licensing deals, but the company has not committed to either path. Next steps IBM and Circle said they will “explore further commercial opportunities” following the transfer, but provided no details about potential joint projects, whether IBM might adopt Circle products like CPN or Arc, or a timeline for integrating the patents into Circle’s engineering and product plans. For now, Circle has taken ownership of a sizeable set of issued patents as it pushes beyond stablecoin issuance—how those assets translate into product changes, licensing income or market advantage remains to be seen. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news