Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.35T
Market Cap
$2.35T
24h Trading Volume
$141.09B
BTC Dominance
56.47%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Fidelity Launches Money-Market Fund to Serve Stablecoin Reserves, Not a Token
Fidelity is moving deeper into the plumbing behind stablecoins — not by launching its own token, but by offering a regulated money-market product designed for the reserve needs of token issuers. What Fidelity launched Fidelity Reserves Digital Fund (ticker: FYMXX) is a traditional money market fund built around the kinds of short-term assets stablecoin issuers typically use for reserve backing: US Treasury bills, repurchase agreements (repos), and cash-equivalents. Crucially, FYMXX is a conventional TradFi vehicle, not an on-chain or tokenized fund. Why this matters Stablecoins depend on liquid, high-quality reserves to maintain their dollar peg and meet redemptions. As the stablecoin market grows, the infrastructure that manages those reserves — yield, liquidity, compliance, and operational scale — becomes increasingly valuable. Fidelity is positioning FYMXX to serve that institutional reserve role, offering issuers familiar money-market mechanics and regulatory oversight rather than a blockchain-native alternative. Regulatory timing and positioning Fidelity’s materials explicitly frame FYMXX to align with eligible reserve asset criteria under proposed US legislation such as the GENIUS Act. That signals readiness for a future where stablecoin reserves are subject to clearer, formal rules. But FYMXX is not a one-size-fits-all regulatory fix: laws, reserve rules, and issuer obligations could evolve, and issuers will still need to meet changing compliance requirements. Risk realities acknowledged Fidelity also highlights the key risk: concentration and liquidity pressure. If a large stablecoin suffers a confidence shock, depeg, or a sudden mass redemption, issuers may need to withdraw significant assets quickly. A fund heavily exposed to stablecoin reserve flows could face correlated liquidity stress in such scenarios. In short: scale brings opportunity — and correlated risk. Bigger picture Fidelity’s move underscores how stablecoins are evolving from niche exchange tools into institutional bridges between tokenized payments, Treasury markets, settlement rails, and traditional asset management. If regulation sharpens, more big financial firms may compete to manage reserves — potentially improving transparency and safety, but also concentrating more of crypto’s dollar plumbing inside major TradFi players. What FYMXX signals The fund shows where the stablecoin business is heading: tokens stay on-chain, but the cash-and-Treasury layer behind them is becoming a serious institutional battleground. For issuers, partnering with experienced money-market managers could simplify reserve reporting, liquidity management, and compliance. For the market, it raises questions about systemic concentration and how best to balance robustness with decentralization. This article was written by the News Desk and edited by Samuel Rae. Report based on information from Fidelity Institutional. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Groggy but Not Dead: Cardano Hits Range Low as Traders Pull Back — Leios Testnet Looms
Cardano (ADA) is groggy but not dead — trading near the bottom of its recent range as investors await a possible catalyst. ADA changed hands at $0.1607, down 3.2% in 24 hours, and continues to show deep losses across longer horizons: -6.1% over seven days, -35.6% over a month and -73.2% year‑over‑year. Despite the weakness, daily turnover remains robust at about $368.8 million. Derivatives and on‑chain data point to cautious positioning - The long‑to‑short ratio sits at 0.96, indicating marginally more shorts than longs among leveraged traders. - Futures open interest is roughly $348 million and has been sliding since mid‑May, a sign that speculative engagement is ebbing rather than accelerating. - On‑chain Network Realised Profit/Loss (NPL) has plunged, showing a large share of recent holders are selling at a loss — behavior commonly seen during capitulation episodes. In short, both derivatives and on‑chain measures suggest traders are cutting exposure, not piling in. Technical picture: bearish, but compressing - ADA is trading below the 50-, 100- and 200‑day exponential moving averages, which reinforces resistance on rallies and confirms the prevailing downtrend. - The 14‑day RSI is around 31 — under bearish control but not deeply oversold — suggesting momentum has softened but not flipped bullish. - Analysts have flagged a bearish flag breakdown, a pattern that typically signals continuation of the downtrend after a pause. Catalyst and near‑term scenarios All eyes are on the Leios scaling testnet slated for around June 23, which could spark renewed activity in Cardano if the upgrade delivers promising results. Market structure is weak but showing early signs of compression — reduced selling momentum and oversold readings on higher timeframes suggest ADA could be approaching a decision point. Price scenarios to watch - Bull case: If buyers defend the $0.157 support zone, a short‑term rebound toward $0.172 is the primary recovery target. - Bear case: Losing $0.157 would leave the path open to $0.148 and potentially $0.13, depending on liquidity and trader sentiment. Bottom line Cardano remains in a downtrend, with derivatives and on‑chain signals pointing to lower participation and holders realizing losses. The Leios testnet is the most likely near‑term catalyst to change that trajectory — but until buyers reassert themselves above key resistance levels, downside risk remains meaningful. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Upbit's staggered nine-token listing reshapes Korean liquidity — not all tokens surged
