Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.31T
Market Cap
$2.31T
24h Trading Volume
$70.34B
BTC Dominance
56.22%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Evernorth Faces Underwater XRP Position — SPAC Redemptions Will Decide Its Fate
Evernorth looks set to list “underwater” — and the SPAC vote and redemptions will decide how big the company actually is. What’s happening - Evernorth, a Ripple-backed digital-asset treasury company, filed Amendment No. 1 to its Form S‑4, moving it closer to a Nasdaq listing under ticker XRPN. But the company’s flagship position is already trading well below what it paid for it. - The vehicle says it accumulated roughly 473 million XRP at an average cost of about $2.54 per token. XRP is trading near $1.10, leaving Evernorth with an unrealized loss of more than 50% and a material impairment recorded in its 2025 accounts. - The capital backing the deal is real and heavyweight: about $1 billion in commitments from Ripple (which contributed ~127 million XRP), SBI, Pantera, Kraken and others. That credibility is central to the bull case — but it doesn’t erase the arithmetic SPACs force on public shareholders. Why the SPAC mechanics matter — the redemption is the story - This is classic SPAC structure: public holders of the SPAC can vote to approve the business combination and separately redeem their shares for pro rata cash from the trust (usually IPO price plus interest). In practice, holders can and do redeem even when they vote yes. - For Evernorth, the choice for SPAC shareholders is stark: take cash at trust value, or accept equity in a company whose token holdings sit at a >50% unrealized deficit. Arbitrage funds and many institutional SPAC investors typically take the cash. That behavior is already visible: pro forma cash available to the combined company has fallen across filings from roughly $1.1 billion toward about $870 million — the visible effect of expected redemptions and adjustments before closing. What that means for the listing - Redemptions don’t necessarily kill the deal, but they shrink it. A smaller Evernorth would: - Hold a less meaningful XRP stake, - Have a thinner public float that discourages institutional participation, - Lose the balance-sheet scale needed to issue equity accretively — the flywheel that made treasury vehicles work in the past. - The broader treasury-company model depends on the stock trading at a premium to NAV so the company can issue shares accretively and buy more tokens. That premium has largely evaporated across the sector this year. Evernorth’s handicap is that it would be asking investors to buy a wrapper around an underwater position at a time the market is reluctant to pay premiums for even winning positions. A sober look at demand and supply - The ETFs and products that already offered institutions exposure to XRP aren’t exactly a tailwind: coverage of the spot-XRP ETF complex found cumulative inflows around $1.49 billion against ~ $997 million in net assets, leaving an unrealized deficit near $493 million — and flows decayed roughly 99% from launch. In short, a lot of institutional demand was tested in simpler products and largely cooled off. - That said, the committed investors here are credible and strategic. Ripple, SBI, Pantera, and Kraken are not casual backers. Their participation — and Ripple’s conversion of tokens into a large equity stake — is a signal of conviction that could matter if those backers hold and the vehicle keeps scale. Key things to watch (and when they’ll arrive) - Redemption figure at closing: the single most informative number. It converts investor conviction into dollars and sets the company’s initial scale. Compare any announced redemptions to the roughly $870 million pro forma and the original ~$1.1 billion. - Will committed investors backstop redemptions? Expect disclosures about forward purchase agreements, private placements, or non-redemption deals if the sponsors try to preserve scale. - Opening trade relative to NAV: the market’s first verdict on whether the wrapper is worth a premium. Trading below NAV on day one typically forecloses the accretive issuance flywheel. - Filings on lock-ups and Ripple’s disclosed position: details on any lock-up or sale plan for Ripple’s ~127 million-XRP contribution will be in the registration materials, and they’ll matter for future supply dynamics. - Any change in accumulation strategy: whether Evernorth uses remaining capital to average down or pauses buying will materially change the cost basis and narrative. Context and the honest frame - Treasury vehicles succeeded when they could buy assets at reasonable prices and trade at premiums that allowed accretive share issuance. This sector has shown it can work going up and that it struggles badly in reverse when premiums compress. - The bull case for Evernorth is straightforward and internally consistent: a treasury assembled near a cycle low, backed by credible capital, is well-positioned to benefit from a token recovery. But it requires that recovery — and enough shareholders declining cash at the gate so the company is large enough to wait for one. - The decisive moment for Evernorth is now: the shareholder redemption choices and the market’s opening trade will reveal whether it lists as a meaningful, billion-dollar vehicle or as something much smaller. Bottom line Evernorth is a high-profile test of the SPAC-to-treasury formula in a market that has already shown limited appetite for paying premiums on token wrappers. The committed capital and backers give the deal life, but the SPAC redemption mechanics put the company’s scale and strategy on the line before a single share trades. This is educational analysis, not investment advice. The transaction’s terms, timing, and completion are uncertain; figures reflect filings available as of July 29, 2026. Always do your own research. