Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.61T
Market Cap
$2.61T
24h Trading Volume
$149.59B
BTC Dominance
56.75%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Druckenmiller Says Stablecoins Could Power Global Payments in 10–15 Years; Ethereum Key
Veteran investor Stanley Druckenmiller has staked a bold claim on the future of money: stablecoins could power the global payments system within the next 10 to 15 years. In a post shared by Etherealize on X, Druckenmiller argued that blockchain-based money offers clear advantages—faster settlement, greater efficiency and much lower costs—that could make stablecoins a practical backbone for payments worldwide. Druckenmiller’s comments align with his increasing exposure to the Ethereum ecosystem. He’s named among backers of BitMine (BMNR), an Ethereum-focused treasury firm chaired by Tom Lee that reportedly holds more than $10 billion in ETH. Other notable supporters of the project include ARK Invest and Bill Miller. Druckenmiller has framed stablecoins and blockchain rails not just as speculative assets but as productivity-enhancing tools for investors and institutions. Institutional debate: open vs. proprietary rails A recent announcement from Cari has intensified a debate over how institutional blockchain infrastructure should be built. Analyst “Alex” pushed back on the idea that architecture is the only issue, saying the bigger question is business model: proprietary networks versus open standards. Proprietary systems such as Canton or Tempo, Alex notes, can end up controlled by a small group that holds disproportionate voting power. While technically permissionless, these networks may use opaque admission processes that allow the most influential participants to later set terms of access and pricing—a dynamic that mirrors how legacy payment networks like SWIFT and Visa consolidated market power. Banks, he says, are happy to claim they want to build a “SWIFT-killer,” but reluctant to join someone else’s. Why Ethereum matters That’s where Ethereum, according to Alex and supporters like Druckenmiller, stands apart. They argue Ethereum functions as a neutral settlement layer immune to capture by a single coalition—no participant can credibly threaten to rewrite the rules to benefit themselves later. From a game-theory perspective, Alex contends, that neutrality makes ETH the only sustainable long-term equilibrium for a global institutional settlement layer. Bottom line Druckenmiller’s endorsement adds weight to a growing institutional narrative: stablecoins and blockchain rails could reshape payments, and the choice between proprietary networks and open platforms like Ethereum will determine who controls the future plumbing of finance. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Crypto Patel: BNB Could Hit $3,000 by 2028 — But May Retest ~$400 First
Headline: Analyst Crypto Patel Says BNB Could Hit $3,000 by 2028 — But a $400 Retest May Come First Crypto analyst Crypto Patel has outlined a bold roadmap that could see BNB reach a new all-time high of $3,000 by 2028 — though he warns the token may first revisit deep discount levels near $400. Patel’s setup: how the run to $3,000 could unfold - Patel says BNB recently bounced cleanly off the 0.5 Fibonacci retracement level and has climbed roughly 21% from that low. If price holds above the 0.5 Fib zone, he argues, a new-ATH setup would be in play. - He also warns of a downside trigger: a break below $526 could open the door to a fall into a “second accumulation zone” between $450 and $380 (the “best discount zone”), after an earlier accumulation level around $600. - Patel’s personal target is $3,000, which he thinks could arrive during the next altcoin season — though he wouldn’t be surprised to see a retest of ~$400 before any massive rally. Market backdrop: geopolitics and macro pressure - BNB’s upside is not happening in a vacuum. The broader crypto market is under pressure amid the U.S.-Iran conflict, now entering its fourth week. Oil spiked after recent attacks on energy infrastructure in the Middle East, contributing to a sharp crypto sell-off and sparking inflation concerns — a macro headwind for risk assets like BNB. Other analysts weigh in - CryptoPulse says BNB is showing a structural shift. After attempting an upside breakout inside an ascending channel, the token has broken below the channel’s lower bound. If that level flips to resistance, CryptoPulse warns of further downside. - Analyst Batman offers a more bullish take: BNB is holding above a key confluence — including a bullish FVG (fair value gap) and the 0.618 Fibonacci level. He notes that as long as BNB remains above $610, a rally remains possible. Price snapshot - At the time of writing, CoinMarketCap shows BNB trading around $642, down in the past 24 hours. What to watch - Key levels to monitor: $526 (break could signal deeper declines), $450–$380 (Patel’s “best discount zone”), $610 (Batman’s bullish threshold), and the 0.5 Fib retracement (current support that could validate an ATH run). Bottom line: Analysts differ on timing and path, but the story is simple — hold above the 0.5 Fib and bulls can argue for a long-term push toward Patel’s $3,000 target; breach key supports and BNB may need to clear a deeper washout before resuming any sustained climb. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Tom Lee: DeMark 1987 Analog and On-Chain Data Show ETH May Have Bottomed
