Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.49T
Market Cap
$2.49T
24h Trading Volume
$74.07B
BTC Dominance
56.82%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Binance Sues WSJ, Faces Capitol Hill Scrutiny Over Alleged $1B Iran Sanctions Link
Binance’s legal attack on the Wall Street Journal collided head-on with Capitol Hill scrutiny this week — and the timing could hardly be worse for the world’s largest crypto exchange. What happened - Binance filed a defamation lawsuit alleging a recent WSJ report published “false and defamatory” claims about the company. The story said federal prosecutors are probing whether Iran-linked entities used Binance to move roughly $1 billion through the platform to evade U.S. sanctions. The Department of Justice has not publicly confirmed the probe; Binance says the WSJ account is incorrect. - Within hours, Senators Elizabeth Warren, Chris Van Hollen and Ruben Gallego issued a joint warning that they will closely monitor any DOJ investigation “like hawks.” The trio signaled they’re prepared to compel documents and witnesses — and to escalate oversight if the department appears to be dragging its feet or quietly shelving the matter. Why this matters Binance’s past makes the allegation especially sensitive. In 2023 the exchange pleaded guilty to anti-money-laundering and sanctions violations and agreed to a $4.3 billion settlement. That enforcement history is a big reason lawmakers say they won’t take any new allegations lightly: they want to know whether enforcement rigor has slipped and whether Binance’s compliance regime is actually effective. What each side says - Binance frames the lawsuit as both reputational defense and a challenge to journalistic methodology, accusing reporters of cherry-picking data and presenting unverified allegations as fact. - Senators frame their oversight as focused and practical: did Binance do enough to block sanctioned accounts, were its compliance tools used in good faith, and did internal warnings reach decision-makers? What could happen next Legal and enforcement experts say this is the kind of episode that can move quickly from press statements to formal oversight: letters from senators can turn into subpoenas, depositions, and requests for records — including materials tied to the monitorship Binance has been operating under since its 2023 settlement. That could mean former executives and internal witnesses being called before Congress or its staff. The DOJ has remained publicly silent so far. With a defamation suit in court and high-profile senators promising aggressive oversight, the WSJ story — and whatever the DOJ may or may not be investigating — has become a flashpoint for accountability in crypto compliance. The situation is unfolding; expect further developments as courts, regulators and Congress weigh in. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Bitcoin Holds Above $71K Amid Middle East Tensions, Eyes $73K Resistance and Fed
Bitcoin is holding above $71,000 even as the Middle East conflict enters its third week, highlighting the market’s growing resilience to geopolitical shocks. On Saturday morning BTC traded around $71,000, down about 0.7% in 24 hours after U.S. strikes hit military targets on Kharg Island — Iran’s main crude export facility. That pullback followed a brief march toward $73,838 on Friday; bitcoin gave back roughly 3.5% on the Kharg headlines but the sell-off was limited. A month ago, a similar escalation would likely have sparked a much deeper drop. The weekly performance underscores the theme of durability. Over the past seven days: - Bitcoin is up about 4.2% - Ether gained 5.5%, trading near $2,090 - Dogecoin rose 5% - Solana added 4.2% to around $88 - BNB climbed 4.5% to roughly $655 Traders say the market has adapted. Early in the conflict, every headline produced outsized moves because tail risk was unpriced. Now investors are operating with a working script: strikes push oil higher, bitcoin dips, then recovers. That reflexive “sell the headline” response has diminished — though a $73,000–$74,000 resistance zone has now repelled BTC four times in two weeks. Politics injected a fresh layer of uncertainty late Friday when former President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that he had spared oil infrastructure “for reasons of decency” but would “immediately reconsider” if Iran continued blocking the Strait of Hormuz. Iran warned any attack on energy facilities would bring retaliatory strikes on U.S.