Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.35T
Market Cap
$2.35T
24h Trading Volume
$141.09B
BTC Dominance
56.47%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Yuan Quietly Displaces Dollar in Africa — A Boost for CBDCs and Crypto Rails
China’s yuan is quietly but steadily displacing the US dollar across African trade corridors — a shift with growing economic and payments implications. Trade between China and Africa is on track to approach $400 billion as both exports and imports climb. In 2025 alone, bilateral trade rose 17.7% year‑on‑year, with Chinese exports to Africa jumping 25.8% to $225.03 billion and African imports from China increasing 5.4% to $123.02 billion. That momentum is reflecting in how transactions are settled: more African businesses and banks are using the yuan instead of dollar‑denominated instruments. A key enabler is China’s Cross‑Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS), which streamlines yuan settlement for international transactions. Several major African lenders, including Standard Bank, have joined CIPS, making yuan-denominated settlement a practical and growing option. Ives Yang, head of sales for transactional banking at Standard Bank’s corporate and investment banking unit, told Reuters that yuan trade between China and Africa will continue to expand, driven largely by import‑export flows and efforts to broaden participation across the continent. Beyond payments infrastructure, China has reinforced its economic footprint in Africa through local‑currency deals, Belt and Road Initiative financing, reduced tariffs, expanded market access and loans — all measures that make yuan use more attractive. High dollar exchange costs are another factor: lower exchange fees and more favorable local‑currency rates can save African banks and businesses millions, nudging them away from dollar reliance. Politically and strategically, Beijing — led by Xi Jinping — has pushed the yuan as part of a wider effort to internationalize its currency. While the yuan’s role is still far smaller than the US dollar’s, its rate of growth and the infrastructure supporting it suggest considerable expansion potential. For crypto and payments watchers, this trend matters: it highlights rising demand for efficient cross‑border rails, whether centralized systems like CIPS, central bank digital currencies, or blockchain‑based alternatives. As yuan settlement gains traction in Africa, the global payments landscape — and the competitive space for digital payments solutions and stablecoins — will continue to evolve. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Two Texas Brothers Plead Guilty in $8M Crypto "Wrench Attack" Kidnapping in Minnesota
Two Texas brothers have pleaded guilty in a brazen crypto kidnapping that left a Minnesota family robbed of more than $8 million in digital assets. Isiah Angelo Garcia, 25, and Raymond Christian Garcia, 24, both of Waller, Texas, entered guilty pleas Thursday to one count each of interference with commerce by robbery, the Justice Department said. The pleas were entered before U.S. District Judge Ann Montgomery in Minneapolis. Prosecutors say the brothers flew to Minnesota specifically to carry out the attack. On the morning of September 19, 2025, they forced their way into a home in Grant, a small Minneapolis-area city, held a man and his family at gunpoint for over eight hours, zip-tied them, and coerced access to the victim’s cryptocurrency accounts. Court records state Isiah Garcia even forced the man to drive to the family’s cabin in northern Minnesota to retrieve additional crypto storage devices and to move funds. The brothers ultimately compelled transfers totaling more than $8 million before fleeing after the family’s son managed to call 911. Investigators were able to identify the suspects from items they left at the scene and tracked them to the Houston area, where both men were arrested. According to court filings, the brothers admitted using firearms to threaten the family. “No one should ever feel unsafe in their own home,” said FBI Minneapolis Special Agent in Charge Christopher Dotson, pledging that such “violence and greed” will be aggressively investigated. U.S. Attorney Daniel Rosen said the pleas show a commitment to holding the men “accountable for the choices they made.” Each defendant faces up to 20 years in federal prison and has agreed to pay more than $8 million in restitution. Sentencing dates have not yet been set. The pair were first charged in September, days after the attack, which shook the Grant community and prompted a local high school to cancel a homecoming football game while police searched for the perpetrators. The case joins a growing international trend of so-called “wrench attacks,” in which crypto holders are forced at gunpoint or by other violence to surrender private keys or transfer funds. High-profile U.S. prosecutions include