Tom Lee used the stage at Hong Kong’s 3rd Futu Expo (March 13–14) to make a bullish, data-driven case that Ethereum may already be at — or very close to — a cyclical bottom. What he argued - Lee said Bitmine advisor and veteran market-timer Tom DeMark found a striking similarity between Ethereum’s recent price action and two major S&P 500 selloffs: the 1987 crash and the 2011 decline. According to DeMark’s mapping, Ethereum’s pattern shows a 93% correlation with the 1987 move and also lines up with the 2011 bottom. - If the 1987 analog is the right model, Lee said ETH had already bottomed on March 7; if the 2011 analog is the better fit, the market is bottoming now. Either way, his takeaway: “we think we’re at the bottom or exiting the crypto winter now.” On-chain evidence Lee highlighted - He pointed to Ethereum’s realized price — an on-chain metric that approximates the average acquisition cost of coins based on when they last moved on-chain — which he said sits at $2,241. - Using realized price as a baseline, Lee noted prior exhaustion levels: in 2022 ETH fell to a roughly 39% discount to realized price; in 2025 that discount reached about 21% before a rebound. “Currently, we’re at 22%,” he said, putting today’s drawdown in the same zone where last year’s reversal began. By that metric, the selloff could be reaching exhaustion. Why it matters - Lee’s argument blends chart analogs with on-chain cost-basis data to claim the market has reached the kind of holder “pain” that historically marks cycle lows — suggesting a bottom may not require a pristine macro backdrop or a new narrative cycle to form. Long-term context - Lee also reminded the audience of Ethereum’s decade-long outperformance: “In the last 10 years, Ethereum’s return is 49,000%,” he said — roughly 490x — and contrasted that with Bitcoin’s 11,000% and Nvidia’s ~65x over the same period. Market snapshot - At press time ETH traded at $2,147. Lee’s thesis will likely invite debate: pattern-matching to past crashes and realized-price thresholds are popular but not definitive signals. Still, his presentation — pairing DeMark’s historical analogs with on-chain cost-basis data — gives bulls a clear framework to argue that the worst of the selloff may be behind Ethereum. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Whales Buy in Amid $541M Liquidations as Deribit Expiry Pins BTC to $70K
Whales quietly moved back into buy mode over the past two weeks — even as the crypto market endured one of its harshest single-day liquidation waves in recent memory. The shock came around Friday’s Deribit options expiry. Traders settled 24,838 March contracts with a combined notional value of $1.72 billion, and Bitcoin landed squarely on the $70,000 strike — the textbook “max pain” level where the greatest number of options expire worthless. That concentration of open interest effectively pinned BTC to a narrow trading band, with market participants expecting price to hold between roughly $69,000 and $71,000 until contracts finish settling. “Max pain” isn’t accidental: when option open interest is heavily clustered at a strike, market dynamics often drive the price toward that level as expiry approaches, allowing option sellers (typically institutional market makers) to minimize payouts. Price action underlined the squeeze. Bitcoin slipped about 1.4% from midnight Thursday to settle near $70,000 as derivatives desks monitored the expiry closely. Liquidations were extensive. Over a 24-hour stretch, 141,810 traders were liquidated for total losses of roughly $541 million. The breakdown favors the short side of the market’s pain: leveraged long positions absorbed about $443 million (≈80% of total liquidations), while shorts lost about $97 million. Key liquidation figures: - Bitcoin: $191 million wiped out - Ether: $165 million wiped out - Single-largest loss: an $18 million ETH/USDT position on the Aster exchange A time-based view shows how the damage accumulated: liquidations were relatively modest in a one-hour snapshot ($18 million), jumped to $126 million across four hours, and surged to $300 million over 12 hours — driven almost entirely by buyers using leverage who were caught off-side by the move. Other market metrics pointed to capital leaving the space. Futures open interest fell 5.6% to approximately $107 billion overall. Ether futures activity dropped 9% while ETH spot fell about 6%, suggesting more than mere price adjustment — traders were pulling capital out. Funding rates for Bitcoin, Ether, Solana and BNB flipped negative, signaling renewed demand for short exposure and a shift in market sentiment. Still, the quieter story beneath the chaos is that large wallets have been accumulating — a dynamic that could matter as the market digests the expiry fallout and funding-driven flows cool off. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Sykodelic: Bitcoin Follows Business Cycles, Not the Four-Year Halving Narrative
