Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.31T
Market Cap
$2.31T
24h Trading Volume
$70.34B
BTC Dominance
56.22%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
US Sells $13B of Seized Venezuelan Oil - Arbitrage and Volatility for Crypto Traders
Headline: US Sells $13B of Seized Venezuelan Oil After 2025 Overthrow — What It Means for Markets (and Crypto Traders) Summary: After a December 2025 military operation that toppled Nicolás Maduro, the U.S. moved to seize Venezuelan oil assets and put Washington in charge of their sale and distribution. According to the Financial Times, those sales have now generated roughly $13 billion — a figure President Donald Trump said “paid for that war many times over.” Critics accuse the administration of treating military action as an investment vehicle. Key facts and figures - The Financial Times reports the U.S. has realized about $13 billion from sales of seized Venezuelan crude. Trump made the remark about recouping war costs while speaking to reporters on Air Force One. - Energy Secretary Chris Wright told Semafor the U.S. has sold more than 150 million barrels of Venezuelan oil since the seizure. - Sales have been conducted at a discount of approximately $15 per barrel relative to prevailing market rates — a pricing incentive that helped attract buyers during a period of market uncertainty. - Geopolitical pressure — in particular conflict between the U.S. and Iran and the temporary closure of the Strait of Hormuz — pushed global oil prices above $100 per barrel, boosting the value of the seized cargoes. - Venezuela’s production and exports rose sharply after the takeover: output climbed from roughly 820,000 barrels per day (bpd) in January to about 1.23 million bpd by June 2026, and exports hit roughly 1.25 million bpd — the highest level since sanctions imposed in 2019. Policy shift and market control The Trump administration has changed how seized energy assets are managed after a military operation, moving from containment to active monetization. Washington retains control over the Venezuelan oil market established after the December 2025 takeover, a dynamic that has reshaped flows and pricing in a volatile macro backdrop. Why crypto traders should care - Commodity flows and sovereign asset seizures can create abrupt liquidity and price dislocations that ripple into broader markets, including tokenized commodity products and stablecoins collateralized by commodity exposure. - Discounts and special-sale channels create arbitrage opportunities—and compliance headaches—for exchanges and token platforms that touch oil-backed instruments. - Rapid shifts in supply from a major exporter like Venezuela can feed volatility into correlated assets, including commodity-focused crypto funds and derivatives. Sources: Financial Times; Semafor. Critics of the policy argue the White House is effectively monetizing war, while the administration frames the sales as recovery of operational costs and stabilization of supply during global disruptions. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
UK Gen Z Priced Out of Homes — Could Crypto, DeFi & Tokenized Property Be the Fix?
Headline: Gen Z Shut Out of UK Homeownership — Could Crypto Be Part of the Answer? A new analysis of UK housing, employment and wealth data paints a stark picture for younger adults: today’s Gen Z faces far worse odds of owning a home than previous generations. Rising rents and unaffordable house prices have pushed more than 40% of Gen Z adults back into their parents’ homes, and only 15% can currently afford to buy a house in today’s most expensive market. By contrast, around 45% of people aged about 25 in the late 1980s could afford to buy a home — a dramatic shift in affordability over the past 45 years. The study focused on adults born between 1997 and 2001 to capture young people who are entering the workforce; those younger than this cohort are largely still in or just out of college. Several economic pressures are cited as driving the squeeze: stagnant wages, fierce job-market competition, lay-offs and hiring freezes have all limited earning potential for young adults. Even those in this generation who do manage to buy face new hurdles — mortgage rates are near multi-decade highs, and lenders increasingly stretch home loans beyond 25 years, reducing savings capacity and prolonging debt burdens. The emotional impact is clear. “People say your 20s are the best years of your life. And these are the worst years of my life, by far,” 26-year-old Adam Daytona told the BBC, reflecting a sentiment that’s becoming more common among younger buyers. Why crypto platforms should care: prolonged housing unaffordability is reshaping how Gen Z approaches money. Some are turning to alternative asset classes, digital savings strategies and decentralized finance products to try to preserve wealth, access yield, or build down payments. Meanwhile, interest is growing in innovations like property tokenization and blockchain-based housing finance as potential long-term tools to increase liquidity and lower barriers to investment — though these remain early-stage and come with regulatory and volatility risks. Bottom line: the housing gap between young people and previous generations is widening in the UK. That squeeze is not only a social and economic issue — it’s also influencing the financial behavior of a generation that could accelerate demand for crypto-native solutions, while underscoring the importance of clear regulation and risk education. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Myanmar OKs Law Targeting Crypto-Linked Scam Networks; Key Provisions Still Opaque
