Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.31T
Market Cap
$2.31T
24h Trading Volume
$70.34B
BTC Dominance
56.22%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Kalshi Denied Emergency Stay — NY Can Enforce Gambling Laws, Clouding Crypto Prediction Markets
Kalshi fails to win emergency relief from NY enforcement while its appeal proceeds A federal judge in Manhattan declined on July 27 to block New York from enforcing its gambling laws against KalshiEX while the exchange’s appeal works its way through the courts. What happened - U.S. District Judge Analisa Torres (SDNY) denied KalshiEX’s request for an emergency injunction pending appeal in KalshiEX LLC v. Williams. The three-page order also rejected Kalshi’s alternate request for short-term administrative relief. - The order does not dismiss Kalshi’s appeal (filed with the Second Circuit as No. 26-1835) or resolve the underlying case; it only refuses to shield Kalshi from New York enforcement during the appellate process. - Kalshi had appealed after Torres on July 7 denied its motion for a preliminary injunction. That earlier ruling concluded the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) likely does not preempt New York’s gambling laws as applied to Kalshi’s sports-event contracts. Why the court refused emergency relief - An injunction pending appeal requires a stronger showing of likely success than a standard preliminary injunction. Torres said Kalshi failed to satisfy any of the four required factors in the earlier proceeding and did not identify extraordinary circumstances that would justify reversing that decision. - Kalshi argued it faced a Hobson’s choice: violate New York law or comply and risk losing federal registration. Torres found the claimed risk speculative and viewed the expected costs as monetary—insufficient to establish irreparable harm. The CFTC rule proposal and the court’s view - Kalshi pointed to a June proposed rule from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) asserting that the CEA expressly preempts state laws regulating transactions on CFTC-registered exchanges and proposing standards for reviewing event contracts involving gaming, unlawful conduct, war, terrorism and assassination. - Torres did not invalidate or formally reject that proposed rule. Citing the Supreme Court’s Loper Bright decision, she emphasized that courts must independently interpret statutes and reiterated her view that the CEA does not automatically displace all state gambling laws covering swap-like transactions. The CFTC proposal completed its public-comment period on July 27 but is not a final rule. Broader legal landscape and why this matters to crypto/prediction markets - The issue of federal preemption is split across courts. In April the Third Circuit (2–1) held New Jersey could not regulate Kalshi’s sports-event contracts because they fell within the CFTC’s exclusive jurisdiction. Other courts, including Torres in SDNY, have taken a narrower view, allowing states to apply gambling laws in many cases. - The split broadened July 27 when a Minnesota federal judge temporarily blocked that state’s ban on direct prediction markets, finding several Kalshi and Polymarket contracts likely met the federal definition of swaps (though the judge warned later relief might be narrower). - Kalshi has faced additional state-level restrictions (e.g., Washington), and the CFTC has sued multiple states, arguing that federally registered exchanges should operate under a single national derivatives framework. Those fights have direct implications for crypto-native prediction markets and any platforms offering event-based contracts, which could face a patchwork of state enforcement unless federal preemption is clarified. What’s next - The Second Circuit will consider Kalshi’s emergency motion; its decision could temporarily halt New York enforcement while the appeal is resolved. After ruling on the emergency relief, the appeals court will address the merits, including whether New York’s gambling laws are preempted by the CEA. - Separately, the CFTC may revise or finalize its proposed prediction-market rule after reviewing public comments; no deadline for a final rule has been announced. Bottom line: For now, New York regulators remain free to enforce state gambling laws against Kalshi unless an appellate court intervenes. The coming rulings and any CFTC rulemaking will be closely watched by crypto and prediction-market platforms operating across state lines. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
1inch Opens Aqua to All: Self‑Custodial, Risk‑Controlled Liquidity on 13 EVM Chains
1inch has opened Aqua — its shared DeFi liquidity layer — to all users, eight months after the protocol first launched in developer-only mode. The public rollout, announced Tuesday, spans 13 EVM chains including Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, BNB Chain and Robinhood Chain. A user-facing front end had originally been planned for the first quarter. What Aqua is and how it works - Aqua is positioned as “the foundation for scalable, capital-efficient DeFi.” Unlike a traditional liquidity pool, Aqua functions as a registry: liquidity providers (LPs) approve a token balance and create positions that can draw on that approval. Tokens remain in the provider’s wallet — they are not deposited into a protocol contract. - When a swap matches a position’s terms, Aqua atomically pulls the required tokens from the provider’s wallet and returns proceeds plus fees. Approvals are set per token and per chain and can be revoked at any