Upbit’s latest listing wave thrust Korean exchange liquidity back into focus — and it wasn’t just the new tickers that mattered, but how the exchange rolled them out. South Korea’s largest crypto venue added nine assets across BTC and USDT markets, according to Upbit’s notices and market reports. The roster included PEAQ, LIT, KMNO, MORPHO, GRAM, LDO, PAXG, OSMO and AMP. Because Korean retail trading is deep and active, an Upbit listing can rapidly reshape a token’s liquidity, visibility and short-term speculative demand — but this round showed that not every new pair behaves the same. What set this rollout apart was Upbit’s staggered trading controls aimed at taming early volatility. Reports described hourly trading windows, an initial limit-order only period, a temporary ban on buy orders at the start of each listing, and restrictions on low-priced sell orders. Those measures are meant to slow the frantic opening minutes when order books are thin and momentum-chasing retail traders can create disorderly price action. Slowing the initial flow doesn’t remove volatility, but it gives markets more structure and time for order books to form. The market response underlined that nuance. PEAQ reportedly posted strong gains after trading opened, while several other newly listed tokens moved modestly or declined. That divergence matters: listings remain catalysts, but they’re not automatic buy signals. Traders are increasingly selective, weighing liquidity, narrative strength, preexisting positions and overall altcoin sentiment before jumping in. Viewed more broadly, the episode is a reminder of how access to a major Korean exchange can quickly change a token’s trading profile — yet the magnitude and durability of those moves depend on fundamentals beyond the headline. In fast-moving alt markets, the first few hours after a listing often reveal which tokens have genuine demand versus those merely riding publicity. One listed asset, PAXG (tokenized gold), illustrates a separate point about collateral and market roles. Tokenized gold doesn’t aim to displace Bitcoin in crypto lending but offers lenders and borrowers an alternative collateral type with a different risk profile: while BTC collateral carries crypto market beta, gold-linked collateral is typically framed around preservation, hedging and liquidity. As borrowers ask for more choice, those distinctions gain practical importance. Written by the News Desk; edited by Samuel Rae. This report is based on information from Upbit. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
CFTC Permanently Bans Celsius Founder Alex Mashinsky from Regulated Markets — No New Fine
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has formally closed its civil enforcement case against Celsius founder Alex Mashinsky, issuing a consent order in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York that permanently bars him from trading in CFTC-regulated markets and from registering with the agency in any capacity. Key points - The SDNY entered a consent order against Mashinsky at the CFTC’s request, permanently banning him from participating in regulated derivatives markets and from any future registration with the agency. - The order resolves the CFTC’s personal civil case against Mashinsky but does not affect other ongoing legal matters tied to Celsius — notably his prior criminal conviction and forfeiture obligations. - The CFTC did not impose a new civil monetary penalty on Mashinsky in this settlement; the agency said the decision reflects his criminal conviction and existing forfeiture commitments. - This action closes the CFTC’s civil enforcement avenue against Mashinsky personally but should not be conflated with criminal prosecutions or other civil claims related to Celsius. Background The CFTC’s original complaint, filed in July 2023, alleged that Celsius and Mashinsky defrauded customers by misstating the platform’s safety, profitability and regulatory standing. Celsius, which promoted itself as a place to earn yield on crypto assets, collapsed in 2022 after a liquidity crisis revealed significant flaws in its business model. For many customers, Celsius became emblematic of the last cycle’s misplaced assurances — bank-like language and yield promises without comparable protections. Why this matters - For Mashinsky: the practical consequence from the CFTC’s side is a permanent ban from regulated derivatives markets and agency registration rather than an additional civil fine. Monetary penalties tied to Mashinsky stem from his criminal case and forfeiture orders. - For regulators and the industry: the action follows a broader enforcement trend in the U.S. targeting yield products, lending services and synthetic exposure. The CFTC, SEC, state regulators and criminal authorities have all scrutinized firms that marketed returns without adequately disclosing risks. - For users and executives: the case reinforces that personal accountability can continue after a company fails. Regulators will pursue bans, penalties, forfeiture and criminal charges where they find misrepresentation of risk or customer protections. Consumers should evaluate yield platforms by their disclosures, liquidity and legal structure — not just headline rates. Though Celsius no longer looms as a market player, its legal fallout continues to shape how regulators and the industry approach crypto lending and yield offerings. The CFTC’s resolution is another reminder that the last cycle’s failures still carry enforcement consequences as the ecosystem pivots to ETFs, stablecoin rules and institutional infrastructure. This report is based on information from the CFTC. Written by the News Desk; edited by Samuel Rae. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Forced liquidations, not credit woes, spark STRC & SATA intraday rout, Strive CEO says
