Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.71T
Market Cap
$2.71T
24h Trading Volume
$88.96B
BTC Dominance
58.30%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
SEC Sues Nathan Fuller Over $12.3M 'AI Trading Bot' Crypto Ponzi
The SEC has filed suit against Texas resident Nathan Fuller, accusing him of running a roughly $12.3 million crypto investment scheme built on bogus claims about AI-powered trading bots. What the SEC alleges - The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, says Fuller marketed passive joint-venture interests in a crypto arbitrage operation from at least October 2022 through mid‑2024. He operated through Privvy Investments LLC and used the assumed business names Privvy Investments and Gateway Digital Investments. - Fuller allegedly told about 150 investors that proprietary AI trading bots could scan crypto markets, execute high-frequency arbitrage trades, and limit losses via stop‑loss coding. Investors were promised outsized, short-term returns—generally 40%–50% in 30–45 days and, in some cases, more than 100% in under a month. - The SEC says those claims were false. Only about $380,000 (roughly 3% of investor funds) was actually used to buy cryptocurrency, and those trades were made without any of the advertised bots and produced no profits. Alleged misuse of funds and cover-ups - According to the complaint, Fuller misappropriated at least $6.2 million for personal expenses, including a home, gambling, travel, and vehicles, and used roughly $5.5 million to make “Ponzi‑like” payouts to earlier investors. - When investors questioned withdrawals, the SEC alleges Fuller fabricated account statements, referenced fictitious entities, and even used AI to create a fake letter from an auditing firm claiming accounts were “under review” and would be liquidated into a trust. Charges and remedies sought - The SEC charged Fuller with violating federal securities registration and antifraud provisions. It is seeking permanent injunctions, disgorgement, civil penalties, and a ban on participating in future securities offerings. Related bankruptcy action - The SEC’s lawsuit follows a separate bankruptcy proceeding in which the Justice Department reported that Fuller was denied discharge of more than $12.5 million in debt after admitting he ran Privvy as a Ponzi scheme and fabricated documents, according to court records cited by the DOJ. Why it matters - The case highlights ongoing regulatory scrutiny of crypto investment products that invoke “AI trading bots” and guaranteed returns—appeals that continue to surface in alleged frauds across the space. The SEC’s suit underscores the risks investors face when promised rapid, high-yield returns without transparent operations or verifiable trading activity. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Market Slows, Binance Doubles Down: Aims for 3B Users by 2030 with Institutional Push
When the market slows, Binance is doubling down. In an interview with CoinDesk, Catherine Chen, Binance’s head of VIP and Institutional, laid out an ambitious roadmap aimed at growing the exchange’s active user base tenfold to 3 billion by 2030 — even as the crypto industry grapples with a prolonged downturn and competitors retrench. “It is true, the market is going through a hard time,” Chen told CoinDesk, noting a wave of regulatory developments and rivals “either struggling or perhaps shifting their focus.” Coinbase, for example, cut roughly 14% of its workforce — nearly 700 employees — earlier this year amid soft market conditions and competition from AI-driven innovations, part of broader industry layoffs. Market backdrop and Binance’s position Bitcoin remains below the symbolic $100,000 level it hasn’t seen since mid-November, and the broader crypto market cap sits around $2.7 trillion — roughly 40% below its pre–October flash crash peak of $4.38 trillion. Yet Binance says it is weathering the slump. Chen reports the exchange serves more than 310 million “actual active individual users,” a figure she emphasizes is based on stringent KYC and corporate KYB verification, not simple registrations. Binance is widely regarded as the largest crypto exchange by trading volume and registered users, though CoinGecko currently ranks it second by daily trading volume at about $7 billion. Institutional push: closing the infrastructure gap Chen framed the current pullback as an opportunity to build the institutional plumbing crypto has long lacked. She highlights a stark spending imbalance: traditional finance firms invest north of $2 billion annually in advanced order management systems (OMS), while crypto infrastructure spend is roughly $185 million — less than a tenth. Binance’s new OMS toolkit aims to close that gap by bundling institutional-grade flow analytics and execution tools through partnerships with Coin Metrics, Talos, and 3Commas. “Financial institutions are increasingly merging