time, preserving self-custody. - 1inch emphasizes that this model caps counterparty exposure by actual holdings rather than by the sum of positions: for example, a single $100,000 wallet balance could support positions that collectively quote $300,000, but swaps can only execute against tokens actually present in the wallet. Risk-controlled execution and “verified counterparties” - Every swap on Aqua must be executed by a “verified counterparty” — defined by 1inch as a market maker or arbitrage bot whose verification is enforced on-chain at swap time. 1inch bills Aqua as the industry’s first “risk-controlled liquidity venue,” framing it as a step toward more risk-aware and regulated DeFi. - The protocol’s single-owner position model is designed to deter tactics like just-in-time fee skimming; 1inch says the economics of such attacks become unattractive, potentially costing attackers as much as 44% of provider fee income. Safety checks, incentives and caveats - Aqua has undergone eight independent audits from firms including OpenZeppelin, Nethermind, Hexens and Bailsec. - To kickstart activity, the 1inch Foundation committed 10 million 1INCH in provider rewards, and the 1inch DAO added 500,000 USDC, to be distributed via Merkl. - 1inch warns Aqua is aimed at experienced users: fees are not guaranteed, prices can move against positions, and providers remain exposed to market and smart contract risks. Why it matters 1inch says Aqua could change how capital and yield strategies operate in DeFi by increasing usable liquidity without forcing LPs to relinquish custody. If adoption grows among market makers and bots, Aqua may reduce fragmentation and route more activity through a risk-controlled layer — potentially shifting the infrastructure dynamics of the decentralized markets it plugs into. 1inch’s launch-day messaging summed it up bluntly: “Liquidity providers: it’s time to wake up. Use 1inch Aqua to find more activity in more markets, without letting your tokens out of your wallet.” Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Fortitude unveils 12MW Nebraska Zcash data center, cutting mining costs to about $40/coin
Fortitude, the Digital Currency Group (DCG)-owned miner, has flipped the switch on its first greenfield data center — a 12-megawatt Zcash mining site in Grand Island, Nebraska — advancing a push to control its own power and cut mining costs as it prepares to go public. The newly completed facility, Fortitude’s first built from scratch rather than leased, has finished construction and electrical testing and is now ready for commercial operations. It boosts the company’s owned power portfolio to more than 60 megawatts spread across seven sites, and comes as Fortitude pursues a planned public listing via a previously announced business combination with HeartSciences (Nasdaq: HSCS). Why this matters - Cost punch: Fortitude projects the Grand Island site will lower its direct cash cost to mine Zcash from about $70 per coin to roughly $40 per coin, assuming successful deployment of new miners and stable power, network and market conditions. With Zcash trading around $489 per coin at the time of the announcement, that gap would materially widen potential operating margins. - Cheaper electricity: The site will buy power at about $0.045 per kWh and is sited between two solar generation facilities and adjacent to a substation with excess capacity. That location lets the operation act as an interruptible load — scaling back consumption during grid stress — and tap lower-cost, locally available generation. - Hardware and integration: Fortitude attributes much of the expected savings to next-generation, more efficient mining hardware combined with its owned-and-operated power strategy. CEO Andrea Childs framed the move as strategic vertical integration: “Owning the asset rather than leasing capacity from someone whose incentives run opposite to ours is intended to give us a degree of flexibility that we believe few operators have.” She also emphasized Fortitude’s focus on Zcash, saying the asset’s mining economics are less mature and less crowded than Bitcoin’s and that Fortitude’s vertically integrated model positions it to benefit from Zcash’s growth. A new entrant with legacy roots Launched in January 2025 out of DCG’s Foundry mining division, Fortitude follows a “venture mining” playbook: mine proof-of-work coins (including Bitcoin and Zcash), then reinvest profits into more equipment and new sites to expand its footprint. The Grand Island project is an early example of that strategy in action. Broader backdrop The announcement comes as miners nationwide scramble for low-cost power amid rising competition from AI data centers and greater scrutiny of data-center electricity and water consumption. Grand Island officials say Fortitude designed the facility to operate as a flexible grid resource and to limit community impact. Childs added: “Competition for power has intensified, but in our view, it hasn't slowed us down. By developing and owning our own sites, we seek to control our power costs directly rather than relying on third-party vendors to set them for us.” Bottom line: Fortitude’s new Nebraska facility is a concrete step in its push to pair owned, low-cost power with efficient hardware — lowering Zcash mining costs and strengthening the company’s argument as it moves toward a public listing. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Myanmar law: death penalty for coerced scam victims, life sentences for crypto fraudsters
