Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps

The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.31T

Market Cap

$2.31T

24h Trading Volume

$70.34B

BTC Dominance

56.22%

#
Name
Price
1h %
24h %
7d %
Market Cap
Volume (24h)
Chart (7d)

No cryptocurrencies found

Try adjusting your search query

Showing 100 of 15041 cryptocurrencies

Latest Crypto News

View All News
BIND and Petersen push peso stablecoins for corporates despite Argentina's bank crypto ban

BIND and Petersen push peso stablecoins for corporates despite Argentina's bank crypto ban

Headline: Argentine banks push peso stablecoins for corporates as BIND and Petersen advance projects Argentina’s banking groups are quietly building peso-backed stablecoins aimed squarely at businesses — a move that could digitize corporate treasury operations even as private banks remain barred from offering crypto services directly. Two separate initiatives, reported by local outlet Iproup, are being developed by banking-backed financial groups through licensed virtual-asset subsidiaries. Unlike retail-focused dollar-backed tokens many Argentines use to hedge peso depreciation, these new projects are explicitly designed for institutional use: programmable payments, collateral management and automated treasury settlement on blockchain rails. What’s being built - BIND Group: The $2+ billion asset manager that owns BIND Banco Industrial is developing a peso stablecoin through BEN, its virtual asset service provider. BEN earlier this year partnered with Circle to give institutional clients access to USDC for treasury and payments under Argentina’s regulatory framework. - Petersen Group: A second stablecoin called DIPE is being advanced by a Petersen subsidiary with technical support from crypto infrastructure firm Lirium. DIPE already has a published whitepaper, indicating progress beyond initial concept. Target users and use cases Both initiatives target corporate treasuries — not consumer rails. The tokens are pitched for programmable payment conditions (transactions triggered by on-chain events), collateral-backed lending arrangements, and streamlined treasury settlement. By operating through licensed virtual-asset arms rather than the banks themselves, the projects currently sit outside the Argentine Central Bank’s restriction that has prevented private banks from offering crypto services since May 2022. Regulatory backdrop and hurdles Argentine authorities are reportedly assessing whether to relax the central bank’s ban, though no formal policy shift has been announced. Regulatory scrutiny is already in evidence: in March, the country’s national securities regulator challenged the argt peso stablecoin, arguing it constituted a security offered without proper compliance. Not the first peso token idea These private-sector efforts follow earlier public-sector experimentation. In December 2022, San Luis province passed legislation to create a state-backed CityCoin (Activo Digital San Luis de Ahorro), intended to be backed by government liquid assets and used for blockchain-based public services and admin efficiencies. The provincial project targeted residents and public-sector use, whereas BIND’s and Petersen’s tokens are private, enterprise-focused initiatives. Regional and global context Stablecoin use is gaining traction across Latin America’s banking and fintech ecosystems. Tether reportedly invested $20 million in Argentine digital bank Ualá as part of a $197 million round, following the company’s backing of Brazilian exchange Mercado Bitcoin and Argentine platform Belo — moves that underline growing interest in digital payment infrastructure across the region. In the Philippines, the Bank of the Philippine Islands launched a pilot settling cross-border remittances on stablecoin rails before converting into pesos within the regulated banking system. Market snapshot Even as the global stablecoin market recorded a 2.39% contraction in June to roughly $312 billion, on-chain activity remained intense: Visa’s Allium-adjusted dashboard showed stablecoin transaction volume hit a record $1.79 trillion in June, reflecting ongoing high usage across exchange flows, DeFi, lending and on/off-ramps. Why it matters If Argentine banking groups can safely roll out peso stablecoins for corporates, the products could modernize treasury operations and enable automated, programmable financial arrangements within regulated channels. Adoption will hinge on how regulators respond — whether existing restrictions stay in place, are clarified, or are eased to let banks play a direct role in digital asset services. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

One Pre-Market SK Hynix Print Sends Hyperliquid Perp Down ~18%, Spotlights Oracle Risk

One Pre-Market SK Hynix Print Sends Hyperliquid Perp Down ~18%, Spotlights Oracle Risk

