Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.35T
Market Cap
$2.35T
24h Trading Volume
$141.09B
BTC Dominance
56.47%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
NY Court Fight Over 3.8M BTC — Including Satoshi Wallets — Challenges 'Abandoned' Theory
A high-stakes legal fight is heating up over what could be one of the largest claims on Bitcoin in history: roughly 3.8 million BTC — an estimated $238 billion — including addresses long tied to Bitcoin’s pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto. What happened - Attorney Ian R. Cohen filed a June 19 court rebuttal pushing back on plaintiffs’ efforts to revive a New York lawsuit that targets 39,069 Bitcoin addresses. The filing was highlighted in a June 20 X thread by Galaxy Digital research head Alex Thorn. - The suit, brought by anonymous plaintiffs using the names ABC Company, XYZ Company and Noah Doe, asks a New York court to declare dozens of long-dormant wallets “abandoned” under state law and transfer title by court order. The complaint includes some addresses historically linked to Satoshi and the “1Feex” address associated with Bitcoin stolen in the Mt. Gox breach. - New York Justice Kathy King earlier granted a stay of the case after Cohen sought to participate as amicus counsel; a hearing on that amicus application is set for July 14. Plaintiffs’ attorney David Lin has pushed to lift the stay. Cohen’s arguments Cohen argues the stay wasn’t merely procedural courtesy but an exercise of the court’s authority under New York law. More substantively, he challenges the entire legal theory behind the suit: - New York’s lost-and-abandoned property laws, Cohen says, do not apply to self-custodied Bitcoin. - Mere inactivity on-chain does not equate to abandonment — private keys, not on-chain inactivity, determine control. - Bitcoin addresses are pseudonymous, and the suit names addresses rather than identifiable people, making meaningful adversarial defense unlikely. Lifting the stay, Cohen warns, could let plaintiffs obtain default judgments against addresses without real opposition, risking control over billions in crypto. On-chain facts that complicate the plaintiffs’ case Cohen’s filing also points to concrete blockchain activity undermining the abandonment claim: the complaint itself identified addresses that later showed outbound transactions, indicating someone had access to the private keys. Galaxy’s research concurs — Thorn says his team found 52 named addresses that moved a total of 34,335 BTC, and 29 of those moved 12,302 BTC after receiving notice of the lawsuit. Industry reaction and wider implications Critics across the crypto industry have seized on the case’s jurisdictional and legal weaknesses. Ripple CTO Emeritus David Schwartz questioned how a New York court could marshal authority over decentralized, pseudonymous wallet owners spread globally. The case has raised broader fears about precedent: if courts accept the abandonment theory, it could imperil property rights over long-dormant holdings. Even discussions about future technical transitions have surfaced. Binance founder Changpeng Zhao has speculated that in a hypothetical migration to quantum-resistant systems, wallets that fail to migrate could be frozen — though he emphasized such a change would require community consensus, not unilateral action. What’s next The July 14 hearing on Cohen’s amicus application will be watched closely. At stake is more than a single lawsuit: the decision could shape how courts treat self-custodied crypto, the reach of state lost-property law over digital assets, and whether courts can effectively adjudicate claims against thousands of pseudonymous addresses. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Bio Protocol Unveils OpenLabs — AI-Powered On-Chain Research Hub, Ecosystem Raises $33M
Bio Protocol has unveiled OpenLabs, a new AI-powered research hub that aims to streamline how scientific ideas become funded projects — and it did so as its ecosystem reported more than $33 million in capital raised. The platform was announced June 19 at DeSci.Berlin 2026, held at KÖNIG GALERIE during Berlin Blockchain Week. OpenLabs combines AI-assisted project development, community funding and on-chain governance into a single interface intended to replace fragmented grant processes, separate governance tools and slow institutional review. What OpenLabs does OpenLabs provides a shared workspace where researchers, contributors and automated agents collaborate on proposals. AI-driven workflows help teams develop and refine projects, while tokenized community governance enables collective review and financing. Instead of relying exclusively on traditional grant committees and lengthy review cycles, proposals can be assessed and supported through on-chain voting using Bio Protocol’s native BIO token, which serves as the platform’s governance and utility asset. Featured projects At the launch, Bio Protocol highlighted two early projects in the OpenLabs environment: - RheumaAI — an AI agent focused on rheumatology research. - PeptAI — an AI system aimed at accelerating peptide discovery. Context in the Bio Protocol roadmap OpenLabs builds on Bio Protocol’s broader decentralized-science (DeSci) strategy, which uses tokenized intellectual property and BioDAOs to channel funding toward biotech and scientific research. The team says its BIO Genesis fundraising initiative has raised more than $33 million to date, supporting research-focused organizations across the ecosystem. The project’s work with AI-assisted research predates OpenLabs. In August 2025 Bio Protocol launched an Ignition Sale for Aubrai — developed with VitaDAO — a decentralized BioAgent designed for longevity research that can generate hypotheses and help design laboratory experiments. DeSci.Berlin itself has been a known incubator for decentralized science projects, with past editions helping spawn initiatives like Molecule Labs. Market reaction and risks Despite the launch, BIO token traded lower alongside the broader crypto market, falling more than 8% in the past 24 hours as investors reacted to a hawkish tone from Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh and uncertainty around a proposed U.S.