Myanmar’s military-backed parliament has approved a tough new law that makes the death penalty available for people who use violence or unlawful detention to force others into running online scam operations — and imposes life sentences for those who run crypto-related fraud. Key points of the law - The draft published in May stipulated that “the death penalty shall be imposed” when coercion or unlawful detention used to force victims into scam operations results in the victim’s death. - The same draft set a maximum penalty of life imprisonment for anyone who operates an online scam center or commits “digital currency scams (crypto scams),” with coercion offenses carrying terms from 10 years to life. - A lower-house MP, Aye Chan, told AFP the death-penalty provision survived into the final approved text and that “the important parts of the bill remained the same.” The full text has not yet been released. Political and legal context - This is the first law passed by the government of Min Aung Hlaing, the general who led the 2021 coup and formally became civilian president in April. Under Myanmar’s constitution, a quarter of parliamentary seats — 166 — are reserved for the military; the USDP won 339 of the remaining seats in phased elections that Aung San Suu Kyi’s dissolved party could not contest. - Myanmar resumed judicial executions in 2022, hanging four activists — the first state executions since 1976. In April, days after taking office, Min Aung Hlaing commuted every existing death sentence in the country to life imprisonment. Three months later, parliament has legislated new capital punishments tied to scam-related violence. Regional crypto-crime backdrop - International authorities have increasingly linked Southeast Asian compounds and militias to transnational cyber-scam networks. In May 2025 the U.S. Treasury designated the Karen National Army (formerly the Karen Border Guard Force) as a transnational criminal organization, saying its territory on the Thai border “is home to multiple cyber scam syndicates” and that it “has benefitted from its connection to Burma’s military.” The KNA denies involvement. - The UN Office on Drugs and Crime estimates scam operations across East Asia, Southeast Asia and Oceania produced between $88.3 billion and $114.1 billion in losses in 2025, with people from at least 80 countries found inside scam compounds. The UNODC has warned that police in the region still struggle to trace scam proceeds on-chain. - Regional responses include Cambodia advancing its own bill that would impose life terms for compound bosses. U.S. prosecutors this month seized about $25 million in crypto tied to scams routed through the region. What it means for crypto and enforcement The new Myanmar law explicitly names “digital currency scams” among the offenses that can trigger life imprisonment, and it creates the harshest penalties where coercion leads to death. But the move highlights a broader enforcement problem: even as governments legislate tougher sentences and carry out asset seizures, tracing and recovering crypto-linked proceeds across borders remains technically and legally difficult — a challenge UN agencies and prosecutors continue to flag. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
One-Share Trade Triggers 17.9% Flash Drop in Hyperliquid SK Hynix Perp — Oracle Risk Exposed
Hyperliquid’s SK Hynix perpetual contract plunged as much as 17.9% on July 28 after an anomalous one-share trade in South Korea fed into the contract’s oracle pricing, highlighting how thin local markets can ripple through continuously running crypto derivatives. What happened - During NextTrade’s pre-market session in Seoul, a single SK Hynix share printed at KRW 1.272 million — roughly 29.96% below the prior close of KRW 1.816 million. That isolated print briefly pushed the stock to its daily lower limit. - The off-market print passed into the external price feed used by the Hyperliquid perpetual (listed on-chain as xyz:SKHX and shown in the UI as SKHYNIX-USDC), causing the contract mark price to fall from roughly $1,128.20 to about $927 before recovering above $1,100. - The contract allows up to 10x leverage. As the mark price moved lower, levered positions faced the risk of liquidations or automatic deleveraging. Who runs the market and why it mattered - Hyperliquid says the SKHX market was deployed and is operated by Trade.xyz under the protocol’s HIP-3 framework, which lets independent teams launch perpetual markets on Hyperliquid while using the network’s infrastructure (order books, margin system, liquidation engine). - Trade.xyz is investigating the incident and told ChainThink it will publish an update once the probe is complete. Hyperliquid’s documentation shows deployers select oracles and other price inputs and must stake 500,000 HYPE, with potential slashing for misconduct — making each deployer’s price methodology central to risk controls. Market impact and metrics - SK Hynix’s regular Seoul session later closed at KRW 1.55 million, down 14.65% — less severe than the one-share pre-market print that drove the perp’s flash move. - On-chain trackers and aggregators captured the event: HyperInsight recorded the mark-price drop noted above; DeFiLlama later logged SKHX near $1,067 (about -13.7% over 24 hours), open interest around $406 million after a ~20% decline, and daily volume above $1 billion. These figures remain fluid as positions adjust. - Importantly, there’s no verified evidence of any on-chain compromise or smart contract exploit. The available data points to an external market print being absorbed by Trade.xyz’s pricing pipeline. Open questions and