Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.55T
Market Cap
$2.55T
24h Trading Volume
$72.96B
BTC Dominance
56.92%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
AI Agents Quietly Dominate Prediction Markets, Squeezing Retail Traders
AI agents are quietly reshaping prediction-market trading — and retail traders are already feeling the pressure. Valory AG, the team behind the crypto-AI infrastructure Olas (formerly Autonolas), says autonomous agents are becoming a powerful force in forecasting and trading on prediction markets. David Minarsch, Valory’s CEO and co-founder, describes Olas as plumbing for an emerging “agent economy”: a decentralized ecosystem where autonomous software agents run services on blockchains, interact with smart contracts, cooperate, and earn crypto rewards for users. A live test of that vision arrived in February 2026 with Polystrat, an autonomous agent deployed on Polymarket. Polystrat trades 24/7 on behalf of self-custodying users, executing strategies continuously so human owners aren’t sidelined by sleep, distraction or inconsistent decision-making. “In a nutshell, Polystrat is an autonomous AI agent that trades on Polymarket 24/7 on behalf of its human user,” Minarsch says. Why this matters Prediction markets — platforms that let traders buy and sell contracts tied to real-world outcomes — have exploded from niche forecasting tools into a sizable corner of fintech. The sector’s breakout came during the 2024 U.S. presidential election, and by 2025 total notional trading across major platforms topped $44 billion, with monthly peaks near $13 billion. Trading is concentrated: Kalshi (a U.S.-regulated exchange overseen by the CFTC) and crypto-native Polymarket account for roughly 85–97% of activity. Against that backdrop, a simple insight has driven the shift toward automation: the predictive power of modern AI hasn’t been fully applied to markets. Valory began building a “prediction market economy” on Olas in 2023 to change that — connecting agents to data pipelines and prediction tools to forecast outcomes and trade them. Machines, not emotions Minarsch notes off-the-shelf language models prompted on markets typically perform no better than a coin flip. But when state-of-the-art models are embedded in custom workflows — what Valory calls prediction tools — they can achieve substantially higher accuracy. The firm claims these workflows have historically shown predictive accuracy up to 70% or more. Market data point to a machine advantage: only about 7–13% of human traders reportedly generate positive returns on prediction markets, while early signs of machine participation are rising fast. Analytics platform LayerHub finds more than 30% of wallets on Polymarket are already using AI agents. The results from Polystrat are eye-catching. Within roughly a month of launching, it executed over 4,200 trades on Polymarket, recording individual-trade returns as high as 376%. According to Valory, more than 37% of Polystrat agents posted positive P&L — “less than half that number” of human participants reportedly post gains. Leveling the playing field — and expanding markets Olas aims to democratize access to these agents so retail users aren’t outcompeted by institutional automation. Users can configure agents for strategy preferences, data sources and risk tolerance. Minarsch highlights another opportunity: the long tail of niche markets that humans often ignore. “You just point the agent at the problem and it does the work,” he says, which could unlock forecasting on localized or specialized questions and turn prediction markets into richer data sources for businesses and policymakers. Agents could also be augmented with proprietary datasets, allowing users to encode their own knowledge bases into trading strategies — potentially creating stronger, more principled performance than humans can sustain manually. Ethics, regulation and detection The rise of AI-driven markets raises thorny questions. Critics warn that markets on sensitive topics — wars, deaths or disasters — could incentivize manipulation or moral hazards. Minarsch concedes regulation will be needed to define what markets should exist, but he also argues agents could help policing efforts: automated systems can spot suspicious patterns and flag problematic markets. A user-owned future For Valory, the larger mission is political as much as technical: to ensure everyday users keep a stake in an automated digital economy. “Olas aims to create a world where human users can be empowered through their AI agents rather than disenfranchised by them,” Minarsch says. The project emphasizes user-owned agents so people can deploy autonomous software that generates value on their behalf — with prediction markets serving as an early proving ground. If that model succeeds, autonomous agents may become routine tools for forecasting, trading and decision-support across industries — and the next battleground for who controls value in a machine-driven economy. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Florida's Stablecoin Rules Would Require $10K Reporting, Testing DeSantis' Anti‑CBDC Stance