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Coinbase Names Rob Witoff CTO as Firm Goes AI-First, Faces Reliability Test
Coinbase has named long-time engineer Rob Witoff as its new chief technology officer, signaling a deeper push into AI-driven product development as the U.S. exchange reshapes its engineering model. The appointment, announced by CEO Brian Armstrong on X and now reflected on Coinbase’s leadership page, brings back a familiar face. Witoff first joined Coinbase in 2014, helped build its early infrastructure and security systems, rose to chief architect, and later founded institutional custody firm Unit 410—acquired by Coinbase. He returned to the company in December 2024 as head of platform and an executive team member; his new CTO role was made official on July 28. Armstrong lauded Witoff for helping make Coinbase “one of the most AI-enabled companies in the world,” a characterization Armstrong provided rather than an independently verified ranking. Witoff’s promotion comes amid a major reorganization at Coinbase that centers AI at the heart of software development. In May the company cut roughly 14% of its workforce—about 700 roles—flattened management and began building smaller, AI-assisted teams. Armstrong has described experiments with “one-person teams” that combine engineering, product and design, and said AI is allowing engineers to finish in days what used to take weeks. Coinbase’s own engineering report reveals the scale of the shift: the share of newly merged code that was AI-generated and human-reviewed reportedly climbed from 5.7% in Q1 2025 to roughly 100% by mid-2026, while preserving human oversight and compliance controls. The company has also instituted quarterly reviews of its AI-focused engineering interview process and 45- and 90-day assessments for new hires. Operational reliability will be central to Witoff’s remit. Coinbase has been expanding into derivatives, stablecoin payments, prediction markets and services for AI agents—products that demand robust infrastructure, security controls and fast incident response. The need for those capabilities was underscored by a roughly 50-minute outage on July 14 caused by a routine configuration update to a shared production cluster; transfers, card payments and some onchain services were interrupted, though Coinbase said customer funds were not at risk. The company later rolled out new deployment safeguards and recovery procedures. Witoff’s background in security, architecture and platform engineering aligns with those priorities, but Coinbase has not published new performance targets, budget changes or a detailed technology roadmap linked specifically to his appointment. His immediate challenge will be sustaining rapid product releases while preserving security, reliability and regulatory compliance as AI becomes more central to development. The CTO transition follows other leadership changes: Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal notified Coinbase on July 8 that he would depart on July 31; Molly Abraham is expected to become general counsel and corporate secretary, with Grewal serving as an adviser through October. Key takeaways - Rob Witoff named Coinbase CTO (announcement July 28); previously an early Coinbase engineer and founder of Unit 410. - Appointment coincides with Coinbase’s AI-first restructuring and a May workforce reduction of ~14% (~700 roles). - Coinbase reports AI-generated, human-reviewed merged code rose from 5.7% (Q1 2025) to ~100% (mid-2026). - Operational risks highlighted by a 50-minute outage on July 14; company implemented new safeguards. - Immediate priorities for the new CTO: scale AI-enabled development while maintaining security, reliability and regulatory controls. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
FCA: Stablecoins Best for Cross‑Border Transfers — Not Everyday UK Retail