with crypto exchanges and blockchain infrastructure providers,” Chen said. “They don't want to be building all that infrastructure themselves.” Triparty framework and tokenized real-world assets Beyond trading systems, Binance is tackling a core institutional pain point: custody and counterparty risk. Institutional clients often don’t want to custody crypto themselves or leave capital sitting on an exchange; they prefer to hold fiat or fiat-equivalents with established banking partners. To address that, Binance has quietly integrated “triparty” workflows and sovereign-grade asset management rails that accept tokenized money market funds from BlackRock and Franklin Templeton as eligible collateral inside its triparty ecosystem. This lets institutional traders pledge yield-bearing, tokenized shares in real time — avoiding manual treasury rollovers and heavy admin fees — effectively using tokenized short-term funds to back trading operations. Chen expects tokenization of real-world assets (RWA) to accelerate over the next 12–18 months, arguing tokenization improves accessibility without changing an asset’s fundamental characteristics or price. Crypto-as-a-Service and client traction Binance also launched a Crypto-as-a-Service (CaaS) platform in September aimed at financial institutions exploring digital assets. Chen says more than 15 major financial institutions have engaged the service since the rollout. The build-through-the-downturn strategy Chen’s message is pragmatic: while retail-driven price moves command headlines, Binance is focused on long-term infrastructure and institutional adoption. “Whenever the market is bad, it is always the best time for us to build,” she said. “We are building and positioning ourselves to 10x our user base when people aren't noticing — and then, hopefully, we are already there.” Whether Binance’s bet on institutional tooling, triparty custody, and RWA tokenization will prove decisive remains to be seen, but the exchange is clearly positioning itself to capture the next wave of crypto growth — not by chasing short-term rallies, but by building the plumbing institutions say they need. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Warsh Paper Names XRP a Cross‑Border "Bridge" — Fed & DTCC Moves Could Supercharge Ripple
Tom, the founder of OpenFind, has spotlighted a 2022 research paper co‑authored by incoming Federal Reserve Chair Kevin Warsh that explicitly highlights XRP as a potential liquidity bridge for cross‑border payments. In an X post, Tom pointed to the paper’s discussion of crypto assets — naming XRP by example — as a “bridge currency” that could help move value between stablecoins and national currencies. The authors also argue that private‑sector payment infrastructure should not be excluded from future digital money systems, a point Tom says underlines how companies like Ripple are becoming indispensable pieces of the global financial plumbing after decades of positioning. What the paper proposed - The paper explored a model in which a Special Drawing Rights (SDR)‑based stablecoin could be exchanged for any national currency. The authors noted that such an arrangement could resemble the cross‑border rails Ripple operates today, where XRP can be used as an on‑demand bridge to convert between currencies. Ripple’s role and industry views - XRP functions as the bridge asset in Ripple’s cross‑border payment service: customers can swap local currency for XRP and then convert XRP into the destination currency. Ripple CTO David Schwartz has previously argued that XRP offers advantages over stablecoins for these flows because there is no single, universal consensus stablecoin to settle transactions globally. Regulatory context - Kevin Warsh, who has expressed a generally pro‑crypto stance and disclosed crypto holdings prior to his nomination hearing, could soon have direct regulatory oversight affecting firms like Ripple. Ripple has applied for a Fed master account, and the Fed is reportedly considering a “skinny” master account model that would give crypto firms access to central bank payment rails — a development that could materially affect how tokenized and cross‑border transactions settle. Institutional plumbing and tokenized securities - Market commentators are also watching Ripple’s institutional push. X user “Finance Bull” highlighted that Ripple Prime has been confirmed as part of the DTCC’s blockchain ecosystem. The DTCC clears roughly $114 trillion in securities annually and is moving toward near‑continuous (24/5) U.S. equities processing. If DTCC’s tokenization efforts route settlement through infrastructures like Ripple Prime and the XRP Ledger, that could create sizable new rails and volumes — something the market may not yet have fully priced in. Market reaction - At the time of writing, XRP was trading around $1.35, up just over 3%, according to CoinMarketCap. Bottom line: the Warsh‑coauthored paper puts XRP squarely in the conversation about future cross‑border liquidity and hybrid public/private payment infrastructures, while ongoing regulatory and institutional developments — from potential Fed master accounts to DTCC tokenization — could accelerate real‑world use cases for Ripple’s stack and XRP as a bridge asset. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Institutional BTC Moves to Coinbase Prime Raise Supply Risk as Bitcoin Tests $72–75K