Myanmar’s parliament approved a sweeping anti-online scam law on July 28 that could reshape how the country—and international partners—tackle crypto-linked fraud and scam centres, but key details remain opaque. What passed - The Pyidaungsu Hluttaw (combined Parliament) adopted the reconciled Anti-Online Scam Bill after the lower and upper chambers agreed on amendments. - State media confirmed passage, but as of July 29 the final text, any presidential assent notice and a start date had not been published, leaving exact penalties and operational rules uncertain. What’s in the draft (and likely carried forward) - The 63-section draft published in May targeted digital-currency fraud, organised online scam centres, forced scam labour and the financial/telecom infrastructure that supports fraud networks. - Proposed penalties ranged from 10 years to life imprisonment for running scam centres or committing “digital currency fraud.” The draft also criminalised recruitment, financial facilitation and telecommunications support tied to organised online fraud. - For use of violence, torture, unlawful detention or cruel treatment to coerce people into scam work, the draft allowed life imprisonment or the death penalty, with capital punishment mandatory where the conduct resulted in death. A lower-house lawmaker told AFP the death-penalty provision was retained and that “not many significant changes” were made to the bill’s key sections. - The draft would create a central committee, regional bodies and an Anti-Scam Centre, enable information sharing between banks, telcos and state agencies, authorise coordination with foreign governments, and set out procedures for freezing suspicious accounts and confiscating proceeds and equipment. Human-rights and oversight concerns - Human Rights Myanmar warned the bill could be repurposed as a tool of repression, citing broad surveillance powers, account-freezing and website-blocking authorities that might be used against journalists, civil society and political opponents. The group also highlighted concerns about capital punishment and the absence of independent oversight. These critiques remain difficult to evaluate until the final law and implementing rules are published. Why this matters to crypto markets and enforcement - The law targets the crypto infrastructure and cross-border payment routes used by scam networks and could empower authorities to identify and freeze illicit crypto holdings—tools already used in recent cases. - U.S. authorities in April charged two Chinese nationals over an alleged crypto-investment fraud compound in Myanmar and announced restraints on roughly $700 million in cryptocurrency, alongside website seizures. U.S. seizures also included a fraudulent investment domain linked to a Burma compound. India is also investigating alleged trafficking of its citizens into Myanmar to work in crypto scams. - Effective enforcement will require banks and telecoms to build reporting and information-sharing systems, plus significant international cooperation because victims, operators, payment channels and digital assets routinely cross borders. The broader context: scam-centre networks remain active - Satellite analysis reviewed by Wired found at least 25 suspected scam sites built or expanded around Myawaddy in the first half of 2026. The International Justice Mission said this construction indicates prior crackdowns did not dismantle the networks. - A UN Office on Drugs and Crime assessment in July reported fraud groups are adapting to raids by dispersing, relocating and moving to smaller, more evasive operations. What’s next - Publication of the final amended law should clarify whether the president has assented, when the law takes effect, which agencies get enforcement powers and whether transitional provisions apply. - The real test will be enforcement: will authorities pursue senior operators and the financial networks that sustain them, protect trafficking victims, and apply due process—rather than relying mainly on raids that target low-level workers? No clear crypto-market price moves have been directly tied to the parliamentary vote so far. For the crypto industry and investigators, the focus will be on the legal text, how it’s implemented, and whether it actually disrupts the cross-border financial flows that sustain Myanmar-linked scam operations. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
SPCX Drops to All‑Time Low After Starship Win — Key Risks for Crypto Investors
SpaceX’s newly public shares hit a jolt of turbulence this week: SPCX plunged to an intraday low of $108.66 on Monday and closed at $113.50 — roughly 50% below June’s post-IPO peak of $225.64. The slide came despite a largely successful Starship test flight, leaving investors to ask whether this “all-time low” marks a buying opportunity or the start of something deeper. Shares recovered a bit on Tuesday, finishing at $116.41 (up 2.56%, or $2.91), after trading as high as $118.13. Why the disconnect between launches and the stock? - Operational wins didn’t help the stock: Starship’s 13th test flight lifted off Friday from Starbase, Texas, deployed all 20 Starlink V3 satellites and produced what observers called one of the softest ocean splashdowns yet — but the market still punished SPCX. - Structural concerns loom larger than launch headlines. Investors are anxious about SpaceX’s pivot away from Falcon 9 — long the company’s reliable cash generator — toward Starship, which is capital intensive and still scaling. That strategic shift is central to the current selloff. - Valuation pressures and heavy