Hyperliquid’s SK Hynix perpetual contract plunged nearly 18% on July 28 after a lone, unusually low pre-market trade in South Korea fed through the contract’s oracle — spotlighting a structural risk for continuously traded crypto derivatives that reference thin, local equity markets. What happened - Shortly after NextTrade (NXT) opened pre-market trading, one SK Hynix share printed at KRW 1.272 million — roughly 29.96% below the previous close of KRW 1.816 million. That single trade briefly hit the stock’s daily lower limit and appears to have been an order error exacerbated by low early-session liquidity. - Because the perp’s oracle tracked the Korean-won price of one SK Hynix share and converted it to USD, that isolated print passed into the on-chain price feed. Hyperliquid’s SK Hynix perpetual (listed as xyz:SKHX and shown on the UI as SKHYNIX‑USDC, with up to 10x leverage) briefly dropped about 17.9%, moving from roughly $1,128.20 to $927 before recovering above $1,100. Who runs the market and what’s being done - Hyperliquid says the market was deployed and is operated by Trade.xyz under the HIP-3 framework. Trade.xyz is investigating and plans to publish an update once its review is complete (statement reported by ChainThink). - On-chain trackers including HyperInsight and DeFiLlama logged the event: DeFiLlama later showed SKHX near $1,067 (about -13.7% over 24 hours), open interest around $406 million (down ~20%), and daily volume north of $1 billion. SK Hynix’s Seoul close was KRW 1.55 million (down 14.65%), less severe than the early one-share print. Why this passed through the oracle - Trade.xyz’s documentation says the SKHX oracle tracks one common SK Hynix share priced in won, then converts to USD using the prevailing exchange rate. Hyperliquid’s API allows deployers to supply oracle prices, external perpetual prices and up to two additional mark-price inputs; the protocol then blends those with a local price derived from the order book (best bid/ask and latest trade). - That design means a single outlier print on a thin pre-market can materially move the on-chain mark price, with potential knock-on effects: leveraged positions tied to mark price can face liquidations or automatic deleveraging as the contract re-prices. Risk model and governance context - HIP-3 enables independent teams to launch perpetual markets on Hyperliquid while leveraging the network’s order books, margin and liquidation systems. Deployers define the contract, choose oracles, set leverage limits and control settlement. They must stake 500,000 HYPE and can be slashed for misconduct. - The framework expands tradable assets but places much of the market-level risk management (oracle selection, filters, surge protections) into the hands of deployers — which makes each deployer’s price methodology central to platform safety. Status and open questions - There is no verified evidence that Hyperliquid’s blockchain or smart contracts were compromised; the incident appears to be an external market print entering the deployer’s oracle pipeline. - Key unanswered items include exactly which NXT price inputs were used, whether configured filters and protections operated as intended, and whether any adjustments to safeguards or oracle design will be made. - Trading remained active after the anomaly. Hyperliquid’s docs permit deployers to halt trading, adjust open-interest limits or settle contracts, but Trade.xyz had not announced any permanent suspension for SKHX at the time of reporting. Broader takeaways - This episode underscores how continuously running crypto derivatives can be vulnerable to abrupt prints in thin, time-limited local markets — a concern as more DEXs list perpetuals on Korean stocks and other venues with narrow liquidity windows. - The next verified update is expected from Trade.xyz; its final assessment should clarify whether the contract behaved per published rules or whether oracle methodology and safeguards need revision. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Paradigm Moves Beyond Crypto, Leads $470M Round for Antares Nuclear SMRs

