Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.71T
Market Cap
$2.71T
24h Trading Volume
$88.96B
BTC Dominance
58.30%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Wintermute Joins Prediction Markets, Injects Pro Liquidity to Tighten Spreads
Wintermute jumps into prediction markets, bringing pro market-making muscle to a fast-growing corner of crypto Wintermute, one of crypto’s largest liquidity providers, has begun quoting buy and sell prices across active event contracts on major prediction market platforms, stepping into a sector that has rapidly become a major venue for trading real‑world event risk. Why Wintermute matters - The firm says it will focus on markets that have strong user demand but suffer from shallow execution depth, with the aim of tightening bid-ask spreads and deepening order books so larger trades can be executed more smoothly. - Wintermute argues prediction markets now require the same institutional-grade infrastructure used across digital asset trading — execution systems, custody, collateral management and risk controls — and that its existing stack maps directly to those needs. - The company points to its track record: more than $5 trillion in cumulative trading volume across 50+ digital-asset venues, experience it says enables two‑sided markets with tighter pricing and deeper liquidity. Market context and scale - Industry figures cited by Wintermute show prediction markets eclipsed $60 billion in trading volume in 2026, with monthly activity running roughly $20–$25 billion. - Polymarket’s U.S. 2024 presidential-election contracts demonstrated the demand: that market processed more than $3 billion in volume tied to the election. - Kalshi — now the dominant U.S. venue — saw annualized trading volume jump from $52 billion to $178 billion over six months through early 2026, and accounts for more than 90% of U.S. prediction-market activity, per the same figures. - Investor interest has also moved beyond curiosity: Kalshi raised $1 billion in a Series F at a $22 billion valuation. Why liquidity providers are flocking in - Wintermute’s head of OTC trading Jake Ostrovskis said prediction markets exhibit the demand characteristics of larger asset classes, but their liquidity infrastructure is less mature. He added that sustained, two‑sided liquidity typically reduces spreads, supports bigger trades and improves the informational value of prices. - The opportunity has been visible in the form of pricing gaps and arbitrage: one report estimated about $40 million in arbitrage was taken from Polymarket between April 2024 and April 2025 — a sign professionals view these inefficiencies as tradable. Implications for users and platforms - For traders on Kalshi, Polymarket and similar platforms, the arrival of professional market makers like Wintermute could mean narrower spreads, better depth and easier execution of large positions — addressing a long-standing problem of thin order books in contracts tied to events such as central-bank decisions. Regulatory and fiscal pressure - Regulators are paying closer attention as the sector grows. The CFTC issued an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on March 16, 2026, focused on manipulation risks and oversight of event contracts. - State lawmakers are active as well: at least 11 states have advanced legislative measures targeting prediction markets. - Tax policy is another pressure point — one estimate cited in the announcement placed potential forgone tax revenue from unregulated prediction markets at about $600 million. Bottom line Professional market makers entering prediction markets signals the sector is maturing from hobbyist liquidity into something closer to mainstream financial trading. That should improve user execution and price quality — even as regulatory and tax scrutiny increases. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Why Stablecoins Will Power AI Commerce — Programmable Control Layers, Not Wallets, Capture Value
Payouts.com co-founders Leor Ceder and Barak Hirchson argue the next wave of AI-driven commerce will run on stablecoin rails — but the real enterprise value will live in the programmable control layer that governs them, not in wallets alone. Why stablecoins? Juniper Research estimates cross-border B2B stablecoin payments could explode from $13.4 billion in 2026 to $5 trillion by 2035, with B2B taking 85% of total stablecoin transaction value. Hirchson, Payouts.com’s chief solutions officer, says rail choice ultimately depends on recipient country, payment method, urgency, size and cost — and in many cases stablecoins are the clear winner. He points to two sweet spots: - Cross-border vs. SWIFT: traditional wires can lose 4–5% to fees and FX spreads, making stablecoins far cheaper. - Machine-to-API micropayments: the x402 standard already routes