AI-related spending have added to uncertainty for 2026 forecasts. At the time of writing, SPCX is trading below its $135 IPO price, even as Wall Street’s 12-month average target remains broadly bullish at roughly $236.71. What analysts are saying - Dan Huot celebrated the milestone with a light touch: “I’m a little over the moon right now. Lucky number 13.” - Alexander Morris, CEO of F/m Investments, summed up the mixed picture: “You’re going to see double digits in stock price, and that’s probably not a terrible thing. But long term, SpaceX doesn’t really have a natural competitor base. They have a good product with an intergalactic-sized moat… That said, there’s a lot of AI hooks shoved into that same package, and that’s where we’re seeing the volatility.” - Mike Zaccardi, a top-ranked investor on TipRanks, sees parallels with other major IPOs: the market often sells off early and rewards patient holders later. He also notes that the upcoming lockup expirations are visible in investor calendars and may already be priced in. What will decide the next leg? Earnings, the lockup schedule, and how quickly Starship can ramp its flight cadence are the three factors most likely to shape SPCX’s 2026 outlook. Analysts say any meaningful recovery depends on the market’s confidence in SpaceX’s revenue transition from Falcon 9 to a Starship-dominated future. Why crypto-watchers should care SpaceX’s Starlink footprint and Starship’s potential to lower launch costs matter to the crypto and Web3 worlds. Satellite internet can improve node connectivity in remote regions, support decentralised applications beyond terrestrial infrastructure, and enable new satellite-based blockchain use cases. Those are potential medium- to long-term benefits rather than immediate drivers of SPCX’s share price, but they’re part of the broader ecosystem investors will be watching. Bottom line The stock’s drop to an all-time low is a clear warning signal, but Wall Street is divided on what comes next. A bounce or a sustained recovery could hinge less on individual successful flights and more on demonstrated revenue stability, capital allocation around Starship, and the cadence of upcoming corporate milestones. For traders and crypto-adjacent investors alike, the coming weeks’ earnings, lockup events, and launch schedule will likely dictate whether this is a buying window or the beginning of a longer downturn. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Gate US Joins BitGo Go Network OES, Letting Institutions Trade with Regulated Custody
Gate US has joined BitGo’s Go Network Off-Exchange Settlement (OES) service, linking the U.S. arm of the crypto exchange to BitGo’s custody-and-settlement infrastructure and giving eligible institutional clients access to Gate US liquidity while keeping assets in regulated custody. Key facts - The integration went live on July 28 and extends a broader partnership the companies announced five days earlier. - BitGo will provide institutional custody, wallet management and risk-control technology while Gate US continues to operate the market and execute orders. Financial terms, expected volume and a rollout timetable for the OES connection were not disclosed. How the connection works - Institutions earmark part of their balance held at BitGo Bank & Trust for trading on Gate US. - BitGo projects that available balance to Gate US for order execution; the underlying assets remain in segregated custody at BitGo until settlement. - Completed trades settle through BitGo’s Go Network off-chain rather than requiring customers to transfer assets into an exchange wallet before each trade. BitGo’s documentation says assets remain in its cold-storage system throughout this lifecycle. What Gate US and BitGo say - Gate US COO Laura Liu described the connection as providing clients “a framework built around regulated custody” and called it a “secure and efficient path” — language presented as the company’s claim. - BitGo’s role: custody and settlement via BitGo Bank & Trust (a national trust bank chartered and regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency). Gate US retains market operation and order execution. Regulatory and charter notes - BitGo’s conversion from a South Dakota trust company to a national trust bank became effective Dec. 12, 2025, per OCC records. The charter permits fiduciary and custodial services but does not make digital assets eligible for federal deposit insurance. - Gate US says it holds 36 state money-transmitter licenses and serves 47 U.S. jurisdictions. Its legal disclosures also note cryptocurrency accounts are not covered by FDIC or SIPC protections. Risks and limits of off-exchange settlement - Keeping assets with a regulated custodian instead of on an exchange can lower exposure to venue insolvency, withdrawal freezes or custody breaches. - But BitGo’s SEC filing stresses that OES services still create operational, regulatory and counterparty risks — including trade-data errors, delayed transfers, insider misconduct, cyber incidents, tech outages and reconciliation failures. A participating exchange or its clients could also fail to meet obligations or provide inaccurate data. - Those disclosures temper claims that off-exchange custody removes counterparty exposure entirely: settlement still depends on BitGo’s systems, Gate US execution records and enforceable agreements between the parties. Context and comparisons - The model mirrors traditional markets where a custodian holds assets while a separate venue executes trades. OKX US added BitGo OES in April; Binance has connected to Anchorage Digital’s Atlas under a similar