Paradigm Moves Beyond Crypto, Leads $470M Round for Antares Nuclear SMRs

Paradigm is pushing further beyond crypto — and into nuclear. The crypto-focused venture firm led a $470 million Series C for Antares Nuclear, a startup building compact small modular reactors (SMRs) aimed at U.S. military customers. The financing, reported by TechCrunch, breaks down to $370 million of equity and $100 million of debt. Caffeinated Capital co-led the round, with participation from Industrious Ventures, Point72 Ventures, and Shine Capital. Why it matters to crypto investors Paradigm closed a $1.2 billion fourth fund just weeks earlier and has made clear it will keep “first in crypto” as its anchor while allocating capital to adjacent frontier technologies — AI, robotics, aerospace, manufacturing and the like. Antares now joins an expanding portfolio that already includes non-blockchain bets such as Zipline, SendCutSend, True Anomaly, and Nous Research. For a crypto audience, the move highlights how venture capital tied to digital assets is increasingly diversifying into underlying compute and power infrastructure that will shape the future of large-scale computing and AI. What Antares is building Antares focuses on compact reactors that produce between 100 kilowatts and 1 megawatt of electricity — what the company says is enough to power roughly 750 homes at the high end. Its demonstration reactor, Mark-0, reached criticality on June 4 at Idaho National Laboratory — a key milestone showing a sustained, controlled nuclear chain reaction. Military-first go-to-market Rather than chasing utilities, Antares is targeting government and defense customers. It is one of three finalists for the Pentagon’s Advanced Nuclear Power for Installations program, which will evaluate SMRs at Air Force bases in Colorado and Montana. Antares expects its first electricity-producing reactor to be online next year and hopes to begin deployments to U.S. military installations in 2028 if development proceeds on schedule. Technology highlights Antares uses TRISO fuel — uranium kernels encased in multiple carbon and ceramic layers designed to retain fission products at very high temperatures. TRISO is a common choice among advanced reactor developers and can pair with non-water cooling systems such as helium gas or molten salts, enabling designs that differ from conventional water-cooled reactors. Broader market context Investor interest in advanced nuclear has been accelerating as hyperscale data centers and broader electrification push demand for reliable, continuous power. Large AI models and data centers place particular pressure on baseload generation, driving VCs to companies developing reactors meant for industrial sites, government facilities, and computing infrastructure. Recent milestones in the sector include X-energy’s $1 billion IPO in April and >$100 million funding rounds raised since last December by Radiant Energy, Standard Nuclear, and Last Energy. Headwinds remain Commercial rollouts of advanced reactors face supply-chain constraints and manufacturing scale challenges. Proponents argue factory-built reactors will reduce costs over time, but those benefits can take years to realize. Lazard analysis cited by TechCrunch estimates first-generation SMR electricity could cost about $214 per megawatt-hour — higher than most newly built power plants, except the most expensive gas turbines. Where this fits for Paradigm The Antares deal underscores Paradigm’s dual strategy: keep crypto at the core while backing complementary infrastructure in AI and hardware. The firm also pointed to internal projects merging blockchain and AI — such as EVMbench, developed with OpenAI to test AI agents for smart contract security — and continued contributions to open-source blockchain tools like Foundry and Reth. Investing in Antares gives Paradigm exposure to an industry that could supply dependable power to the next wave of computing demand that both AI and blockchain applications will create. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

OKX Android App Returns to South Korea's Google Play After 4-Day Removal; Bybit Still Blocked

OKX Android App Returns to South Korea's Google Play After 4-Day Removal; Bybit Still Blocked

Headline: OKX Android app returns to South Korea’s Google Play after four-day removal; Bybit still blocked OKX’s Android app has reappeared on South Korea’s Google Play Store, returning to search results and allowing new installs and updates after a four-day disappearance, Digital Asset reported on July 28. The OKX: Trade Bitcoin & Crypto app resumed normal distribution as of 8:00 a.m. local time on July 28, following its removal from the Korean Play Store on July 24. Bybit’s app remains unavailable. Digital Asset noted that Bybit’s Android client has been blocked from search and installation since July 10, and was still inaccessible at the time of the latest report. This marks the first reversal among a wave of overseas crypto exchange apps that became restricted on Korea’s Play Store in recent weeks. A Digital Asset investigation published July 24 found at least 29 overseas cryptocurrency derivatives exchange apps were unavailable on the Korean version of Google Play: 17 could not be found by search, six showed an “Unavailable” notice, and six displayed a “service not available in your region” message. OKX and Bybit were both among the affected apps in that review. Digital Asset’s earlier analysis split the affected platforms into two groups. Fourteen had been flagged by South Korea’s Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) as unreported virtual asset service providers (VASPs) and referred to law enforcement — examples included KuCoin, MEXC, BingX, XT.COM, LBank and CoinW. The other 15, which included OKX, Bybit, Gemini, WhiteBIT and BitMEX, had not been publicly referred by the FIU but were nonetheless unavailable on Google Play. According to the outlet, Google has said the restrictions were applied under its own policies rather than directly at the request of South Korean authorities. Even when Android apps were restricted, affected users could generally still access exchanges via their websites or Apple’s App Store. The removals come amid intensified Korean oversight of overseas crypto firms that have not registered locally. Earlier this year the FIU classified such firms as unreported VASPs under the Special Financial Information Act, and Google introduced a policy restricting downloads and updates for those exchange apps on Google Play. Enforcement of the policy did not take effect all at once; Digital Asset observed a gradual rollout of restrictions through 2026. Regulatory pressure in Korea extends beyond app distribution. Financial Services Commission Chair Lee Eog-won recently said authorities had investigated more than 40 suspected cases of unfair crypto trading in the first two years since the Virtual Asset User Protection Act, referring over 30 cases to investigative agencies and expanding AI-driven market surveillance. OKX’s app restoration comes as the exchange continues to expand regulated services internationally. This month OKX Europe launched a one-way conversion service allowing customers in 30 EU/EEA countries to deposit USDT and voluntarily convert holdings into MiCA-compliant USDC after European trading venues tightened Tether support. OKX has also been building its institutional business: on July 20, former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo joined OKX’s board after advising the company since 2023 on U.S. regulatory and institutional strategy. The exchange has further pursued U.S. growth following the 2025 relaunch of its U.S. exchange and self-custody wallet. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Zcash Goes Live With Ironwood — "Turnstile" Locks Out Fake ZEC, Migration Privacy Warning

