Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.35T
Market Cap
$2.35T
24h Trading Volume
$141.09B
BTC Dominance
56.47%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Forced liquidations, not credit woes, spark STRC & SATA intraday rout, Strive CEO says
Strive CEO Matt Cole called Wednesday “the most difficult day in the history of Digital Credit” after sharp intraday moves in two of the company’s income-style products, STRC and SATA, which many market participants blamed on forced liquidations from leveraged positions. What happened STRC plunged to as low as $82.50 before recovering, Cole said on X. SATA slid from par into the low $90s—Jeff Walton later posted that SATA hit an intraday low of $92.88 before bouncing back to $97.71. Cole described the episode as a “leverage liquidation event,” not a sign that the underlying credit quality had deteriorated. Why it unfolded that way Cole and other observers say the rout looked driven by margin pressure: investors who borrowed against supposedly stable income assets were forced to sell when prices moved against them, amplifying the drop. That pattern mirrors past episodes in traditional finance, where leverage and thin markets can turn modest moves into steep selloffs. Cole stressed the selling became disconnected from the underlying credit profile and that forced selling—not a credit event—was the culprit. Strive’s response and product details Strive said its dividend reserves remain intact and that the company is not under stress, able to meet obligations. The moves drew attention because both STRC and SATA sit inside a nascent market for preferred-equity-style digital credit—products that tie income distributions to Bitcoin treasury strategies and public-market structures. SATA was listed on Nasdaq as part of Strive’s Bitcoin treasury and digital credit strategy; the offering raised $160 million via a 2 million-share IPO. After the listing, Strive reported holding 7,525 BTC. SATA is described as a variable-rate preferred equity product that aims to grow Bitcoin per share over time, targets a trading range of $99–$101, and carries a 13% annual dividend rate; it moved to business-day dividend payments starting June 16. Market takeaways The episode highlights how quickly income products can move when leverage interacts with relatively thin markets. A drop below par can attract bargain-hunting buyers—Cole said there was strong demand near intraday lows—but it also raises questions about liquidity, market depth, and the risks of borrowing to boost returns. With the digital credit market still small, Cole suggested investors, issuers, and market makers can learn from the day’s stress. What’s next For investors, the immediate test is whether STRC and SATA can hold their recoveries as liquidation pressure eases. If SATA consistently trades near its $99–$101 target, it would support Strive’s stated market goals; continued volatility would keep leverage and liquidity squarely in focus for this emerging corner of the crypto ecosystem. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
$8M 'Wrench Attack': Texas Brothers Plead Guilty to Armed Crypto Robbery
Two Texas brothers have pleaded guilty in a brazen crypto “wrench attack” that netted more than $8 million and left a Minnesota family traumatized. Isiah Angelo Garcia, 25, and Raymond Christian Garcia, 24, both of Waller, Texas, admitted Thursday to one count of interference with commerce by robbery, U.S. prosecutors said. The brothers entered their pleas before U.S. District Judge Ann Montgomery in Minneapolis after traveling from Texas to Minnesota to carry out the plot. According to court documents, on the morning of September 19, 2025 the pair forced their way into a home in Grant, a small city outside Minneapolis, held a man and his family at gunpoint for more than eight hours, zip-tied them, and demanded access to the victim’s cryptocurrency accounts. At one point Isiah Garcia forced the victim to drive to the family’s remote cabin in northern Minnesota to retrieve additional crypto storage devices and move funds. In total the brothers coerced transfers exceeding $8 million before fleeing when the family’s son was able to call 911. Investigators identified the suspects using items left behind at the scene, tracked them to the Houston area, and arrested them. Both men admitted to using firearms to threaten the family. FBI Minneapolis Special Agent in Charge Christopher Dotson said, “No one should ever feel unsafe in their own home,” and pledged aggressive investigation of such acts. U.S. Attorney Daniel Rosen said the guilty pleas show a commitment to holding the brothers “accountable for the choices they made.” Each defendant faces up to 20 years in federal prison and has agreed to pay more than $8 million in restitution. Sentencing dates have not been set. The brothers were initially charged in September, shortly after the attack, which rattled the Grant community and prompted a local high school to cancel a homecoming football game while police searched for suspects. The case is part of a growing global wave of “wrench attacks,” in which crypto holders are physically coerced into surrendering access to their assets. Prosecutors and security experts say reported incidents are likely only a fraction of actual cases. High-profile U.S. prosecutions have already produced stiff penalties—last year Remy St. Felix was sentenced to 47 years after leading a violent home-invasion crypto ring—and more indictments are ongoing, including a May case alleging a $6.5 million wrench-attack spree in California. Europe has also seen disturbing episodes; French authorities have charged dozens in kidnapping rings that targeted crypto entrepreneurs, including the attack on Ledger co-founder David Balland. Security experts reiterate the same practical advice: keep crypto holdings out of public view, limit the number of people who know about large holdings, and secure private keys and hardware wallets offline. The plea in this case underscores how real-world violence and organized crime increasingly intersect with digital-asset custody. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Crypto Traders Eye GOOG: Analysts Forecast 50% Upside to $550, Buy Dips at $360
