Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.71T
Market Cap
$2.71T
24h Trading Volume
$88.96B
BTC Dominance
58.30%
No coins found matching ""
Browse all cryptocurrenciesLatest Crypto News
View All News
Crypto Slips as Spot-Bitcoin ETF Demand Cools Despite S&P's 9-Week Rally
Headline: Crypto trails a nine-week stock rally as spot-Bitcoin ETF demand cools Despite a strong risk-on backdrop — the S&P 500 notched its ninth straight weekly gain (its longest run since 2023) and Brent crude held near $92 on hopes of a U.S.-Iran ceasefire extension — major cryptocurrencies finished the week lower as investor appetite for spot-Bitcoin ETFs softened. Market context - The S&P 500’s winning streak has pushed the index nearly 20% above its March lows, a run seen only a few times in the past four decades. Treasuries also climbed on the week, trimming some of their earlier war-driven losses. - The market optimism stems from reports the U.S. and Iran are close to agreeing a 60-day ceasefire extension. President Donald Trump said he was ready to make a “final determination” on a preliminary deal but reiterated strict conditions — including Iran abandoning its enriched uranium and opening the Strait of Hormuz — that Tehran has not publicly accepted. That makes the macro rally vulnerable to reversal on any negative headline. Crypto performance - Bitcoin slipped about 2.6% over the week to roughly $73.5k, and ether fell about 2.5% to $2,011, according to CoinDesk data — both down nearly 3% on the week. - Other large-cap moves: solana (SOL) eased 2.2% to $82.42, TRON’s TRX dropped 5.6% (its worst weekly decline among the top 10 tokens), while dogecoin (DOGE) finished roughly flat at $0.1009. - Cooling inflows into spot-Bitcoin ETFs were highlighted this week as a contributing factor to crypto’s pullback, offsetting the otherwise supportive macro picture. Notable winners - On the smaller-cap side, Hyperliquid’s HYPE token surged 19.4% to $65 after Intercontinental Exchange CEO Jeffrey Sprecher praised the decentralized perpetuals venue at a Bernstein conference, calling it “bigger than NASDAQ.” - Binance Coin (BNB) rose 1.9% and XRP eked out a 0.7% weekly gain. Bottom line Macro forces delivered a clear tailwind for traditional markets, but crypto failed to ride the same wave as ETF demand cooled. With the U.S.-Iran deal still pending Trump’s signature and his stated demands appearing beyond what Iran has signaled publicly, the broader rally — and crypto’s fragile bounce — could be undone by a single adverse headline. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Quantum Threat to Bitcoin: Harvest-Now/Decrypt-Later Puts In-Transit Signatures at Risk
Quantum danger to Bitcoin may be hiding in plain sight — and it isn’t just private keys. Andrew Gault, a decade-long backer of deep-tech and quantum hardware startups and CEO of networking firm ZeroTier, argues the crypto industry is focused on the wrong half of the quantum threat. In a recent CoinDesk interview, Gault — also a founding partner at London- and San Francisco-based 7percent Ventures, whose portfolio includes British quantum startup Universal Quantum — warned that the bigger vulnerability is not cold-wallet keys sitting idle, but the encrypted messages already streaming between exchanges, bridges, custodians and banks. “The financial system's most dangerous vulnerability isn't stored data, it's the data moving between institutions right now,” Gault said. He emphasized that every interbank message, payment authentication record and digital signature traversing networks today is being harvested by sophisticated actors who may not need to decrypt it now — only store it until quantum machines can break the encryption. The fear of quantum cracking private keys flared after Google Quantum AI researchers published results showing a sufficiently powerful quantum computer could derive a Bitcoin private key from an exposed public key in roughly nine minutes. That paper focused attention on about 6.9 million BTC currently sitting in addresses with exposed public keys and reignited concerns about Bitcoin’s lack of a coordinated post-quantum migration plan. But Gault says the more immediate problem is “harvest now, decrypt later” — the practice of capturing encrypted traffic today for decryption once quantum hardware catches up. Tech giants are already shifting priorities in that direction. In March, Google set 2029 as its target for completing a move to post-quantum cryptography, citing advances in quantum hardware, error correction and resource estimates. In a blog post, Google security leads Heather Adkins and Sophie Schmieg said the company has reprioritized its threat model toward authentication services and digital signatures — the same wire-level signing infrastructure Gault flags. “The threat to encryption is relevant today with store-now-decrypt-later attacks,” they wrote. The economic stakes are enormous. Citi modeled a quantum-enabled compromise of a single top-five U.S. bank’s access to the Fedwire Funds Service and estimated a cascading impact of $2 trillion to $3.3 trillion across the U.S. economy — a shock equal to a 10%–17% drop in real GDP. The Global Risk Institute, cited in Citi’s analysis, puts the probability of a cryptographically relevant quantum computer arriving by 2034 at roughly 19%–34%. For crypto, the attack surface is broader than just wallet keys. Cross-chain bridge proofs, exchange API authentications, signed transactions sitting in mempools, and the private signing traffic between cold storage and trading desks all live on the same vulnerability spectrum as bank-grade communications. CoinShares argued in February that the wallet-key fear may be overstated, estimating only about 10,200 BTC are concentrated enough to move markets if stolen. Gault’s concern is more structural: authentication records and signature proofs define who owns assets, who authorized transactions, and who bears legal liability — data that could be weaponized long after it’s collected. Some parts of the ecosystem are moving. Ethereum has launched a coordinated post-quantum migration effort. Bitcoin, however, has no comparable plan, and major exchanges and custodians — where much of the signing traffic is generated — have not publicly committed to a unified migration strategy. Until institutions treat moving-data encryption with the same urgency as stored keys, the industry could be building tomorrow’s vulnerabilities with today’s protocols. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Dimon vs. Armstrong: Banks Take On Coinbase in High-Stakes Stablecoin Yield Fight