-Iran peace framework. Regulatory and commercialization challenges remain important caveats. Tokenized IP and DeSci models touch securities laws, patent regimes and pharmaceutical oversight. As projects move from early research to commercial development, legal and compliance requirements could become more complex for teams operating in the decentralized science space. Why it matters OpenLabs represents a concrete step toward embedding AI and on-chain governance into the research lifecycle — promising faster iteration and more democratized funding decisions. Whether the model scales will depend on regulatory clarity, community adoption and the ability of on-chain systems to meet the compliance needs of biotech and pharmaceutical development. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Chainalysis: Brazil Took In $318B On‑Chain — LATAM Crypto Hub Faces Growing Illicit Finance Risks
Chainalysis data shows Brazil received $318 billion in on-chain crypto value between July 2024 and June 2025 — roughly one-third of all crypto transaction value in Latin America — underscoring the country’s central role in regional adoption while highlighting a growing, more sophisticated illicit finance challenge. What the numbers mean - Scale: $318 billion in inbound on-chain value over 12 months places Brazil well ahead of regional peers, driven by deep liquidity, rising user activity and growing institutional interest. - Not inherently illicit: Chainalysis stresses the point that scale does not equal criminality — large, liquid markets simply attract both legitimate participants and actors seeking to move value opaquely. Illicit finance risks getting more complex - Chainalysis flags evolving laundering methods that leverage local brokers, nested services and international networks. - The report identifies specific risk vectors, including Chinese-language money laundering rings, cartel-linked flows and channels used to evade Russian sanctions. - The concern: sophistication and scale give bad actors more pathways to obscure value transfers, increasing the enforcement burden. Regulatory response — and what it means for the market - Brazil has already moved: a new authorization regime for crypto service providers took effect in 2026, with mandatory reporting requirements scheduled to begin later the same year. - For compliant firms: clearer rules can build trust, open institutional doors and reduce regulatory uncertainty. - For non-compliant operators: the new framework raises the cost and risk of staying in the market, pushing shady activity into tighter corners or out of the ecosystem entirely. Trader and market implications - Brazil remains a major adoption market, but the next phase will likely be more compliance-heavy. Exchanges and service providers that adapt could capture upside; those tied to opaque flows should expect increased scrutiny. - Practical trader note: weekend sessions often feature thinner liquidity and more narrative-driven moves, so regulatory and adoption stories can matter for sentiment even if they’re not immediate price catalysts. - Read this update as context, not a direct buy/sell signal. It ties into broader industry themes: heavier compliance pressure, easier app-based access, renewed DeFi funding, growth in tokenized real-world assets, and altcoin dynamics that still lean on Bitcoin’s direction. A final caveat - Chainalysis’ work analyzes broad on-chain trends and categories of risk; the report does not allege specific wrongdoing by named Brazilian exchanges or firms. The story is about market scale, regulatory pressure and increasingly sophisticated illicit networks around a major regional crypto hub. Source: Chainalysis. Story by the News Desk; edited by Samuel Rae. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Binance Sees 1.101T SHIB Outflow in a Month — Not a Clear Buy Signal
Title: Binance Shows 1.101 Trillion SHIB Outflow in a Month — What Traders Should Make of It Binance’s Shiba Inu balances reportedly declined by 1.101 trillion SHIB over the past month, adding a fresh exchange-flow angle to a token that remains a favorite of retail meme-coin traders. While large on its face, the raw number needs context — and some caution — before it’s treated as a directional market signal. Why exchange flows matter - Exchange balance changes are closely watched because they can hint at trader intentions. Tokens leaving exchanges may be headed to cold storage (long-term holding), private wallets, DeFi protocols, or other venues. - Crucially, outflows reduce visible exchange supply but do not prove intent by themselves: a transfer off exchange could be accumulation, staking, bridging, or simply internal movement. Why 1.101 trillion SHIB gets attention - For meme coins like SHIB — where sentiment, community momentum and liquidity can move price quickly — a nine-figure token outflow becomes part of the narrative. - The significance also depends on comparative trends. If Bitcoin and Ethereum balances on Binance rose while SHIB fell, that would point to SHIB-specific dynamics rather than a platform-wide withdrawal. Other factors that drive SHIB price - Exchange balances are only one piece of the puzzle. Burn activity, Shibarium usage, broader market risk appetite and Bitcoin’s direction all shape whether outflows translate into buying pressure. - A lower exchange balance can be bullish if it reflects genuine accumulation or long-term holding. It can be neutral if tokens were simply shifted to other venues that remain liquid. How traders should read this - Combine balance data with price structure and on-chain metrics. If SHIB holds support levels while visible sell-side supply on exchanges declines, bullish arguments strengthen. If price keeps