structure. - BitGo now lists Gate US alongside venues such as Crossover Markets (CROSSx), Deribit (via Copper ClearLoop), Finery Markets, Gate Global, HTX, INX, KuCoin, OKX US and STS Digital. Clients may trade directly with connected venues or use BitGo Prime for aggregated access to exchanges, market makers and OTC liquidity providers. BitGo markets this expanding setup as its “Global Liquidity Layer,” a strategic description rather than a regulated market category. What’s missing and what to watch - The announcement did not specify which assets will be supported on Gate US via OES, margin mechanics, settlement frequency, default procedures, OES fees, or performance metrics. The firms also have not disclosed expected trading volume or a rollout schedule. - The next measurable updates to watch are the start of client activity on Gate US through Go Network, the list of supported assets, and any settlement or volume data the firms publish. So far, no verified market-price reaction has been attributed to the integration. Bottom line The Gate US–BitGo OES connection is another incremental step toward institutional-style settlement infrastructure in crypto: it aims to combine regulated custody with exchange liquidity, but it leaves open key operational and disclosure questions that will determine how much value institutions actually get from the integration. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Visa Moves Beyond Cards: Stablecoin Platform, OpenUSD and Tokenized Deposits
Visa is pushing deeper into crypto while posting solid quarterly results. Key numbers first: Visa reported $11.63 billion in net revenue for fiscal Q3, a 14% year-over-year increase. Payments volume and processed transactions each rose 10%, cross-border volume climbed 13%, and adjusted earnings were $6.3 billion ($3.32 per share). But the headlines for crypto watchers came from the company’s July 28 earnings call, where Visa laid out an expansive stablecoin and tokenization roadmap. The plan ties together OpenUSD, tokenized bank deposits, multi‑chain settlement, and AI-driven commerce — and positions Visa as a connector that links banks and payment firms to these new rails, rather than as a one‑asset issuer. What Visa is building - Visa Stablecoin Platform (announced July 16): a Visa‑managed environment offering wallet infrastructure and tools to mint, hold, transfer and redeem stablecoins. It’s in beta with selected clients; no wider launch date has been set. - Settlement pilot: Visa already allows selected issuers and acquirers to settle with supported stablecoins. That pilot reached a $7 billion annualized run rate by March after a 50% quarter-over-quarter increase, and now supports nine blockchains — Ethereum, Solana, Base, Polygon, Avalanche, Stellar, Canton, Arc and Tempo. - OpenUSD (OUSD): OpenUSD will be the first asset integrated into Visa’s beta platform. Once services go live, clients will be able to connect bank accounts, create managed wallets and access mint/redemption functions for OUSD. However, Visa emphasized a longer-term “multi‑coin, multi‑chain” stance: “Our role is not to pick winners,” the company said, noting it aims to connect clients to whatever regulated systems gain adoption. External observers — for example, ARK Invest researcher Lorenzo Valente — have described Visa’s involvement with OpenUSD as more like a “soft LOI” than a full strategic wager; Visa itself has not framed it that way. Broader ecosystem moves - OpenUSD momentum: Visa, Mastercard, Coinbase and more than 140 businesses joined the Open Standard initiative backing OpenUSD. The token is expected to launch later in 2026, but final issuance volume and adoption remain unclear. - Tokenized deposits via Pismo: Visa plans to link the stablecoin platform with Pismo, the cloud banking infrastructure company it acquired in 2024. Tokenized deposits differ from typical stablecoins because they represent a customer’s claim on a specific regulated bank. Visa says this will let banks convert traditional deposits into programmable, continuously available digital money while keeping funds on bank balance sheets. The company also plans to support other third‑party tokenized‑deposit providers, but hasn’t named partners or given a timeline. AI and agentic commerce Visa sees stablecoins as a way to simplify back‑end settlement and AI agents as a way to transform the front end of commerce. The company has rolled out agent identity, token assurance and transaction‑control tools designed to let software agents pay within preset limits. It has partnered with OpenAI on agentic commerce tests and experimented with payment credentials for autonomous software — though mass adoption hinges on merchant, bank and consumer uptake plus unresolved liability, authentication and consent frameworks. Market reaction and what’s next Despite beating analyst estimates, Visa shares dipped roughly 1% in after‑hours trading following the release; that move wasn’t directly tied to the crypto commentary. Near‑term milestones to watch are expanded testing of the Visa Stablecoin Platform, more details on the Pismo tokenized‑deposit integration, and the eventual OpenUSD launch — none of which currently have firm dates. Bottom line: Visa is transitioning from a pure card network toward a role as infrastructure provider across stablecoins, tokenized deposits and agentic payments. The company is making meaningful technical and commercial moves, but it’s deliberately keeping a multi‑asset, multi‑chain posture — leaving the door open as the market decides which rails and tokens gain traction. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news