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong answered JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon on Friday — not with a policy paper, but with a hockey-themed rivalry meme on X — escalating a months-long public standoff between crypto’s biggest exchange and Wall Street’s largest bank. The spat reignited after Dimon, appearing on Fox Business’s Mornings with Maria on May 29, blasted Armstrong and the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. Dimon warned the bill would let crypto firms “effectively pay interest on deposits, stablecoins or something like that, without the protection that they should have,” saying the proposal “would eventually blow up.” He also accused Armstrong of spending heavily in Washington to push the legislation and said, bluntly, “No one is going to bow down to this guy.” Earlier in January at Davos, Dimon reportedly told Armstrong directly, “you are full of sh!t,” in a private meeting that included former UK prime minister Tony Blair. Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan also told Armstrong there, “If you want to be a bank, just be a bank.” Reaction from the crypto world was swift. Galaxy Digital’s Mike Novogratz pushed back on X, asking, “Since when do banks get to decide on legislation?” — arguing lawmakers, not incumbents, should set the rules for digital assets. What’s at stake - The core disagreement is whether crypto platforms should be allowed to pay yield on stablecoin balances without becoming subject to bank-style regulation. - Coinbase has direct financial exposure: the firm reported $1.35 billion in stablecoin revenue in 2025, so the yield rules are both a policy and revenue issue. - Coinbase initially pulled support for the Clarity Act in January after a Senate draft would’ve effectively banned yield on stablecoin balances; that withdrawal forced Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott to cancel a planned vote. - By May, negotiators landed on a compromise that permits activity-based rewards while banning passive yield. Armstrong backed the updated bill ahead of the Senate Banking Committee’s May 14 markup, which advanced the legislation 15–9. Politics and probabilities Despite the committee vote, Dimon’s public denunciation signals major banks and their allies intend to fight the bill on the Senate floor. Analysts and markets are still pricing in meaningful chances of passage: Galaxy Research’s Alex Thorn puts the Clarity Act at 70% odds of passing before the August recess, while Polymarket traders give it about a 61% probability. Dimon’s intervention layers heavyweight institutional resistance onto an already compressed legislative timeline — increasing the uncertainty around how and whether the compromise will survive final votes. Bottom line: the clash between Jamie Dimon and Brian Armstrong has moved from Davos and committee-rooms to public airwaves and social feeds, underscoring how much is on the line for both traditional banks and crypto platforms as lawmakers decide how to regulate stablecoin yields. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Binance's 65th HODLer Airdrop Seeds Potential Listing with 10M GENIUS to BNB Stakers
Headline: Binance names Genius Terminal as 65th “HODLer Airdrop,” distributes 10M GENIUS to qualifying BNB holders Binance has added Genius Terminal to its HODLer Airdrop program, awarding 10 million GENIUS tokens to eligible BNB holders as the exchange continues its practice of seeding upcoming listings through targeted token drops. Key details - Project: Genius Terminal (GENIUS) — a multichain trading platform that plugs into perpetual decentralized exchanges and offers spot and perpetual trading with zero fees on select pairs. - Airdrop: 10,000,000 GENIUS tokens (1% of GENIUS’s 1 billion max supply). - Eligibility snapshot: May 11–13, 2026. Only BNB that was subscribed to Binance’s Simple Earn or On‑Chain Yields during that three-day window qualified. - Distribution: Allocations were proportional to each user’s BNB balance and were deposited to eligible users’ Spot Accounts within about five hours of Binance’s announcement. Binance posted that the airdrop page would go live on its Airdrop Portal within roughly five hours. Project background and market reaction Genius Terminal launched its token generation event in April 2026. The project received an eight‑figure strategic investment from YZi Labs (formerly Binance Labs) in January 2026, and Binance founder CZ joined as a strategic advisor. Following that backing, Genius Terminal saw a dramatic surge in platform trading volume — from roughly $80 million per week to more than $2 billion in the seven days after the announcement. Why Binance runs HODLer Airdrops Binance’s HODLer Airdrop program serves multiple aims: it rewards long‑term BNB stakers, boosts early visibility for projects building on BNB Smart Chain, and often seeds initial liquidity and community interest before listings. Historically, being featured as a HODLer Airdrop can produce sharp price swings when recipients decide whether to hold or sell — for example, SAPIEN jumped more than 100% in the 24 hours after it was listed as the 57th HODLer Airdrop. Trends and next steps Genius Terminal’s inclusion follows the 64th HODLer Airdrop, which spotlighted Gensyn, a decentralized AI compute network — a sign that Binance’s recent curation has favored AI‑linked infrastructure projects. Binance has not formally confirmed whether GENIUS will receive a full spot listing following the airdrop, though previous HODLer projects have commonly moved to spot trading within 24 hours of the airdrop announcement. Bottom line The GENIUS HODLer Airdrop reinforces Binance’s strategy of using targeted token distributions to incentivize BNB staking and to elevate vetted projects ahead of exchange listings. With 1% of GENIUS’s supply injected into holders’ accounts and recent investor backing and advisor ties, the token will be one to watch for volatility and potential listing activity. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Corporates Scoop Up Ether as Bankless Co-Founder Exits — On-Chain Activity Holds Firm
Headline: Big Buyers and a Cautious Exit — Ethereum Sees Contrasting Bets as On‑Chain Activity Holds Firm David Hoffman, co-founder of newsletter Bankless, quietly exited his last Ethereum position this week, declaring that “the investment case for ETH had largely played out.” His sell-off marked a notable contrast to a wave of corporate accumulation that pushed some public firms deeper into Ether exposure. Nasdaq-listed miner and crypto investor Bit Digital led the buying charge: on May 11 the company spent about $20 million to add 8,568 ETH at an average price of $2,334 per token, lifting its treasury to roughly 158,462 ETH. CEO Sam Tabar said the purchase lowered the firm’s average acquisition cost and fits into Bit Digital’s broader plan to grow net asset value per share by combining Ethereum treasury management, AI and high-performance computing infrastructure, and strategic acquisitions. Bit Digital’s WhiteFiber subsidiary also trades publicly under the ticker WYFI. That bolt-on buy also reshuffled the public rankings. According to CoinGecko data, Bit Digital moved ahead of Coinbase Global — which held about 151,175 ETH — to become the fourth-largest public corporate holder of Ether. Other big buyers have been even more aggressive. Bitmine Immersion Technologies completed its largest ETH purchase of the year earlier this week, adding 111,942 ETH. Chairman Tom Lee framed the move as a bet on an upcoming “crypto supercycle” driven by tokenization and AI-powered agents. CoinGecko currently lists Bitmine Immersion as the largest public Ethereum treasury holder, with more than 5 million ETH. All of this accumulation is happening while Ether trades well below recent peaks. ETH was around $2,013 at the time of reporting — roughly 30% down year-to-date and nearly 60% below its August 2025 high near $4,946. Standard Chartered sees a disconnect between price and network health. In a report published Thursday the bank noted that transaction activity and total value locked on Ethereum remain close to record levels despite the token’s sharp slide. Geoff Kendrick, the bank’s global head of digital assets research, maintained a price target of $4,000 for ETH by the end of 2026 and an ambitious $40,000 by 2030, arguing that growth in stablecoin usage and tokenization could help close the gap between network utility and token valuation. Hoffman’s departure reflects a different concern: while he expects Ethereum’s ecosystem to continue expanding via stablecoins, tokenization, and Layer 2s, he worries that only a limited portion of that growth may flow through to ETH holders directly. Why it matters - The market is seeing divergent strategies: some investors are trimming exposure while corporates and miners are doubling down on ETH as a treasury asset and strategic play for AI/HPC integration. - On-chain metrics suggest robust network usage, but token price is detached — creating both an opportunity for long-term accumulation and a challenge for valuation models. - Analyst targets remain bullish over multi-year horizons, but near-term dynamics could stay volatile given the disconnect between usage and price. Image: Trail Runner Magazine. Chart: TradingView. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Glassnode: 580K BTC Return to Loss as 'Supply in Loss' Hits 8.33M After Pullback
Glassnode: Bitcoin “supply in loss” jumps to 8.33M BTC after recent pullback On-chain analytics firm Glassnode this week highlighted a sharp rise in Bitcoin’s Total Supply in Loss — the amount of BTC currently held at a net unrealized loss — which has climbed to 8.33 million coins after the market pullback in late May. How the metric works - Total Supply in Loss scans each coin’s transaction history to identify the price at which it last moved on-chain. If that last transfer price is higher than the current spot price, the coin is counted as being “in loss.” - The flip side of this is the Total Supply in Profit, which tallies coins with a cost basis below today’s price. What the chart shows - Glassnode’s 7-hour simple moving average of this metric shows the supply-in-loss falling through April and into early May as Bitcoin rallied. At the market peak, underwater supply had dropped below 7 million BTC. - By contrast, the metric approached ~10 million BTC after the February crash. The recent move - Bitcoin’s retrace from $76,600 to roughly $73,000 pushed roughly 580,000 BTC back into loss territory — a clear sign that a meaningful quantity of coins changed hands in the $73,000–$76,600 band. - Glassnode warns this cohort “adds to near-term sell pressure as holders reassess their positions into the correction.” Where things stand - The network’s overall state remains healthier than it was after the February crash, but the fresh rise in underwater supply underscores renewed short-term pressure and uncertainty. - At the time of writing, Bitcoin trades around $73,200, down more than 5% over the past week. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news