Zcash Goes Live With Ironwood — "Turnstile" Locks Out Fake ZEC, Migration Privacy Warning

Zcash has flipped the switch on Ironwood, a long-anticipated upgrade designed to close a loophole that once sent the privacy coin into turmoil — and to make sure any counterfeit ZEC can never re-enter circulation. What happened - In May, security researcher Taylor Hornby (using Claude Opus 4.8) uncovered a four-year-old flaw in Zcash’s Orchard shielded pool that could have let an attacker mint counterfeit ZEC. Developers patched the bug in June, but because shielded transactions hide their details, there was no way to prove whether the vulnerability had been exploited. - The uncertainty triggered a sharp market shakeout: Zcash plunged about 38% as investors questioned the integrity of supply. What Ironwood does - The upgrade retires the Orchard shielded pool (which held roughly 3.7 million ZEC — about $1.7 billion at current prices) and moves users into a new shielded pool with stricter controls. - Ironwood implements a “turnstile” accounting mechanism that prevents more ZEC from leaving the old pool than can be verifiably deposited into it. In effect, any forged coins — if they exist — would be permanently trapped and unable to contaminate circulation. - The upgrade also adds quantum-resistant transaction records and a formally verified proof circuit intended to lower the risk of similar vulnerabilities going forward, while keeping Zcash’s privacy guarantees intact. Market and rollout - News of Ironwood’s proposal helped ZEC recover roughly $2.5 billion in market value in early June. The coin now trades around $464 and sits just under an $8 billion market capitalization. - By July, developers finished extensive testing and exchanges, wallets and mining pools prepared for the switch. Ironwood is now live. Privacy caveats and user guidance - Some critics, including privacy infrastructure provider Nym, warn that the mandatory migration could create a temporary privacy exposure. Nym notes that because every holder must move funds into the new pool, migrations performed without protections could link a user’s IP address to their wallet balance. - Zcash developers have urged users not to rush migrations and to use privacy tools — for example Tor or NymVPN — when moving funds to minimize any address-to-IP linkage. Bottom line Ironwood aims to close a critical security hole and reassure markets by making any hypothetical counterfeit ZEC inert. The upgrade brings stronger cryptographic guarantees and new accounting rules, but users should follow migration guidance and use anonymity tools to avoid short-term privacy risks. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