next steps - Key unresolved items include which specific NXT inputs entered the oracle, whether configured filters or sanity checks functioned as intended, and whether any safeguard settings will be changed. - Hyperliquid allows deployers to halt trading, change open-interest limits, or settle a contract; as of the latest reports, the SKHX market remained active and no permanent suspension had been announced. Why this matters The incident underscores a recurring risk for crypto derivatives that reference thinly traded, time-zone-limited assets: a single outlier trade on a local exchange can move an oracle-fed perpetual markedly, triggering liquidations in a continuously operating market. Multiple DEXs have launched Korean-stock perps recently, increasing the exposure of crypto derivatives to such cross-market quirks. Trade.xyz’s forthcoming report will be the next authoritative update; it should clarify whether the contract behaved per published rules or whether oracle methodology and deployer safeguards need revision. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Paradigm Leads $470M into Antares Nuclear as Crypto Capital Backs SMRs to Power AI
Headline: Crypto-native Paradigm leads $470M round into Antares Nuclear as firm expands into AI and power infrastructure Paradigm — the high-profile venture firm best known for backing crypto projects — is leading a $470 million Series C for Antares Nuclear, signaling a push into military-focused small modular reactors (SMRs) as the firm broadens beyond blockchain into frontier infrastructure that supports AI and heavy computing. Deal specifics - Total raise: $470 million (reported as $370 million in equity + $100 million in debt). - Lead investor: Paradigm. - Co-lead: Caffeinated Capital. - Other participants: Industrious Ventures, Point72 Ventures, Shine Capital. This investment arrives shortly after Paradigm closed a $1.2 billion fourth fund on July 8, which the firm said will keep crypto “first” while expanding allocations into AI, robotics, aerospace, manufacturing and other emerging tech. Why it matters to crypto and AI communities Paradigm’s backing of Antares is a clear example of crypto capital flowing into physical infrastructure that underpins large-scale computing. As AI models scale and hyperscale data centers proliferate, demand for steady, high-density power is rising. Advanced nuclear — including compact SMRs — is increasingly viewed by investors as a dependable option to power data centers, government sites and industry where continuous baseload power is required. Antares and the Mark-0 milestone Antares develops compact reactors in the 100 kW to 1 MW range — roughly enough to power about 750 homes at the upper end. Its demonstration reactor, Mark-0, reached criticality on June 4 at Idaho National Laboratory, meaning it sustained a controlled nuclear chain reaction — a major technical milestone. Market focus and timeline Rather than selling first into commercial utility markets, Antares is targeting U.S. government customers. The company is one of three finalists in the Pentagon’s Advanced Nuclear Power for Installations program, which plans SMR evaluations at Air Force bases in Colorado and Montana. If timelines hold, Antares expects to bring its first electricity-producing reactor online next year, then begin deployments at military installations in 2028. Technology notes Antares uses TRISO fuel — uranium particles coated in multiple carbon and ceramic layers designed to contain radioactivity at high temperatures — a choice shared by several advanced-nuclear developers. TRISO can pair with non-water coolants such as helium gas or molten salts, diverging from conventional water-cooled reactor designs. Bigger VC trend and headwinds The Antares round comes amid a surge of investor interest in advanced nuclear: X-energy completed a $1 billion IPO in April, and startups like Radiant Energy, Standard Nuclear and Last Energy have each raised north of $100 million since last December. Much of this momentum is driven by AI-related power demand. That said, commercial deployment faces hurdles: constrained domestic supply chains, manufacturing scale-up challenges, and near-term costs. Lazard analysis cited in reporting estimates first-generation SMR-generated electricity could cost around $214/MWh — higher than most newly built plants except the costliest gas turbines — though proponents argue factory-built reactors will cut costs over time. How this fits Paradigm’s strategy Paradigm has said it will remain “first in crypto” while also deploying capital to technologies that sit alongside advances in software and hardware. The firm points to non-blockchain investments such as Zipline, SendCutSend, True Anomaly and Nous Research, and continues internal work combining blockchain and AI — for example EVMbench (with OpenAI) for smart contract security testing and ongoing open-source projects like Foundry and Reth. Antares slots into that thesis by tying energy infrastructure to the compute demands of modern AI and future blockchain systems. Bottom line Paradigm’s lead in Antares’ $470 million round underscores a broader shift: crypto-focused capital is increasingly flowing into physical infrastructure bets — from AI and robotics to power generation — that aim to support the next wave of large-scale computing. Antares’ Mark-0 milestone and Pentagon program placement make it a high-profile entry in the advanced-nuclear cohort, but commercial economics and manufacturing scale remain the key tests ahead. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news