Bitcoin is struggling to hold above $75,000 as market direction remains uncertain, and a fresh institutional wallet development adds a tangible supply angle to the pressure. Analyst Axel Adler has traced a set of transfers into Coinbase Prime that don’t prove selling but do move large, previously "offline" balances into infrastructure that’s one step closer to the market. What moved and when - On May 28, 7,048.324 BTC traveled from IBIT wallets through a BlackRock Coinbase Prime deposit address into Coinbase Prime custody. Adler’s chain-tracking shows this was a logistical repositioning—not an internal bookkeeping swap but a deliberate movement from storage into a venue where liquidity is accessible. - Separately, two Strategy‑affiliated wallet transfers of 206.169 BTC and 205.312 BTC were received by an intermediate address and, about 15 minutes later, the combined 411.480 BTC was sent to Coinbase Prime. While the intermediate address isn’t explicitly labeled, the transaction trail is clear enough to attribute the flow to Strategy-linked funds. Why it matters (and what it doesn’t prove) - Moving coins into Coinbase Prime doesn’t automatically equal a market sale. Large institutions routinely shift Bitcoin into exchange-adjacent custody for reasons such as rebalancing, collateral management or operational needs. - The net effect, however, is a measurable supply overhang: coins that were in cold storage are now closer to the order book. The critical unanswered question is whether demand at and below $75,000 is sufficient to absorb whatever portion of that supply the institutions decide to sell. Market context and technical picture - Bitcoin is trading near $73,700 on the weekly timeframe, testing the $72,000–$74,000 zone—a major support area that previously acted as resistance during the recovery from February’s lows. - After peaking above $120,000 in late 2025, BTC corrected toward the $63,000–$66,000 demand zone, where buyers defended aggressively in February and set the stage for the March–April recovery. The current retest of the $72k–$74k band is therefore a pivotal moment: bulls need to hold it to preserve the sequence of higher lows since February. - Moving averages offer a mixed signal. Price sits below the 50-week and 100-week moving averages, signaling medium-term pressure, yet remains well above the rising 200-week moving average near $61,000—meaning the longer-term bull structure has not been invalidated. - Volume during this pullback has been relatively muted, suggesting the move hasn’t been driven by large-scale capitulation. If buyers defend the zone, a renewed push toward $80,000 is plausible. A failure below $72,000 would likely refocus attention on the $63,000–$66,000 support region where 2026 showed its strongest demand. The takeaway Axel Adler’s on-chain work clarifies that significant institutional coins were deliberately moved into Coinbase Prime infrastructure on the same day from two different sources. That state change increases the potential supply available to the market, even if it isn’t a de facto sale. Over the next sessions, price action and volume will reveal whether current demand can absorb that supply or whether the market will be forced to test lower support levels. What to watch - Exchange inflows to Coinbase Prime and other major custodians - Price at $72,000–$74,000 (support) and $80,000 (near-term resistance) - Volume spikes accompanying directional moves - Behavior around the 50-week / 100-week moving averages and the 200-week MA near $61,000 Image: chart data from TradingView.com. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
SpaceX Wins $4.16B Space Force Sensor Contract — Big Boost for IPO, Space Tokens
SpaceX just landed a major national-security win: the US Space Force awarded the company a $4.16 billion contract to accelerate a “space‑based sensing layer” for its Space‑Based Airborne Moving Target Indicator (SB‑AMTI) program, according to a Friday release from Space Systems Command. What the deal covers - The $4.16B award is intended to speed deployment of a satellite constellation that will help detect and track airborne targets from space, reducing operational blind spots in contested airspace. The Space Force says the system is projected to be fielded by 2028. - “By focusing these capabilities to the space domain, we are providing the Joint Force with sustained battlespace awareness of contested airspace,” said Col. Ryan Frazier, acting Space