weakening, the outflow alone may not be enough to reverse soft demand. - Watch volume, support tests, wallet activity, burn rates and DeFi flows to confirm whether the exchange-balance narrative is meaningful. Weekend trading — with thinner liquidity and more narrative-driven moves — can amplify short-term impacts, so tread carefully around headline-driven swings. Bigger picture - Treat this update as another theme shaping the current crypto landscape rather than a standalone buy or sell signal. It ties into wider trends: compliance pressure, easier app-based access to markets, renewed DeFi funding, tokenized real-world assets, and altcoin dynamics that remain sensitive to Bitcoin. Bottom line - The reported 1.101 trillion SHIB outflow from Binance is noteworthy, but not definitive. Traders should monitor supporting on-chain and market indicators before concluding that outflows equal sustained accumulation or a lasting price catalyst. Source: Report based on BSC News. Written by the News Desk; edited by Samuel Rae. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
XRP Retreats from 2025 Highs to $1.15 Support — Supply, Inflation Cloud Recovery
XRP has slipped in step with a broader crypto downturn that’s plagued markets for nearly eight months, leaving many investors nervous. After a blockbuster 2025 that saw XRP surge on the back of favorable legal news, the token has lost much of its shine — its market capitalization has slid to roughly $72 billion and price momentum remains fragile. A quick recap: XRP climbed to an all-time high of $3.65 in July 2025 following a run that began in late 2024 as signs mounted that the SEC vs. Ripple lawsuit was nearing resolution. Once the case closed in 2025, investor sentiment drove XRP’s market cap as high as about $226 billion. But the landscape has changed since, and recovery has been uneven. Supply dynamics add another layer of complexity. Coinbase’s current data shows XRP’s circulating supply at about 62 billion coins. At that supply level, XRP would need to trade near $3.22 for market cap to hit $200 billion — meaning reclaiming prior highs is not just a matter of price momentum but also supply behavior over time. Technically, XRP appears to be finding short-term support in the $1.15–$1.18 range. The token staged a brief bounce to $1.29 on June 16 but failed to sustain that move and reverted toward support. Macro forces likely contributed: the Federal Reserve held interest rates steady, while US inflation rose to 4.2% in May 2026 — a hotter print than many expected. Rising crude prices amid the US–Iran tensions were cited as a key factor pushing inflation higher. That geopolitical picture has shifted. The US and Iran reportedly reached a peace agreement, triggering a pullback in oil prices. If oil-driven inflation pressures ease, inflation readings could cool and tilt monetary policy toward rate cuts later on — a macro environment that historically helps risk assets, including crypto. What this means for investors: XRP could see renewed upside if macro conditions improve and market sentiment returns, but volatility remains high and supply changes could complicate a clean path back to prior highs. Current prices near support may represent an attractive entry for some traders, but patience and risk management are essential. This is a market still driven by headlines and macro shifts, so keep an eye on inflation data, oil markets, and broader risk sentiment when sizing positions. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Shiba Inu Overtakes Dogecoin in Tech and Ecosystem — DOGE Still Rules Memecoin Brand
The long-running rivalry between Shiba Inu (SHIB) and Dogecoin (DOGE) has become a staple of memecoin culture — but the competition is evolving beyond jokes and social media hype. Dogecoin, the original memecoin, debuted in December 2013 and benefits from being an early icon of the space. Shiba Inu, however, has spent recent years building a broader crypto ecosystem. Which approach matters more for a memecoin’s future? Here’s a clearer look. Network and technology - Dogecoin runs on its own independent blockchain, secured by a Proof of Work consensus that uses the Scrypt mining algorithm. Its architecture keeps things simple and true to the memecoin spirit, but also limits advanced programmability. - Shiba Inu is native to the Ethereum ecosystem and has launched Shibarium, a Layer-2 network. That positioning gives SHIB access to Ethereum-style smart contracts and the broader tooling of the EVM world. Smart contracts and DeFi - SHIB’s integration with Ethereum and Shibarium enables a richer smart-contract environment. The Shiba Inu project has expanded into decentralized finance with platforms such as ShibaSwap. - Dogecoin, by contrast, has only a very limited smart-contract ecosystem and minimal presence in DeFi. Products and ecosystem - Shiba Inu’s ecosystem has diversified: in addition to SHIB itself, the project includes tokens like BONE, LEASH and TREAT, and has pursued a metaverse and several Web3 games. The team has also proposed a stablecoin called SHI, initially planned to target a $0.01 peg, though its launch is reportedly on hold pending regulatory clarity. - Dogecoin currently lacks comparable product development and has not announced similar ecosystem expansions. Brand and positioning - Despite SHIB’s technical and product advancements, Dogecoin remains the dominant memecoin by brand recognition. DOGE has retained its original memecoin identity, while Shiba Inu appears to be transitioning toward a more traditional cryptocurrency and blockchain project. Bottom line Shiba Inu now leads on technical functionality, products and ecosystem breadth, while Dogecoin continues to win on legacy, brand strength and cultural resonance. Which matters most depends on whether you value community and recognition or an expanding utility-driven roadmap — both approaches have shaped the memecoin landscape. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news