Alphabet’s Class C shares (NASDAQ: GOOG) opened Friday at $367, continuing a pullback that began in May after a $408 peak. Traders say the stock has been hit by post-high profit-taking and lingering concerns about tech capital expenditure into Q2, and sentiment on StockWits for GOOGL has cooled to neutral. Still, analyst optimism remains pronounced. On TradingView, 72 analysts have posted one‑year price targets for GOOG, and the consensus is bullish. Many recommend accumulating around current dip levels — specifically near $360 — or “buying the dips” during the downtrend. The crowd’s upside conviction centers on a $550 target: 62 of the 72 analysts expect Google to reach that level within 12 months. Hitting $550 would represent roughly a $183-per-share gain from today’s price — about a 50% increase. To put that in simple terms, a $1,000 stake would grow to roughly $1,500 if the target is met. On the flip side, analysts warn that a broader market wobble could push GOOG down toward $340, roughly a 7.5% drop from current levels — a relatively contained pullback compared with sharper corrections. For crypto traders used to dramatic swings, Google’s risk/reward profile may look attractive: a potentially large upside over the next year, with a downside that analysts characterize as single-digit and manageable. As always, investors should weigh macro headwinds and tech capex questions against the strong analyst conviction before reallocating capital. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
South Korea May Let Fintechs Join New Cross‑Border Crypto Transfer Regime
South Korea may expand its upcoming cross-border crypto transfer regime beyond traditional exchanges, opening the door for fintechs to compete in a market long dominated by a few major players. What’s happening - The government has started drafting enforcement rules for amendments to the Foreign Exchange Transactions Act that were promulgated on June 2 and include a six‑month grace period. The new regime — which classifies cross‑border virtual asset transfers as regulated foreign exchange activity — takes effect in December. - Under the law, businesses that facilitate overseas crypto transfers must register with the Ministry of Economy and Finance and report transactions through the Bank of Korea’s foreign‑exchange reporting network. Applicants will also need existing Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) registration, system connections to authorities that relay FX and digital‑asset transaction data, and to meet facility and personnel standards to be set by presidential decree. Why it matters Cross‑border crypto transfers previously fell outside South Korea’s foreign‑exchange oversight, creating gaps that authorities say raised illicit FX and anti‑money‑laundering risks. Bringing these flows under formal supervision forces operators to report transfers and comply with stricter controls — a major shift for cross‑border crypto flows. Who could apply Current VASP rules have largely limited eligible firms to registered crypto exchanges and certain custodians — meaning big domestic platforms such as Upbit and Bithumb were expected to dominate the new system. But regulators are now weighing whether fintech firms capable of executing cross‑border transfers should also be eligible to register. Regulatory signals and industry response - Bank of Korea officials have told media they do not see a need to limit transfer services strictly to incumbent VASPs if other firms can deliver the service, though such firms would still be subject to foreign‑exchange registration and reporting duties. - The Bank of Korea is meeting with industry participants to guide them on registration and integration with the FX reporting network. Industry attention is focused on whether the enforcement decree—due before the December rollout—will allow new entrants beyond trading platforms. - Many fintechs have struggled to enter the digital‑asset space because of VASP registration hurdles and difficulties obtaining real‑name banking relationships. A distinct licensing route for virtual‑asset transfers could create fresh opportunities in blockchain remittances and FX services. Next steps The Ministry of Economy and Finance and the Bank of Korea are continuing consultations with industry as they finalize the detailed rules ahead of December. The outcome will shape who can legally operate cross‑border crypto transfer services in South Korea going forward. Broader regulatory context This initiative follows other moves to fold blockchain products into existing financial frameworks. The Ministry has said tokenized stocks could fall under current securities tax rules if the Financial Services Commission (FSC) classifies them as securities. The FSC is expected to publish updated token‑securities guidance in July and continues to develop a roadmap for tokenized versions of conventional assets, including listed equities. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Survey: 1 in 5 Upper-Tier UK SMEs Say Customers Want Crypto Payments