The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority says stablecoins are most likely to shine in cross-border payments — not as a replacement for everyday retail spending at home. Key takeaway - After convening banks, payments firms and crypto companies in a March 2026 “Stablecoin Sprint,” the FCA concluded that the clearest, near-term commercial use for stablecoins is cross-border transfers — especially in markets that struggle to access U.S. dollars. In contrast, UK consumer adoption for routine retail payments looks limited because domestic payment rails are already fast and cheap. What the Sprint revealed - The two-day Stablecoin Sprint (about 75 attendees from banks, payment service providers, merchant acquirers, fintechs, infrastructure firms, stablecoin issuers and industry groups) found broad agreement that stablecoins can cut settlement delays and improve access to dollar-denominated flows in emerging markets or places with weak banking infrastructure. - Participants differentiated between emerging markets — where stablecoins could deliver clear advantages — and mature corridors, where existing international payment services are already efficient and low-cost. - For domestic retail, the message was blunt: UK consumers have little incentive to switch from bank transfers or card payments, which are generally inexpensive and quick. Businesses, however, saw potential benefits from lower transaction fees and faster settlement where intermediaries or delays remain a problem. Trade finance and programmability - A May trade finance roundtable and a later session with roughly 30 participants delved into programmable payments. Attendees explored how smart contract–based settlement could automate and speed commercial transactions, highlighting another niche where tokenized money could add value. How this fits into UK rules - The Sprint fed into the FCA’s broader policy work following the finalization of rules for UK-issued stablecoins on June 30, 2026. Those rules require issuers to fully back stablecoins with reserve assets and to redeem tokens at par. Feedback from the Sprint will continue to shape regulatory approaches to stablecoin payments. - The FCA also adjusted a proposed prudential requirement after industry input: the capital buffer for stablecoin issuers was cut to 1% of issued value from an earlier 2% proposal, a change the regulator said followed evidence submitted by firms. David Geale, Executive Director for Payments and Digital Finance, has commented on that revision. Timing for firms - Under the new digital assets framework published June 30, firms carrying out regulated crypto activities can apply for authorization from Sept. 30, 2026. The full regime becomes effective Oct. 25, 2027. The regime covers trading platforms, custodians, staking providers and stablecoin issuers. Existing anti-money-laundering registrations do not automatically transfer into the new licensing system. - Most sterling-denominated stablecoins will sit under FCA supervision; tokens judged systemically important would be overseen by the Bank of England. Wider regulatory debate - The Bank of England has also been reworking parts of its own stablecoin proposals after industry concerns raised in May. The central bank had suggested that issuers hold at least 40% of reserves in non-interest-bearing deposits at the BoE and considered temporary individual and corporate holding limits during rollout. Firms argued caps would be hard to enforce across wallets and trading venues and that non‑interest reserve rules could harm issuer economics. BoE Deputy Governor Sarah Breeden said the bank is reassessing whether those measures remain necessary. - BoE Governor Andrew Bailey warned that the international growth of dollar-backed stablecoins will likely require closer international regulatory coordination, flagging the U.S. as a key interlocutor for global standards. Emerging link to AI and programmability - Beyond payments policy, the FCA’s July review on the future of retail financial services flagged a potential boost to demand for programmable digital money from autonomous AI agents that can execute payments, investments and savings decisions without continuous human intervention. The review suggested stablecoins and tokenized deposits could better support machine-speed, automated settlement on distributed ledgers — while stressing that firms cannot offload legal accountability onto AI agents. Bottom line - Regulators and industry see clear niches for stablecoins — notably cross-border flows and programmable trade settlements — but mainstream retail adoption in the UK faces headwinds because incumbent payment rails remain competitive. The Sprint’s findings and ongoing consultations signal that UK policy will continue evolving as firms and authorities balance innovation, commercial viability and financial stability. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Gate US taps BitGo's Go Network OES to let institutions trade while assets stay in custody