-linked targets — a conditional escalation that could worsen what the IEA has already called the largest energy supply disruption in history if oil infrastructure is targeted. Derivatives activity reflected the two-way session. Over the past 24 hours roughly $371 million was liquidated, with short liquidations ($207 million) outpacing long liquidations ($163 million) as Friday’s surge initially squeezed bears before the Kharg headlines pressured newly opened longs. All eyes now turn to the Fed meeting on March 17–18. With oil trading above $100 and the region embroiled in a widening conflict, the risk of stagflation is getting harder to ignore. The CME FedWatch tool still prices better than a 95% chance the Fed will hold rates at 3.50%–3.75%, but the dot plot and Jerome Powell’s press conference will matter more than the decision itself. Any signal that rate hikes could return would likely hit risk assets, including crypto markets that have been pricing in cuts that haven’t yet arrived. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Cambridge study: Bitcoin survives random cable cuts — chokepoints and top hosts are the real threat
A new study from the Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance delivers the first long-term, data-driven look at how resilient Bitcoin is to physical infrastructure damage — and the picture is both reassuring and sobering. Using 11 years of peer-to-peer network data and 68 verified submarine cable fault events, researchers simulated thousands of failure scenarios to see what it would take to significantly fragment the Bitcoin network. They ran 1,000 Monte Carlo simulations per scenario and compared real-world outages to modeled attacks and random failures. The headline: Bitcoin is extremely robust to random infrastructure failures. Between 72% and 92% of inter-country submarine cables would need to be cut simultaneously before the network sees major node disconnection. In the dataset of 68 real cable incidents, more than 87% caused under 5% node impact. The single largest event — seabed disturbances off Côte d’Ivoire in March 2024 that damaged 7–8 cables — disrupted 43% of regional connectivity but only knocked offline about 5–7 Bitcoin nodes globally, roughly 0.03% of the network. Correlation between cable outages and Bitcoin price was effectively zero (-0.02), meaning infrastructure hits are invisible against normal market noise. But resilience depends on the adversary. The study draws a crucial distinction between random failures (storms, accidents) and targeted actions (coordinated state attacks or regulatory shutdowns). If an attacker focused on the cables with the highest betweenness centrality — the chokepoints that fiber traffic must pass through — the threshold for damage falls to about 20% cable removal. Worse, targeting the five hosting providers that host the most Bitcoin nodes — Hetzner, OVH, Comcast, Amazon, and Google Cloud — requires removing just 5% of routing capacity to produce the same disruptive effect. That asymmetry reframes the threat model: natural disruptions are unlikely to knock Bitcoin offline, but a concentrated campaign against specific undersea routes or a few dominant hosting providers could materially degrade the network. The paper also traces how resilience has evolved. Bitcoin was most geographically distributed and robust in 2014–2017 (critical failure threshold 0.90–0.92). Rapid growth and geographic concentration during 2018–2021 drove resilience down, hitting a low of 0.72 in 2021 amid mining concentration in East Asia. The 2021 China mining ban forced redistribution and resilience rebounded to 0.88 in 2022, settling at about 0.78 in 2025. One counterintuitive finding involves TOR. In 2025, 64% of Bitcoin nodes used TOR, making their physical locations unobservable. Previous assumptions held that hidden TOR nodes could mask geographic concentration and thus unseen fragility. Cambridge’s four-layer model found the opposite: TOR relays are heavily concentrated in Germany, France and the Netherlands — jurisdictions with dense submarine and land connectivity — making them harder to isolate. Adding TOR to the model increased the critical failure threshold by 0.02–0.10 compared with a clearnet-only baseline. The researchers describe this dynamic as “adaptive self-organization”: censorship and shutdown events (Iran’s 2019 internet blackout, Myanmar’s 2021 coup, and China’s 2021 mining ban) spurred TOR adoption, which inadvertently strengthened the network’s physical resilience without central coordination. Why this matters now: geopolitical hotspots like the Strait of Hormuz and regional conflicts raise the real possibility of undersea infrastructure disruption. The study’s takeaway is that Bitcoin would likely shrug off random cable failures — but coordinated, targeted attacks on chokepoints or a handful of major hosts remain a credible risk. Implications for the ecosystem are clear: continued geographic distribution of nodes, diversification of hosting providers and paths, and attention to chokepoints in the physical internet all matter for long-term resilience. The network has proven adaptive, but the study maps the limits of that adaptability and highlights where policymakers and operators should focus to prevent single points of failure. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Kraken Lists Pi, Sparks 30% Rally as Token Surges Ahead of Pi Day