pay-per-call API invoices in stablecoin. Crypto.news reported AI agents have settled $73 million across 176 million transactions on crypto rails, with USDC handling 98.6% of that activity. But wallets are only the foundation. “PIX clears in under ten seconds in Brazil for free, UPI handles hundreds of millions of transactions a day in India at near-zero cost,” Hirchson noted. “The agents that scale are the ones that can pick the right rail per transaction, not the ones locked into a single rail based on what their limited wallet supports.” More important, he says, is the programmable control layer that enforces enterprise policies. Hirchson lists five non-negotiable controls companies should require before allowing agents to transact autonomously: - Scoped credentials tied to specific capabilities - Hard spend caps enforced at the protocol level - Cryptographically signed mandates - Idempotency at the payment layer to prevent duplicate charges - A fail-closed posture so systems stop rather than risk unauthorized spending “This is what programmable spending actually means,” he said. “You define the envelope once, the infrastructure enforces it forever, and the agent operates freely inside it.” He warns some wallets still ship with only an API key and a balance — “the worst-case configuration for a compromised key” — while others already include hard caps and signed mandates. Ceder frames the debate not as a race for which stablecoin wins, but over programmability. By mid‑2027, he predicts, the critical differentiator will be how granularly enterprises can specify agent permissions, how reliably policies are enforced, and how cleanly compliance can be proven afterward. “The wallet wars happening right now will look the way the browser wars look in retrospect: necessary, formative, and not where the durable value got captured,” he said. He argued that the compliance layer must be embedded in the infrastructure so every payment runs through principal, account and jurisdiction checks before money moves. Industry momentum is aligning around new rails and standards. Coinbase and Cloudflare have incorporated the x402 protocol into a fast-growing settlement rail for agents; x402 recently joined the Linux Foundation. AWS embedded x402 into Amazon Bedrock AgentCore Payments this month, and Solana and Google launched Pay.sh as a parallel route. Payouts.com’s bet is clear: agents should remain autonomous, but enterprise spend will be captured by the control layer sitting above stablecoin rails. The envelope around the agent — not the agent itself — is where durable value will land. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Daly: Fed Won't Harm Jobs to Cut Inflation — Extended Tight Rates Threaten Crypto
Mary Daly, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, reiterated that restoring price stability is essential—but not at the expense of the broader economy. In remarks summarized by Chaincatcher, Daly stressed that the Fed can’t pursue lower inflation by “harming the economy,” framing policy as a careful balancing act between returning inflation to the 2% target and protecting the labor market. That cautious tone is consistent with Daly’s recent messaging. She’s described policy as “in a good place,” argued the Fed can “afford patience,” and urged a “measured, data‑dependent approach.” Daly has warned that while progress on inflation matters, “progress is not victory,” and uncertainty around both price pressures and employment means policymakers should plan for multiple scenarios rather than a single forecast path. Daly has repeatedly highlighted the Fed’s dual mandate: to restore price stability while supporting maximum employment. She’s cautioned against keeping rates “too high for too long,” saying that if restrictive policy triggers mass layoffs, “you’ve given people low inflation, but you’ve taken their jobs,” which would defeat the dual mandate’s purpose. Markets have read Daly’s comments as signaling that the Federal Open Market Committee is likelier to keep the policy rate in the current 5.25%–5.50% range for an extended period, delaying cuts until there is clearer evidence that inflation is steadily moving toward 2%. Her stance dovetails with recent private-sector projections. Goldman Sachs, for example, has pushed back its forecast for the first Fed rate cut to September 2026 and now expects inflation to run near 2.9%—a view that implies a more restrictive policy environment for longer and tougher conditions for risk assets. Daly didn’t give specific forecasts for growth, unemployment, or the timing of rate changes in the Jin10 summary, but her overall message was clear: the Fed will favor incremental, data-driven decisions over pre-committing to a rapid easing cycle. What this means for crypto: prolonged higher rates typically reduce liquidity and risk appetite, putting pressure on risk assets including crypto. Daly’s insistence on balancing price stability with employment protection signals the Fed is walking a narrow path—one that could keep monetary conditions relatively tight and markets volatile until inflation and labor data present a clearer picture. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Dimon Warns Clarity Act Could 'Blow Up' If Banks' Stablecoin Concerns Aren't Addressed
JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon ratcheted up the pressure Friday in the escalating fight over stablecoin rules, warning that the latest draft of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act risks collapsing unless lawmakers take banks’ concerns seriously. In a blunt Fox Business interview with Maria Bartiromo, Dimon criticized Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong and said the current bill would effectively let crypto firms “pay interest on deposits, stablecoins or something like that, without protection that they should have.” “The banks will not accept it that way,” Dimon said. “I’m not worried about stablecoins but if it happened I’m telling you I will have nothing to do with it and it will eventually blow up.” What’s at stake - The Clarity Act — a bipartisan effort to define how federal securities and commodities regulators oversee crypto — is being negotiated in parallel versions: the Senate Banking Committee recently advanced its draft, and the Senate Agriculture Committee moved its own earlier this year. Representatives from both committees are now merging the bills ahead of any full-Senate consideration. - Key flashpoints include reserve requirements for stablecoin issuers, consumer protections, and whether crypto firms should be allowed to offer yield-bearing products that look and act like traditional bank deposit accounts (often called stablecoin rewards). - For the bill to become law it still must pass both the House and Senate and be signed by President Donald Trump. Why stablecoin “rewards” are controversial Coinbase and other crypto platforms have pushed for the ability to offer high-yield programs tied to stablecoins, arguing these are competitive digital financial products. Banking executives counter that products mimicking bank deposits should face the same regulatory and oversight standards as banks. That clash over “stablecoin rewards” has emerged as one of the reasons the legislation has struggled to gain momentum despite broad bipartisan interest in a regulatory framework for digital assets. A now-personalized dispute The policy fight has spilled into personal tensions between crypto leaders and Wall Street. According to The Wall Street Journal, a heated exchange in Davos earlier this year saw Dimon tell Armstrong, “You are full of s---,” while other bank chiefs reportedly rebuffed Armstrong — with Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan suggesting, “If you want to be a bank, just be a bank.” Citi’s Jane Fraser and Wells Fargo’s Charlie Scharf reportedly kept their interactions brief or declined to engage. Where things go from here Negotiators from the two Senate committees must reconcile competing language before the full Senate can consider the measure. Expect intense lobbying from both banks and crypto firms as lawmakers try to craft language that balances innovation and consumer protection without upending the traditional banking model. Dimon’s warning signals that banks may walk away if the final text allows unregulated bank-like yield products — a split that could doom the legislation if not bridged. Coinbase and JPMorgan did not respond to requests for comment by publication time. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
PI stuck near $0.14 as CiDi beta hits 81K — ecosystem gains clash with thin liquidity
Pi Network’s PI token is stuck in a tight range around $0.14 as the project’s ecosystem shows signs of life — notably CiDi Games’ beta drawing more than 81,000 users — even as thin liquidity and fragmented IOU listings keep price action choppy. Quick snapshot (as of May 29, 2026) - Bybit IOU: PI trading near $0.144, 24-hour low ~$0.1418 and high ~$0.1461 — roughly a 3% intraday swing. Trading volumes across major IOU venues remain in the low single-digit millions of dollars. - OKX instrument: a separate PI tracker shows a price quoted in fractions of a cent, a 24-hour gain of over 40% and a market capitalization near $84,000 — a stark reminder that pricing and liquidity are inconsistent across platforms. What’s driving the noise - Event-driven interest: PI briefly outperformed larger altcoins after a late-April pop — rising more than 5% on April 29 and about 11% for the week as investors positioned ahead of Pi’s high-profile presence at Consensus 2026 in Miami. That rally looked driven more by speculation around the