Gate US has plugged into BitGo’s off-exchange settlement network, giving institutional clients a way to access Gate US liquidity in the U.S. while keeping assets in regulated custody. What happened - On July 28 Gate US joined BitGo’s Go Network Off-Exchange Settlement (OES) service. The move follows a broader partnership announced five days earlier in which BitGo agreed to provide institutional custody, wallet management and risk-control technology as Gate US expands its U.S. operations. - Under the integration, eligible institutions allocate part of their balances held at BitGo Bank & Trust, National Association, for trading on Gate US. BitGo “projects” the available balance to the exchange so orders can be executed while the underlying assets remain in segregated custody until settlement. - Completed trades settle through the Go Network rather than by moving assets into a conventional exchange wallet. BitGo’s technical documentation says settlements occur off-chain while assets remain in cold storage. Why it matters - The setup mirrors a traditional market model: a regulated custodian holds assets while a separate venue executes trades. That can reduce exposure if an exchange becomes insolvent, imposes withdrawal limits or suffers a custody breach, because assets are not stored in an exchange wallet. - Gate US framed the connection as a custody-focused route for institutional clients. Gate US COO Laura Liu described the service as a “secure and efficient path” (a company claim; no independent performance data was published). What remains unclear - Neither firm disclosed financial terms, expected trading volumes, a rollout schedule for the OES connection, or which assets, margin arrangements, settlement cadence, default procedures or fees will apply. - The companies have not published comparative metrics on settlement speed, failure rates or costs versus ordinary exchange deposits. Regulatory and operational context - BitGo Bank & Trust is identified by BitGo as a national trust bank chartered and regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC). The OCC database indicates BitGo’s conversion from a South Dakota trust company became effective on Dec. 12, 2025. The charter authorizes fiduciary and custodial services but does not make digital assets eligible for federal deposit insurance. - BitGo lists Gate US among a growing roster of connected venues—including Crossover Markets CROSSx, Deribit (via Copper ClearLoop), Finery Markets, Gate Global, HTX, INX, KuCoin, OKX US and STS Digital. Clients can trade directly with these venues or use BitGo Prime to aggregate access to exchanges, market makers and OTC liquidity providers. - Similar models are already in market: OKX US added BitGo OES for institutional clients in April, and Binance connected to Anchorage Digital’s Atlas platform under a comparable structure. Risks and limits - BitGo’s own SEC filing warns that OES services still carry operational, regulatory and counterparty risks: potential trade-data errors, delayed asset transfers, insider misconduct, cyber incidents, technology outages and reconciliation failures. An exchange or its clients could also fail to meet obligations or provide inaccurate transaction records. Those caveats temper claims that off-exchange custody fully eliminates counterparty exposure—the overall process still depends on BitGo’s systems, Gate US’s execution records and enforceable agreements between the parties. - Gate US states it holds 36 state money-transmitter licenses and serves 47 U.S. jurisdictions. Its legal disclosures note that cryptocurrency accounts are not covered by FDIC or SIPC protections. What to watch next - Measurable indicators of the integration’s value will include the start of client trading activity through the connection, the list of assets supported on Gate US via Go Network, and any disclosed settlement or volume figures. The companies have not announced deadlines for those disclosures, and there was no verified market-price reaction directly tied to the integration. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
BNY Mellon Launches Blockchain Transfer Agency to Put Fund Ownership Onchain
BNY Mellon is pushing deeper into blockchain for institutional finance, rolling out a blockchain-enabled version of its transfer agency business that will record fund ownership and investor transactions on a shared digital ledger. Rather than merely tokenizing products, the New York-based custodian is applying distributed ledger technology to the backbone of fund operations: the books and records that track who owns what. The Financial Times reports the platform will maintain official ownership records onchain while BNY continues to operate its existing transfer agency services. Transfer agents are central to fund mechanics — they log subscriptions and redemptions, update shareholder registers and manage investor communications. Today those records are typically spread across managers’, custodians’ and administrators’ systems, requiring frequent reconciliation. Putting the official register on a shared ledger aims to create a single source of truth, reduce duplicate databases and give authorized participants synchronized access to ownership data. Carolyn Weinberg, BNY’s chief product and innovation officer, told the FT the project modernizes the books and records supporting fund transactions by migrating them onto blockchain infrastructure. BNY’s transfer agency business already supports roughly $8.6 trillion of assets across 7.6 million investor accounts; the bank separately oversees more than $59 trillion in custody and administration. Early adopters include Edinburgh-based asset manager Baillie Gifford, which plans to use the platform for what it describes as the U.K.’s first fully native regulated tokenized fund. “What we have in the blockchain is a shared source of record-keeping between the participants. We agree that this is the source of truth