Strive CEO Matt Cole called Wednesday “the most difficult day in the history of Digital Credit” after sharp intraday moves in two of the company’s income-style products, STRC and SATA, which many market participants blamed on forced liquidations from leveraged positions. What happened STRC plunged to as low as $82.50 before recovering, Cole said on X. SATA slid from par into the low $90s—Jeff Walton later posted that SATA hit an intraday low of $92.88 before bouncing back to $97.71. Cole described the episode as a “leverage liquidation event,” not a sign that the underlying credit quality had deteriorated. Why it unfolded that way Cole and other observers say the rout looked driven by margin pressure: investors who borrowed against supposedly stable income assets were forced to sell when prices moved against them, amplifying the drop. That pattern mirrors past episodes in traditional finance, where leverage and thin markets can turn modest moves into steep selloffs. Cole stressed the selling became disconnected from the underlying credit profile and that forced selling—not a credit event—was the culprit. Strive’s response and product details Strive said its dividend reserves remain intact and that the company is not under stress, able to meet obligations. The moves drew attention because both STRC and SATA sit inside a nascent market for preferred-equity-style digital credit—products that tie income distributions to Bitcoin treasury strategies and public-market structures. SATA was listed on Nasdaq as part of Strive’s Bitcoin treasury and digital credit strategy; the offering raised $160 million via a 2 million-share IPO. After the listing, Strive reported holding 7,525 BTC. SATA is described as a variable-rate preferred equity product that aims to grow Bitcoin per share over time, targets a trading range of $99–$101, and carries a 13% annual dividend rate; it moved to business-day dividend payments starting June 16. Market takeaways The episode highlights how quickly income products can move when leverage interacts with relatively thin markets. A drop below par can attract bargain-hunting buyers—Cole said there was strong demand near intraday lows—but it also raises questions about liquidity, market depth, and the risks of borrowing to boost returns. With the digital credit market still small, Cole suggested investors, issuers, and market makers can learn from the day’s stress. What’s next For investors, the immediate test is whether STRC and SATA can hold their recoveries as liquidation pressure eases. If SATA consistently trades near its $99–$101 target, it would support Strive’s stated market goals; continued volatility would keep leverage and liquidity squarely in focus for this emerging corner of the crypto ecosystem. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
$8M 'Wrench Attack': Texas Brothers Plead Guilty to Armed Crypto Robbery
Two Texas brothers have pleaded guilty in a brazen crypto “wrench attack” that netted more than $8 million and left a Minnesota family traumatized. Isiah Angelo Garcia, 25, and Raymond Christian Garcia, 24, both of Waller, Texas, admitted Thursday to one count of interference with commerce by robbery, U.S. prosecutors said. The brothers entered their pleas before U.S. District Judge Ann Montgomery in Minneapolis after traveling from Texas to Minnesota to carry out the plot. According to court documents, on the morning of September 19, 2025 the pair forced their way into a home in Grant, a small city outside Minneapolis, held a man and his family at gunpoint for more than eight hours, zip-tied them, and demanded access to the victim’s cryptocurrency accounts. At one point Isiah Garcia forced the victim to drive to the family’s remote cabin in northern Minnesota to retrieve additional crypto storage devices and move funds. In total the brothers coerced transfers exceeding $8 million before fleeing when the family’s son was able to call 911. Investigators identified the suspects using items left behind at the scene, tracked them to the Houston area, and arrested them. Both men admitted to using firearms to threaten the family. FBI Minneapolis Special Agent in Charge Christopher Dotson said, “No one should ever feel unsafe in their own home,” and pledged aggressive investigation of such acts. U.S. Attorney Daniel Rosen said the guilty pleas show a commitment to holding the brothers “accountable for the choices they made.” Each defendant faces up to 20 years in federal prison and has agreed to pay more than $8 million in restitution. Sentencing dates have not been set. The brothers were initially charged in September, shortly after the attack, which rattled the Grant community and prompted a local high school to cancel a homecoming football game while police searched for suspects. The case is part of a growing global wave of “wrench attacks,” in which crypto holders are physically coerced into surrendering access to their assets. Prosecutors and security experts say reported incidents are likely only a fraction of actual cases. High-profile U.S. prosecutions have already produced stiff penalties—last year Remy St. Felix was sentenced to 47 years after leading a violent home-invasion crypto ring—and more indictments are ongoing, including a May case alleging a $6.5 million wrench-attack spree in California. Europe has also seen disturbing episodes; French authorities have charged dozens in kidnapping rings that targeted crypto entrepreneurs, including the attack on Ledger co-founder David Balland. Security experts reiterate the same practical advice: keep crypto holdings out of public view, limit the number of people who know about large holdings, and secure private keys and hardware wallets offline. The plea in this case underscores how real-world violence and organized crime increasingly intersect with digital-asset custody. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news