One in five upper-tier UK SMEs say customers want crypto payment options, new survey finds A new whitepaper from payments firm DECTA, shared with crypto.news, reveals rising interest in crypto payments among larger British small and medium-sized enterprises — even as security and simplicity remain merchants’ top priorities. Survey details - 500 UK SME decision-makers surveyed by Censuswide, March 13–20, 2026. - Overall, 11.8% of merchants said customers want the option to pay in cryptocurrency. - That figure jumps to 20.7% among businesses with annual turnover of £50m–£99.99m. Where crypto fits in merchants’ priorities Merchants rank payment factors in this order of importance, with crypto well down the list: - Payment security: 48.6% - Simplicity: 42.2% - Speed: 37.2% Other priorities cited include multiple payment options, refunds, guest checkout and Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL). Cryptocurrency placed eighth overall at 11.8%, while BNPL was a top customer priority for nearly 20% of respondents. DECTA noted open banking and crypto are attracting disproportionate interest from larger firms. “Alternative payment methods continue to gain traction among merchants,” said Scott Dawson, DECTA CEO and chair of the Payments Innovation Forum. DECTA warns that payment providers who ignore crypto risk losing favor with some of their largest merchant clients. Cross-border pain points and priorities The report also highlights the growing importance of international payments: - 53.8% of UK SMEs already sell products and services globally. - 20.2% of merchants involved in global trade said their international payments experience has worsened. Top business payment challenges were slow access to funds (19.4%), fraud and security concerns (16%), and lack of transparency around payment processing fees (14.2%). More than half (51.8%) of surveyed merchants would prioritize security over lower fees and access to the latest payment tech — rising to 62.1% among micro-businesses (1–9 employees). Regulatory backdrop These adoption signals come amid heightened UK regulatory scrutiny of crypto. This month the Financial Conduct Authority warned football clubs about sponsorship deals involving unauthorised crypto firms, and continues to develop a wider crypto framework. Under the FCA’s timetable, crypto firms can apply for authorisation from September 30, 2026, with the full cryptoasset regime set to take effect October 25, 2027. Separately, UK authorities sanctioned Huobi Global S.A. (linked to HTX) in May as part of an enforcement action focused on alleged ties to the A7 network. That followed FCA legal action against HTX over alleged unlawful crypto promotions in the UK. Takeaway Crypto payments remain a minority preference among UK SMEs overall, but the DECTA survey shows meaningful demand among higher-turnover and internationally active merchants. For payment providers and crypto firms, the message is clear: while security and simplicity still rule, offering crypto and other alternative payment rails could be increasingly important to win and retain larger, globally trading clients. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
$2.13B Options Expiry Leaves BTC & ETH Below 'Max Pain' Ahead of June 26
Headline: $2.13B options expiry leaves BTC and ETH trading below “max pain” as markets eye June 26 quarterly settlement A $2.13 billion options expiry for Bitcoin and Ethereum on June 19 closed with both assets trading below their respective max pain levels, underscoring a cautious derivatives market ahead of a much larger quarterly settlement next week. Key facts from the June 19 expiry - Bitcoin: 31,000 options expired; put-call ratio 0.78; notional value ~$1.9 billion; max pain: $65,000. BTC traded around $62,500 during the session — below the max pain level. - Ethereum: 138,000 options expired; put-call ratio 1.03; notional value ~$230 million; max pain: $1,725. ETH traded near $1,690 — also under its max pain point. - Total notional expiry: ~$2.13 billion. What happened and why it matters - Bitcoin briefly ran up toward ~$67,000 earlier in the week, but sellers pushed it back below $63,000 before the expiry. That left the $60,000–$63,000 zone in focus — the same region highlighted after last week’s expiry as concentrated downside exposure. - Options analytics firm GreeksLive flagged the $60,000 strike as a “critical threshold.” Their warning: if BTC sustains a break below that level, dealer hedging could flip from a stabilizing influence to a directionally reinforcing force, potentially accelerating any downside move. - Open interest remains bifurcated: sizeable long-dated upside activity clusters near the $80,000 strike while bearish exposure concentrates near $60,000. That split reflects a market balancing longer-term upside bets against short-term downside protection. Institutional flows, liquidity and volatility - The market has also been coping with institutional selling pressure. Strategy (the company formerly known as MicroStrategy) drew attention after a small Bitcoin sale earlier this month that rattled some traders — though analysts argued ETF outflows and whale selling were larger contributors to the pullback. - Spot Bitcoin ETF demand has cooled during the recent dip, removing a key source of institutional bid that supported prices since the ETFs launched. - Volatility has subsided at the front end. Laevitas said a “week of grinding calm” pushed seven-day at-the-money implied volatility down from roughly 46% to 36%, while longer-dated vols held around 43%. Skew remains negative, indicating persistent demand for downside protection. Near-term levels to watch - Bitcoin: $60,000 is the critical line. Staying above it may keep volatility contained; a sustained breach could trigger faster hedging flows and a move toward lower support. - Ethereum: $1,700–$1,725 is the key area. Failure to reclaim $1,725 would likely keep pressure on the $1,650–$1,600 range. What’s next - This week’s expiry was smaller than the prior week’s, but the quarterly options settlement on June 26 is more significant — about 15% of outstanding positions are set to expire then. Traders managing hedges and positioning ahead of that date will likely keep derivatives-driven flows and volatility in focus. Bottom line: The June 19 expiry didn’t change the broader market trend by itself, but it reinforced that traders are cautious while BTC and ETH trade below their max pain points ahead of a larger quarterly settlement. As usual, direction from the $60k (BTC) and $1.7k (ETH) lines will shape short-term dynamics. Disclosure: This article is for informational purposes only and is not investment advice. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news