event than broad capital rotation into the token. - Real-world traction: CiDi Games’ beta has already attracted 81,000+ users, a development supporters point to as the kind of product-driven adoption that could underpin long-term value in the Pi ecosystem. Project proponents argue the path to sustainable upside lies in converting the network’s large KYC-verified user base into on-chain demand. The structural obstacles - Fragmented markets: IOU listings, different tracking instruments and inconsistent circulating-supply data leave price discovery impaired. The OKX quote versus Bybit IOU example underscores how quoted prices can diverge dramatically. - Legacy damage: PI’s longer-term chart is bruised — the token plunged more than 90% in 2025 from an all-time high near $3 to roughly $0.20 by December 18, 2025. Post-mainnet selling and exchange migration flows weighed heavily on investor confidence. - Token unlock and liquidity concerns: Delays in delivering fully unlocked, freely transferable mainnet tokens, plus opaque supply metrics, remain sticking points for skeptical traders. Technical context - Earlier technical work flagged oversold conditions in mid‑2025 and identified support and pivot levels around $0.69–$0.70 and $0.74 as critical for any sustained recovery, with further resistance clusters near $0.85–$0.99. Subsequent analysis pointed to dynamic resistance around $0.65 and $0.80 as key hurdles. Those levels now sit well above current IOU quotes in the mid‑teens of a dollar, illustrating how deep the drawdown has been. Outlook With PI trading more than 90% below its peak and daily action compressed around $0.14, the near-term outlook hinges on two things: whether ecosystem projects like CiDi Games can turn user engagement into real on-chain activity, and whether improved liquidity/transparent listings surface in spot markets. Until on-chain demand and consistent pricing show up, volatility is likely to remain elevated and price discovery fragmented. Read more about developments in the Pi ecosystem as CiDi’s beta adoption, token unlock progress and exchange listings evolve. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Spot BTC, ETH ETFs Suffer Multi-Day Nine-Figure Outflows as Macro Headwinds Bite
Headline: Spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs see sustained redemptions as macro headwinds bite Spot Bitcoin ETFs extended a multi-day redemption run on May 28, with investors pulling $229 million from the products, according to SoSoValue. Spot Ethereum ETFs also remained under pressure, recording $121.4 million in net outflows and marking a 13-day streak of withdrawals. What happened - Bitcoin funds: The May 28 outflow reduced cumulative net inflows for spot Bitcoin ETFs to $55.79 billion, with total net assets at $94.25 billion and daily trading volume across the complex of $2.36 billion. The nine-day outflow streak has removed roughly $2.84 billion from Bitcoin ETFs. Major single-day redemptions in the run included $733.4 million on May 27, $333.7 million on May 26 and $648.6 million on May 18. The last positive session before the current sequence was May 14, when Bitcoin ETFs logged $131.3 million in inflows. Total net assets have dropped from $107.75 billion on May 14 to $94.25 billion on May 28 — a change driven by both redemptions and underlying Bitcoin price moves. - Ethereum funds: Spot Ethereum ETFs saw $121.4 million leave on May 28, bringing cumulative net inflows to $11.39 billion and total net assets to $11.30 billion. Daily trading volume was $691.3 million. The 13-day outflow streak has pulled about $694.6 million from these products since May 11. The largest single-day loss in the sequence was $130.6 million on May 12, followed by the $121.4 million withdrawal on May 28. Relative impact - Because Bitcoin ETFs sit on a much larger asset base, the same-dollar outflows are less disruptive in percentage terms. The May 28 Ethereum outflow represented about 1.07% of ETH ETFs’ total net assets, compared with roughly 0.24% for Bitcoin ETFs. Why flows are turning - The outflows come amid an environment less favorable to non-yielding risk assets: rising long-term Treasury yields have dented expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, nudging investors toward safer, income-producing instruments. At the same time, Bitcoin-specific buying by major corporate participants appeared to cool, with “Strategy” pausing fresh purchases after its preferred stock traded below par. Market snapshot - At press time, BTC traded at $73,661. Bottom line: Spot BTC and ETH ETFs — once a major liquidity channel for crypto — are seeing sustained redemptions over multiple trading days, with Ethereum’s smaller asset base making daily nine-figure outflows proportionally more significant. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news