last year’s 47-year federal sentence for Remy St. Felix, convicted in North Carolina for running a violent crypto home-invasion ring. In May, three Tennessee men were indicted over a reported wrench-attack spree in California that allegedly netted $6.5 million. France has also emerged as a hotspot: prosecutors there have charged 88 people, including minors, in dozens of kidnapping investigations, one of which targeted Ledger co-founder David Balland, who was reportedly abducted and mutilated before being rescued. Security experts say many wrench attacks likely go unreported and urge crypto holders to keep holdings and personal security measures out of public view. Law enforcement continues to pursue both violent perpetrators and broader prevention strategies as digital-asset thefts evolve from cyber schemes into dangerous real-world crimes. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Marvell Surges on AWS Trainium Report; AI Demand Drives Massive YTD Rally
Marvell shares hit a fresh milestone on June 17, 2026, climbing to an intraday all-time high of $329.88 before settling near $311 the next day — a roughly 7% bounce — after a Bloomberg report sparked fresh buying interest. The report said Amazon Web Services (AWS) is in early talks to sell its Trainium AI chips to outside customers, and investors quickly priced in a potential growth windfall for Marvell, which helps design significant portions of those chips. Why the move matters - The Trainium story isn’t a Marvell announcement, but it directly ties to the company’s exposure to AI infrastructure: a broader market for Trainium would boost chip design work and demand for Marvell’s networking gear. - Marvell’s recent results already show strong momentum: fiscal Q1 revenue hit a record $2.418 billion, up 28% year over year, with data-center sales accounting for $1.83 billion of that total. - The market has rewarded that performance — the stock is up roughly 258% year-to-date and about 317% over the past 12 months. What management and Amazon are saying - Marvell CEO Matt Murphy raised guidance, saying the company “expects revenue growth to continue accelerating each quarter throughout fiscal 2027,” and pointed to “exceptional AI-related bookings” as the reason for upgraded revenue outlooks for fiscal 2027 and 2028. - Amazon VP of AI infrastructure Peter DeSantis framed the move more broadly: “We view AI infrastructure as rapidly evolving. And we’re constantly looking at ways to get to more customers.” Wall Street’s take and the risk factors - KeyBanc lifted its price target on Marvell from $260 to $385, the most aggressive call on the Street, citing the firm’s optical-networking business as a key upside driver. - That optimism is balanced by risk: Marvell’s forward price/earnings ratio is near 70, leaving limited margin for disappointment. Analysts also note uncertainty around Amazon’s future chip plans — reports suggest AWS could hand newer Trainium3 and Trainium4 work to a rival chipmaker, a move neither company has confirmed. If that happens, recent gains could look overextended. Guidance and positioning - Management’s internal forecast points to roughly $2.7 billion in second-quarter revenue — about a 35% sequential rise — reflecting the upgraded outlook tied to data-center strength and AI bookings. - The broader takeaway for investors: strong fundamental performance and growing exposure to AI infrastructure are driving enthusiasm, but a stretched valuation and the unresolved question of Amazon’s long-term chip strategy are the twin risks to watch over the coming weeks. For crypto traders and investors who track tech and AI market leadership, Marvell’s run is another sign of how AI infrastructure narratives can drive outsized moves across semiconductor and networking stocks — but it’s also a reminder to watch for event-driven reversals when a big customer’s roadmap remains uncertain. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Kalshi Eyes IPO After $2B Run Rate, $16B Monthly Volume — Faces State-Federal Legal Clash
Kalshi is fielding preliminary IPO talks after hitting a $2 billion-plus annualized revenue run rate, according to The Information — and the timing comes as the prediction market operator’s trading activity has surged past $16 billion in a single month. What’s happening - The Information reports Kalshi has held informal conversations with investment banks about a potential initial public offering. The company has not commented to The Block. - The $2 billion annualized revenue run rate marks a steep climb from the roughly $1 billion run rate the Wall Street Journal reported in March, underscoring rapid growth. Funding and scale - Kalshi raised $1 billion in a Series F round at a $22 billion valuation earlier this year. The round was led by Coatue and included Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz, IVP, Paradigm, Morgan Stanley, and ARK