Claude Opus 5 Auto‑Builds Playable Web FPS — A Wakeup Call for Web3 Game Dev

Claude Opus 5 Auto‑Builds Playable Web FPS — A Wakeup Call for Web3 Game Dev

Two days after Anthropic shipped Claude Opus 5, an AI investor dropped a jaw‑dropping demo: a fully playable first‑person shooter the model built end‑to‑end inside the browser—with zero external assets. What happened - On July 25, 2026, AI investor and former HyperWrite CEO Matt Shumer posted a video showing a playable FPS that Claude Opus 5 apparently created entirely on its own. Shumer’s tweet: “Claude Opus 5 one‑shot this game. EVERYTHING you see in this demo is custom code... not a single external asset was used.” - He published the full prompt and the codebase on GitHub. The game runs in Three.js/WebGL2, with roughly 55,000 lines of code across 11 subsystems. Textures, meshes, animations and sounds are all generated in the browser at load time—no downloaded models, HDRIs, images or audio files. The surprisingly short prompt - The prompt was only three short paragraphs. It told Opus 5 to build a shooter on par with modern Call of Duty titles, to spawn subagents—workers that each get their own memory and narrow task—and to repeatedly test every piece against real Call of Duty footage in blind side‑by‑side comparisons. The target: “utterly perfect.” - That brief approach upends recent prompt‑engineering orthodoxy, which recommended specifying measurable criteria rather than vague adjectives like “AAA.” Instead, Shumer’s brief leaned on internal critics: tell subagents to make things that “utterly wow” a separate critic and let that critic enforce the bar. The Gauntlet Loop and Claude Code features - Shumer calls the method the Gauntlet Loop: give an agent a concrete, inspectable bar, split work into focused subagents, and route each piece through a critic that doesn’t inherit the builder’s internal reasoning. - Two Claude Code features made this possible: - Subagents run in isolated context windows with their own instructions and tool access, so critics evaluate outputs without bias. - Ultracode forces the model to use high‑effort reasoning and auto‑orchestrate, fanning out work across dozens of agents (Claude Code can run up to 16 agents concurrently and is capped at 1,000 agents per run). - Anthropic’s built‑in /loop skill keeps the process cycling: fix, test, adjust. Shumer let the critic keep naming gaps and the builders chase them for hours; he didn’t preset a number of rounds. How good is it? - Shumer’s critic log (published with the repo) shows scores climbing from 3.59/10 to just above 5, but still trailing the Call of Duty footage in every logged round. Skeptics suspected hidden human coding, so Shumer released the prompt and code to prove otherwise. Copycats and variations - The short prompt spread fast. James Altucher used the same prompt on Opus 5 and reported “a little over ten hours” and ~1.3 million tokens to produce Operation Blackout, which is playable in the browser. - Developer Rich (Atom Tan Studio) ran the prompt on OpenAI’s GPT‑5.6 top tier (“Sol 5.6 Ultra”) and shared a demo. - Leon Lin took the opposite approach: he reverse‑engineered a very detailed prompt—about 20 sections covering ragdoll physics, cascaded shadow maps, etc.—and fed it into Cursor with plain Opus 5 on high effort, no subagents or ultracode. His in‑browser shooter, Dust Corridor, also looks strong. - Important caveat: none of the follow‑up builds have undergone the blind side‑by‑side test that Shumer used. They’re impressive demos, but not yet judged by the same critic benchmark. Why “built from scratch” is still debatable - Agentic coding tools act a lot like a supervised junior dev: they read files, run code, inspect generated outputs, and iterate. The Gauntlet Loop is a straightforward way to structure that process. - However, the shooter pattern itself is heavily documented and tutorialized. Three.js supplies pointer‑lock camera controls as an example, and mouse‑look, WASD movement, and raycast‑based shooting have appeared in countless public repos, gists and tutorials for years. - A model trained on public code has almost certainly seen hundreds of near‑identical shooters. Researchers call this data contamination: a model succeeds because similar examples existed in its training data, not necessarily because it independently invented the system. - Shumer’s repo does contain original orchestration and iterations from Claude, but “built from scratch” should be read as “assembled and refined by an agent within a well‑trodden genre,” not as evidence of wholly novel invention. What this means for crypto and game dev - Rapid prototyping: If models can stitch playable FPS code and assets together quickly, web and blockchain game studios could prototype gameplay and token mechanics far faster, reducing dev cycles and costs. - Web3 game assets: On‑the‑fly, in‑browser asset generation opens interesting possibilities for procedurally minted NFTs or ephemeral in‑game items created at load time—though provenance and on‑chain verification would need careful handling. - Composability and automation: Agentic workflows could automate routine engineering work, enabling smaller teams or DAOs to manage complex game projects through modular agents and critics. - IP, attribution and contamination: Who owns code and assets generated by models trained on public repos? Data contamination heightens legal, ethical and licensing questions—especially relevant for tokenized games that monetize or mint assets. - Quality and trust: The demos show fast capability, not guaranteed parity with studio-grade titles. Blind testing, benchmarks and reproducibility will matter if studios rely on agentic tools for production releases. Bottom line Claude Opus 5’s demo is a striking showcase of what agentic coding and aggressive looped critique can do: a playable, attractive web FPS created with a tiny brief and automated iteration. But it’s not a magical “from nothing” invention—models reuse patterns they’ve seen, and the line between remix and original work remains blurred. For crypto game builders and web3 studios, the real takeaway is opportunity: agentic AI can accelerate prototyping and unlock new workflows—but legal, quality and provenance challenges will need to be solved before it becomes a production standard. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news