when people are dealing with the asset that this is monitoring,” said Theo Golden, Baillie Gifford’s head of digital assets. Baillie Gifford manages about $261 billion in assets. The FT also says BlackRock and BNY Dreyfus’ money market and cash management business are expected to use the platform for future tokenized fund offerings. BNY has not disclosed which blockchain network will power the platform. Cointelegraph reached out to the bank but did not receive comment before publication. The transfer-agency launch builds on several digital-asset moves BNY has rolled out in recent months. In June the bank added USDC minting, redemption, custody and transfer capabilities to its Digital Asset Custody platform, giving institutional clients direct access to Circle’s stablecoin through BNY’s infrastructure; BNY already serves as the primary custodian for the assets backing USDC. The bank has also partnered with Abu Dhabi’s Finstreet and the ADI Foundation to develop institutional custody services for Bitcoin and Ether, with plans to expand to stablecoins and tokenized real-world assets. Regulatory progress in Europe has followed: the European Securities and Markets Authority recently added BNY SA/NV, the bank’s Belgian unit, to its interim Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) register after authorization from the National Bank of Belgium. That approval lets the subsidiary provide crypto-asset custody and transfer services under MiCA, positioning BNY alongside other financial institutions scaling regulated digital-asset operations across the EU. Taken together, these moves show BNY extending blockchain across multiple layers of institutional infrastructure — from regulated crypto custody and stablecoin plumbing to the operational record-keeping systems that undergird tokenized investment funds. If widely adopted, onchain transfer agency records could streamline administration, speed fund settlements and reduce operational friction as tokenized funds gain traction. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Cathie Wood's ARK Buys $40M of Tesla, Nvidia & SpaceX; Adds Solana, Warns of Crypto Shakeout
Cathie Wood’s ARK Invest used Tuesday’s tech rout as a buying opportunity, snapping up roughly $40.2 million of Tesla, SpaceX and Nvidia stock on July 28 — moves disclosed across ARK’s actively managed ETFs. What ARK bought (July 28 disclosures) - Tesla: 40,281 shares (~$12.38M at $307.44). Allocated across ARKK (26,920), ARKQ (5,785), ARKW (5,119) and ARKX (2,457). - SpaceX: 105,108 shares (~$12.24M at $116.41). Allocations: ARKK (70,773), ARKQ (15,213), ARKW (9,426) and ARKX (9,696). ARK had already added roughly $14M of SpaceX earlier in the week. - Nvidia: 78,965 shares (~$15.56M at $197.01). Bought across five ETFs: ARKK (42,072), ARKQ (13,639), ARKW (11,984), ARKF (5,471) and ARKX (5,799). Why now: market context The purchases came amid a sharp sell-off in AI- and semiconductor-linked names. Nvidia fell as investors reevaluated the cost and financing needs for AI infrastructure and briefly ceded the title of world’s most valuable public company to Apple. Other chip and data-storage names — Intel, AMD, SanDisk, Western Digital and Seagate — each slid more than 4%. Asian markets suffered steeper losses: South Korea’s Kospi plunged 10.8% (triggering a circuit breaker after an 8% drop), with Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix plunging double digits; Japan’s Nikkei fell nearly 4%. What ARK’s trades signal ARK appears to have used the pullback to expand exposure to themes it favors: autonomous vehicles (Tesla), space and defense (SpaceX) and AI/computing infrastructure (Nvidia). For U.S. investors, ARK’s ETFs provide a pooled way to gain that exposure, but the moves also heighten sensitivity to further weakness in high-valuation tech if AI spending slows or financing costs stay elevated. Crypto angle: Solana exposure and warning on consolidation ARK also modestly increased indirect exposure to Solana via the 3iQ Solana Staking ETF, buying 5,252 shares (ARKW 2,997; ARKF 2,255) valued at about $32,667 (fund price $6.22). This follows larger crypto-related activity on July 24 when ARK invested roughly $251,500 across three ETFs (including the same Solana fund and BitMine Immersion Technologies). Separately, ARK’s director of digital-assets research, Lorenzo Valente, warned the crypto industry is entering a deep consolidation phase. He asserted that two platforms — Hyperliquid and Pump.fun — accounted for 67% of application revenue and that Ethena pushed the top-three share to nearly 80%, forecasting more acquisitions, bankruptcies and shutdowns as capital concentrates. Valente’s post did not disclose the dataset, category definitions or measurement period for those figures. Bottom line ARK’s $40.2M tranche shows Cathie Wood doubling down on core thematic bets during volatility — a bullish signal for long-term believers in autonomous tech, space and AI hardware — while also maintaining selective crypto exposure. At the same time, the firm’s own research flags a tougher environment ahead for parts of the crypto ecosystem. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news