Invest. - Trading volumes have followed that momentum: DeFiLlama shows Kalshi did $16.81 billion in volume in May, up from $14.81 billion in April. Rival Polymarket did $7.08 billion in May, down from $9.01 billion in April. Regulatory and legal headwinds - The growth has drawn intense scrutiny from lawmakers, state regulators, gaming groups and federal authorities over how prediction markets should be regulated in the U.S. - Several gaming industry groups — including the American Gaming Association, the Indian Gaming Association, and the Association of Gaming Equipment Manufacturers — recently asked the Senate to add language to pending crypto market-structure legislation (the CLARITY Act) that would explicitly prevent sports- and casino-style prediction markets from operating under federal derivatives rules. Those groups argue such platforms have effectively expanded sports betting nationwide while sidestepping state and tribal gaming regimes. - State-level legal action is mounting: Kentucky this week sued Kalshi, Polymarket and affiliated entities, alleging illegal, unlicensed sports betting in the state. Similar enforcement actions have appeared in Ohio, Nevada, New Jersey, Maryland, Montana, Illinois, New York, Connecticut, Arizona, Wisconsin, New Mexico and others. Federal vs. state jurisdiction - A central legal question is whether prediction-market event contracts fall under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s authority or are subject to state gaming enforcement. - The CFTC recently sued New Mexico after state officials moved against Kalshi, arguing that event contracts listed on federally regulated exchanges fall under the Commodity Exchange Act and are therefore the CFTC’s exclusive jurisdiction. CFTC Chair Michael Selig said New Mexico was attempting to override established law and precedent. - Critics, including former CFTC Chair Gary Gensler, have questioned whether sports-related event contracts behave like traditional swaps, noting they are not used to hedge commercial or economic risks. - Federal regulators say they intend to defend their oversight role while developing a more nuanced framework. The Wall Street Journal reports the agency is considering standards that would evaluate event contracts on a case-by-case basis rather than imposing blanket rules. Why it matters Kalshi’s IPO chatter highlights a broader tension: prediction markets are scaling quickly and attracting major venture capital while the legal framework that will determine their future is still in flux. Any public offering would likely face investor scrutiny tied to regulatory risk — and the ultimate classification of event contracts could reshape the business model for Kalshi and its competitors. Read more: The Information; Wall Street Journal; DeFiLlama; Semafor. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Custodia & Vantage Launch Hazel: Token Acts as Bank Deposit Inside, Stablecoin Outside
Custodia Bank and Vantage Bank have rolled out a novel tokenized payments model that merges traditional bank deposits and stablecoins into a single, dual-purpose digital asset. According to a white paper published June 18, the system—called Hazel—changes its legal and operational identity depending on where it’s held: inside the Hazel banking network it acts as a bank deposit issued by a participating bank; when moved outside the consortium it converts into a stablecoin backed by cash and short-term U.S. Treasury securities. How it works - Inside Hazel: the token is treated as a conventional bank deposit on the issuing bank’s balance sheet, preserving the regulatory and legal characteristics of deposit accounts. - Outside Hazel: the same token functions as an on-chain stablecoin, collateralized with cash and short-term Treasuries, enabling interoperability with external users and crypto platforms. - The protocol is running on Ethereum (live since March) and is currently in bank testing. Custodia and Vantage say they expect an initial rollout to participating banks later this year, with broader availability to banks and customers targeted for Q4 2026. Practical design and goals Hazel is built to sit alongside existing core banking systems, payment rails and ledgers instead of replacing them. That means participating institutions can keep current infrastructure while adding blockchain-based payment services. The platform aims to let banks of all sizes—including community banks and credit unions—offer tokenized deposits and stablecoin rails without shifting customer deposits to third-party stablecoin issuers. Pilot work and demos Vantage and Custodia have already completed proofs of concept, including geolocation-triggered payments using tokenized U.S. dollar deposits—showcasing how programmable money could enable new payment experiences. Why it matters The project arrives amid growing industry momentum for tokenized deposits as an alternative to