Force portfolio acquisition executive for Space Based Sensing & Targeting. Why it matters - The award comes just days after SpaceX won a separate $2.29 billion contract to build the Space Data Network backbone — a mesh communications constellation designed to shuttle data across military satellite networks. Together, the two contracts position SpaceX as a central provider of both sensing and communications for the Pentagon’s evolving space architecture. - The Air Force isn’t retiring airborne surveillance platforms like the E‑3 AWACS and E‑7 Wedgetail, but officials increasingly view space‑based capabilities as a critical complement to aircraft-based ISR. Market and investor angle (relevant to crypto and digital-asset readers) - SpaceX is reportedly preparing for an IPO this year, and large, government-backed contracts like these can make a public offering more attractive to investors. In the current market, space-related equities and tokens have drawn heightened interest as governments ramp up spending to maintain an edge in space. - Recent setbacks elsewhere in the sector — such as the Blue Origin launch anomaly — may temper sentiment for some players, but SpaceX appears to be consolidating a leadership role that could influence capital flows into space-focused equities and related investment vehicles, including any tokenized or security‑token offerings tied to space infrastructure. Bottom line This pair of Pentagon awards cements SpaceX’s growing role in military space infrastructure — both as a sensor provider and as a communications backbone — and could be a meaningful catalyst for investor interest ahead of a potential IPO. Crypto and digital-asset markets that track or tokenize traditional aerospace exposure will likely watch developments closely. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Lummis Warns: This Congress Is Crypto's Last Real Chance to Pass Clarity Act Before 2030
Senator Cynthia Lummis warned on May 29 that the current Congress may be the last realistic chance to pass sweeping U.S. digital-asset legislation until 2030 — and that failure to act now will leave developers and law enforcement in limbo for years. Posting on X, the Wyoming Republican wrote: “The next window for digital asset legislation after this Congress is likely 2030. Until then, developers remain exposed with no legal protections, and law enforcement remains without the tools to hold bad actors accountable. The Clarity Act solves both.” Momentum has built: the Senate Banking Committee advanced the Clarity Act on a bipartisan 15–9 vote on May 14, and the House already passed the bill 294–134. The Senate Agriculture Committee has also cleared its version, and the Trump White House has publicly labeled the bill a national priority. But Lummis and other backers caution that the road ahead remains narrow — a full Senate floor vote, reconciliation with the House version, and a presidential signature must still happen before political dynamics shift. The urgency hinges on the 2026 midterms. With the November election compressing the Senate calendar and the possibility of a House flip or changes in committee makeups, the current cross-branch alignment that has carried the bill this far could evaporate. Prediction markets reflect the uncertainty: Polymarket currently prices the Clarity Act’s passage in 2026 at roughly 58%. Supporters point to practical consequences of delay. The Clarity Act would create statutory definitions for digital assets and split regulatory authority between the SEC and the CFTC according to asset classification. Without it, the SEC continues to apply the Howey test — the decades-old securities standard — on a case-by-case basis, leaving firms and developers without clear, predictable rules. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has warned that this regulatory ambiguity is driving crypto development offshore to hubs like Abu Dhabi and Singapore. Key sticking points, however, still need to be resolved. Stablecoin yield provisions and ethics language that would ban government officials from personally profiting from crypto holdings remain among the most contested elements and must be settled before the bill can reach a president’s desk. Not everyone is pessimistic. SEC Chair Paul Atkins told Fox Business he is confident Congress will pass the bill and that President Trump will sign it. But Lummis — who has said she will not run for a second Senate term — framed the stakes starkly: without statutory clarity, American developers could face prosecution merely for publishing code. The Senate Banking Committee vote was a milestone, but the legislative finish line is tightening. With limited floor time and high-stakes policy trade-offs still unresolved, backers say this Congress is the industry’s best shot for a stable, long-term framework — or else it could be another four-year wait. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news