Kraken’s decision to list Pi sent the token surging more than 30% during Asian trading hours on Friday, thrusting the project back into the spotlight just ahead of Pi Day on March 14. Kraken listing sparks big short-term move In an X post, Kraken said Pi trading would begin on March 13. That announcement — coming one day before the annually observed Pi Day — helped trigger a rapid rally: Pi climbed from about $0.2255 a day earlier to as high as roughly $0.2958, an intraday gain of just over 31%. Trading volume also picked up as traders chased the news, pushing Pi near the top of the day’s gainers. Broader exchange access, but not unanimous Kraken’s addition expands access to Pi beyond exchanges that added the token after the Open Network opened, such as OKX, Gate, and Bitget. Listings on established venues matter for a project that spent years building attention inside a closed ecosystem before enabling external trading and transfers. Background: Open Network launch and user numbers Pi moved into its Open Network phase on February 20, 2025, removing the external firewall around its mainnet. Ahead of that shift the project reported more than 19 million identity-verified users and over 10 million migrated mainnet accounts — figures the team cites to support its scale claims. Pi positions itself as a mobile-first network based on trust graphs and security circles rather than proof-of-work mining. Legitimacy questions persist after Bybit snub Despite the Kraken listing, questions about Pi’s legitimacy remain unresolved. In February 2025, Bybit CEO Ben Zhou said his exchange would not list Pi, referencing a 2023 police warning from China that he said described the project as a scam targeting elderly users. Pi replied that the warning related to bad actors falsely claiming ties to Pi Network and stressed it had no relationship with Bybit or Zhou. What traders will watch next Kraken’s listing created a fresh liquidity event and an immediate price repricing; the important test now is whether trading volume and price support hold once the initial excitement fades. For the moment, the listing widened access, lifted Pi’s price and put the token back in focus at one of the most closely watched moments on its calendar. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
20M BTC Mined: Miners Shift to AI/HPC Ahead of 2028 Halving
Bitcoin just crossed a big line: the 20 millionth BTC was mined this week, leaving roughly 1 million coins left to be issued as miner rewards. That milestone has the industry rethinking how Bitcoin mining will evolve—and what it means for miners’ business models and BTC’s long-term price dynamics. Why this matters - It took about 16 years to mine 20 million BTC; at current issuance schedules, unlocking the final 1 million could take roughly another 115 years, Wolfie Zhao, head of research at TheEnergyMag, estimates. - Miners secure the network and validate transactions by expending huge amounts of computing power and energy in exchange for newly minted coins and transaction fees. As new supply dwindles, the economics of mining and who survives in the industry are shifting fast. Mining firms pivot to AI and HPC Analysts say many publicly traded miners are already preparing for a different future. John Todaro, managing director and senior research analyst at Needham & Company, told Decrypt he expects a wave of public miners to exit Bitcoin mining in 2027–2028. He added that many are likely to sell down most of their BTC by the end of 2026 to fund capital spending on AI workloads. Why the pivot? - Low hash prices and the looming 2028 halving make traditional mining margins precarious, Todaro said—many operators are at or near breakeven. - By contrast, high-performance computing (HPC) and AI workloads can deliver much higher NOI (net operating income) margins—Todaro put HPC NOI north of 80%. NOI measures revenue minus operating expenses, excluding financing costs and taxes. - As a result, publicly traded miners the firm tracks have already reallocated portions of their compute capacity to HPC and AI. Industry examples - Bitdeer (founded by Bitmain co-founder