traditional stablecoins. DeFiLlama data show the stablecoin market expanded to roughly $315 billion from about $251 billion a year earlier, underscoring the rising role of on-chain dollar assets in payments and settlement. Major banking efforts are also underway: The Wall Street Journal recently reported that The Clearing House is preparing a tokenized deposit network that could launch in the first half of 2027 to let banks settle payments with blockchain-based representations of customer deposits. Regulatory backdrop and tensions Hazel’s launch follows custody and regulatory headwinds for Custodia. In March, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit declined to revive Custodia’s legal challenge after regulators denied its application for a Federal Reserve master account—a move Custodia had argued was necessary to settle payments without intermediary banks. Meanwhile, some banks are opposing regulatory proposals that would allow stablecoin issuers to offer yield-bearing products; JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon has said banks will keep contesting parts of the CLARITY Act that he says could let crypto firms compete for deposits without bank charters. Bottom line Hazel represents a hybrid approach that tries to bridge traditional banking safeguards with blockchain-native utility: bank deposit treatment inside a regulated network, and stablecoin utility when used externally. If it scales as planned, the model could lower barriers for smaller banks to offer tokenized payment services while keeping customer deposits within the regulated banking system—but it will face both technical rollout and regulatory scrutiny as it expands. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Crypto Payments Catching On: 1 in 5 UK SMEs Report Customer Interest, Especially Larger Firms
One in five top UK SMEs report customer interest in crypto payments — and that figure jumps among larger firms, a new DECTA whitepaper finds. A survey of 500 UK SME decision‑makers by Censuswide (fieldwork: March 13–20, 2026), published by payments tech provider DECTA, shows cryptocurrency is emerging as a niche but growing payment preference — especially for higher‑turnover and internationally active businesses. Key findings - 11.8% of UK merchants say customers want the option to pay with cryptocurrency. - That share rises to 20.7% for companies with annual turnover of £50m–£99.99m. - When merchants ranked customer payment priorities, crypto came eighth (11.8%), behind payment security (48.6%), simplicity (42.2%), speed (37.2%), multiple payment options, refunds, guest checkout, and Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL). BNPL alone was a top priority for nearly 20% of respondents. - Larger firms showed more interest in both open banking and crypto. DECTA concludes that payment providers that ignore crypto risk being viewed less favourably by some of their largest merchant customers. Cross‑border trade and operational pain points - 53.8% of surveyed SMEs already sell worldwide. - 20.2% of merchants engaged in international trade said their cross‑border payments experience has worsened. - Top business pain points were slow access to funds (19.4%), fraud and security concerns (16%), and opaque payment processing fees (14.2%). - Security matters most overall: 51.8% of merchants would prioritise security over both lower fees and access to the latest payment tech — rising to 62.1% among micro‑businesses (1–9 employees). Industry view and regulatory backdrop DECTA CEO Scott Dawson, who also chairs the Payments Innovation Forum, told crypto.news that alternative payment methods are gaining traction among merchants. The firm’s analysis frames crypto as a minority but meaningful option — particularly for high‑turnover and globally active firms. That commercial interest comes amid heightened regulatory scrutiny in the UK. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) recently warned football clubs about sponsorships with unauthorised crypto firms and is progressing its crypto regulatory framework: firms will be able to apply for authorisation from September 30, 2026, with the full cryptoasset regime taking effect on October 25, 2027. In May, UK authorities sanctioned Huobi Global S.A. (linked to HTX) as part of an enforcement action tied to the A7 network, following FCA legal action against HTX over alleged unlawful promotions to UK consumers. What it means DECTA’s report paints crypto payments as a specialist but growing feature of the UK SME payments landscape — one that matters most to larger, internationally trading merchants. For payment providers and platforms, the takeaways are clear: speed, security and simplicity remain dominant customer demands, but refusing to accommodate crypto could be a competitive drawback when serving bigger merchants with global footprints. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news