A prominent crypto analyst is challenging the conventional wisdom on Bitcoin’s market rhythm — and offering a different lens for investors and traders to use. On March 17, market commentator Sykodelic took to X to argue that the often-cited “four-year cycle” (the halving-driven model many traders rely on) is fundamentally flawed. He says that model is built on just a couple of historical data points and is anchored to time instead of any underlying economic logic. By contrast, Sykodelic claims a business-cycle framework — one tied to liquidity, economic performance and broad market behavior — gives a far clearer picture of where crypto stands. What he says actually drives the cycle - Sequence over timing: Using charts, Sykodelic lays out a repeatable market sequence he believes has played out across cycles. Gold tends to rally during economic contraction and uncertainty, then peaks when the ISM Manufacturing Index flips back into expansion. - Macro certainty kicks off the real bull: Once economic indicators return to expansion and macro uncertainty recedes, risk assets enter a genuine bull phase and Bitcoin Dominance (BTC.D) typically falls as the cycle matures. - Business cycle as the governor: He argues these patterns occur because the crypto cycle is subordinate to the broader business and liquidity cycle — not simply the time elapsed since the last halving. Why this cycle “feels” different Sykodelic says the current market’s strange feel is less about novelty and more about misreading. Traders are fixated on the Bitcoin price chart and the four-year narrative, he says, so they miss the actual business-cycle signals. He also points to behavioral biases: people tend to defend familiar, past patterns rather than accept outcomes that haven’t happened yet — making many vulnerable to surprise in the present cycle. The charts and the observable evidence According to Sykodelic, several concrete trends back up his thesis: - This cycle has been weaker than prior cycles. - Many altcoins have failed to stage sustained breakouts even while gold has posted historic rallies. He attributes these phenomena to a prolonged contraction in the business cycle that suppressed the liquidity and risk-appetite needed for a typical crypto-led risk-asset explosion. Bottom line for investors Sykodelic’s conclusion: the market is not necessarily headed lower — instead, many bearish positions are rooted in a potentially faulty four-year-cycle framework. His practical implication for traders is to watch macro indicators (ISM, liquidity conditions, gold, BTC.D) as leading signals for cycle turns, rather than relying solely on calendar-based halving narratives. Whether you accept his interpretation or not, the post is a reminder that macroeconomic context can be as important — or more so — than crypto-specific milestones when timing trades and positioning portfolios. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Whales Retreat: ETH Inflows Drop to 135k as Price Holds Near $2,150
Ethereum is trading around $2,150 as volatility in the crypto market continues to create an uncertain backdrop. After a sharp decline that accelerated in early February — which saw ETH break down from the $3,000–$3,300 area and briefly slip below $2,000 — the token has found tentative footing, but momentum remains fragile and rallies have struggled to gain conviction. On-chain data is adding clarity to the picture. CryptoQuant analyst Arab Chain highlights the Ethereum Exchange Inflow (Top10) metric on Binance, which tracks transfers from the largest wallets to the exchange as a proxy for whale behavior. The latest snapshot shows ETH changing hands near $2,137 while inflows from the top 10 wallets totaled roughly 135,573 ETH — a dramatic drop from prior peaks that exceeded one million ETH. That fall in whale transfers is meaningful. Lower top-wallet inflows suggest large holders are less actively depositing into exchanges, which can signal reduced immediate selling pressure. At the same time, it also indicates a lack of aggressive repositioning by majors; whales are cautious rather than bullishly reallocating. Moving averages of these inflows provide a clearer temporal lens: - EMA(7): ~140,265 ETH - EMA(14): ~140,853 ETH - EMA(30): ~151,694 ETH - EMA(50): ~158,203 ETH - EMA(100): ~159,307 ETH The current inflow figure (~135k ETH) sits below most of those EMAs, reinforcing the idea that short-term selling pressure has eased. The convergence of EMA(7) and EMA(14) points to near-term stabilization in flows, but the higher EMA(50) and EMA(100) show that overall deposit activity remains well below historical levels — suggesting the market is still normalizing after prior heavy selling rather than fully moving to a neutral stance. Technically, ETH’s structure is still bearish across multiple timeframes. Price remains under the 50-, 100- and 200-day moving averages, all sloping downward, and recent bounce attempts have been rejected near short-term resistance. Volume patterns underscore the imbalance: the biggest spikes occurred during the sell-off, implying capitulation-driven exits rather than accumulation by buyers. What traders are watching now: - Pivot zone: $2,100–$2,200 — holding this range would be important for short-term stability. - Upside target on a sustained breakout: ~ $2,400. - Downside risk: failure to hold current levels could prompt another retest of the recent lows. Bottom line: on-chain signals point to quieter whale activity and moderated selling pressure, but macro momentum and moving-average resistance keep Ethereum’s recovery tentative. Traders will be watching both price action and whale inflows for signs that conviction is returning. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news