Jihan Wu) is converting several mining facilities into AI data centers while continuing to develop next-generation mining ASICs. Bitdeer’s chief communications officer, Ross Gan, told Decrypt that miners who survive will be those that “control more of the stack” via vertical integration—designing efficient ASICs and securing long-term, low-cost energy globally. - HIVE Digital Technologies began investing in HPC infrastructure early and diversified its operations before Ethereum’s 2022 merge rendered ETH mining obsolete. Executive Chairman Frank Holmes told Decrypt that Bitcoin miners have been leaders in sourcing stranded and surplus energy and building large-scale power infrastructure; the winners, he said, will be operators that secure low-cost power and convert it into durable computing assets. What the next halving means The next halving, expected around mid-2028, will cut block rewards again—intensifying the squeeze on less-efficient miners. Todaro predicts some operators will wind down by late 2027, while Holmes argues the industry won’t disappear but the bar for survival will rise: the fittest miners will have the best power contracts, sites, and operational flexibility. And Bitcoin’s price? Block rewards eventually taper to zero by design, and investors have long known supply is finite—so much of that is arguably priced in. Satoshi’s original whitepaper compared Bitcoin issuance to gold mining: a steady addition of supply that requires resource expenditure. Todaro expects the slow, predictable reduction in new Bitcoin to moderate abrupt price impacts. He also notes that most selling pressure historically comes from newly produced BTC rather than long-term hodlers—and miners today hold a relatively small share of circulating supply (around 0.5%). By contrast, certain corporate investors control much larger stakes, meaning miners aren’t the dominant source of potential liquid supply they once were. Bottom line Hitting 20 million BTC is a symbolic turning point that puts a spotlight on mining economics. The next decade could see a reshaped industry: miners increasingly diversify into AI/HPC, vertically integrate hardware and power, and chase scale and low-cost energy. The halving countdown and slim margins will force consolidation and innovation—but they won’t necessarily end mining. The survivors will be the ones who secure the cheapest power, control more of their tech stack, and adapt to demand for profitable computing beyond pure hashpower. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Dogecoin's $1 Dream: Analysts Predict Potential 2026 Breakout Despite Technical Resistance
Dogecoin remains a long way from the $1 milestone, but some analysts say the meme coin’s next big move could still be ahead. Why $1 still feels distant - At today’s levels, Dogecoin would need roughly a 1,000% rally to reach $1. After a 2024 surge of more than 500%, the token stalled well short of the roughly $0.74 peak investors had hoped for. Rather than scaring off holders, that muted follow-through has prompted fresh cycle-based bullish forecasts. Cycle-based upside: a 2026 thesis - Crypto analyst Javon Marks argues Dogecoin’s past cycles show a pattern of major recoveries after multi-year build-ups. Marks characterizes 2023–2025 as a stagnation or accumulation phase that could set the stage for another explosive rally in 2026 if the historical trend repeats. - His scenario: a breakout from a bottom near $0.09 would launch the next leg up, with staged targets he highlights as: 1) $0.739 (a roughly 750% move from the bottom, per the analyst) 2) $1.25 (around a 1,100% rise) 3) above $1.80 (more than a 2,000% move) Technical signs of a bottom — and the caveats - A separate trader using the handle CryptoAnalystSignal on TradingView points to price action inside a descending channel on the 1-hour chart. Historically, touches of the channel’s lower boundary often trigger short-term bounces, so a move up from that zone could signal a near-term bottom. - That view comes with warnings: the Relative Strength Index (RSI) still shows bearish pressure, and significant resistance could appear around the 100‑hour moving average. The analyst suggests an initial upside target just above $0.097 before tougher resistance is met. Takeaway - Bulls are leaning on historical cycle patterns and short-term technical setups to argue that Dogecoin’s next major rally could still be coming — potentially in 2026 — but momentum indicators and moving averages temper the case. As always, these scenarios are probabilistic: traders should weigh technicals, cycle narratives, and risk management before acting. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news