Florida’s push to regulate stablecoins is testing the limits of a campaign built around opposing “Big Brother” financial surveillance. Governor Ron DeSantis, who in 2023 warned that a central bank digital currency (CBDC) could let Washington police Americans’ daily purchases, may soon sign a bill that hands Florida new authority over privately issued digital dollars. The state Senate unanimously approved Bill 314 on March 6, creating a framework for stablecoin issuers that would, among other measures, require firms to record transactions above $10,000—echoing existing anti-money-laundering (AML) rules. That requirement is at the heart of the political tension. DeSantis once championed a law banning a “centralized digital dollar” in Florida and has repeatedly warned of CBDC-driven surveillance. But Bill 314, by expanding state oversight and data-reporting obligations for stablecoins, resembles some of the monitoring tools critics say a CBDC could enable. DeSantis has not yet seen the bill in final form; his office told Decrypt it could not comment on potential conflicts, and he has not said whether he will sign it. Sponsors say the timing was urgent. State Senator Colleen Burton, who carried the bill, told Decrypt lawmakers moved quickly to prepare for a July deadline when states can apply to supervise certain stablecoins independently. A green light on Bill 314 would position Florida’s Office of Financial Regulation (OFR) as the state’s primary stablecoin regulator, with power to revoke licenses over compliance, reporting, or criminal issues. The new rules are part of a broader regulatory push that mirrors elements of the federal GENIUS Act, a bill states are already aligning with. That alignment has stirred debate among libertarian policy circles: Nicholas Anthony of the Cato Institute told Decrypt it’s “much harder to square” DeSantis’ anti-CBDC rhetoric with a law that hands regulators more levers to monitor and control digital-asset flows. “CBDCs create a lot of problems with financial surveillance and control, but they don’t invent the problems out of thin air,” Anthony added, noting that non-CBDC tools already enable similar supervision. It’s important to draw the distinction between stablecoins and CBDCs. Stablecoins are privately issued tokens—examples include Circle’s USDC—typically backed by cash and Treasuries and circulating on public blockchains like Ethereum. CBDCs would be sovereign digital currency issued by a central bank and backed by the full faith and credit of the government. Still, the practical mechanics of enforcement can overlap: while many crypto wallets are self-custodial, companies such as Circle have previously used blacklists to freeze tokens and have cooperated with law enforcement to block bad actors. The state move comes as federal lawmakers continue wrestling with CBDC policy. The U.S. Senate recently passed a housing bill that would ban a CBDC until 2030 if President Donald Trump signs it—though that path is uncertain and some lawmakers, including Sen. Ted Cruz, argue a temporary pause isn’t enough. House Republican figures such as Tom Emmer have also pushed legislation to outlaw CBDCs outright. On the right, former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene has claimed the GENIUS Act could open a backdoor to a CBDC—an assertion that has fueled broader suspicions about federal legislation touching digital money. What’s next: Florida could submit its application to the federal government this summer and, if accepted, the OFR would take on enforcement duties. Decrypt reached out to the OFR and Senator Burton for further comment. For now, the episode underscores a paradox in U.S. crypto politics: fierce public opposition to a centralized digital dollar coexists with state and private mechanisms that can produce similar surveillance and control effects—raising fresh questions about where the line between privacy and regulation should be drawn. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
AGI Explained: What It Is and Why Crypto Markets Should Brace for Its Impact
What Is AGI? The Elusive AI Prize Everyone Talks About — and Why Crypto Should Care Artificial general intelligence — AGI — is one of the most hyped and contested ideas in tech today. CEOs cite it, investors pour billions into research aimed at it, and ethicists warn of its risks. Yet after decades of debate, there’s still no consensus on what AGI actually is, when it might arrive, or how we’d recognize it. At its broadest, AGI is meant to describe an AI that can understand, learn, and apply knowledge across many different tasks at a human-like level — not just excel at one narrow function. That was the original ambition of AI research dating back to the 1950s, and the term “artificial general intelligence” was popularized in the 2000s to distinguish that ambition from the many specialized systems that dominate labs today. Confusion and competing definitions “There’s a bunch of different definitions,” Malo Bourgon, CEO of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute, told Decrypt. That ambiguity fuels contrasting takes from prominent figures. OpenAI’s Sam Altman, Anthropic’s Dario Amodei and xAI’s Elon Musk have all weighed in publicly. Musk told an XPRIZE interviewer in December, “I think we’ll hit AGI in 2026,” and added, “I'm confident by 2030, AI will exceed the intelligence of all humans combined.” But not everyone accepts that timeline or even the label. A major divide hinges on autonomy. Many current systems — Gemini, ChatGPT, Grok, Claude and others — can generate essays, images, code, and complex answers, prompting some observers to declare “AGI is here.” Critics say these systems are powerful tools but not truly agentic. “Inherent in most people’s definitions of AGI is the sense of autonomy,” Bourgon said. In other words, AGI is often imagined as an agent that can plan and act across varied environments with significant independence — not a chatbot that responds to prompts. Learning vs. memorizing Ben Goertzel, CEO of SingularityNET and one of the early proponents of AGI as a concept, argues the media and some executives have muddled the term. Today’s large models “get there not by learning to do all of it,” he said, “they get there by having the whole internet crammed into their knowledge base.” That difference matters: a true general intelligence would generalize, invent genuinely new ideas, and produce insights beyond remixing its training data. Goertzel gives a simple example: a system trained on music through 1900 wouldn’t spontaneously invent hip hop or grindcore. Gradual transition, not a single switch Many researchers expect any move toward AGI to be gradual and messy rather than a single unmistakable “breakpoint.” “There doesn’t have to be a completely crisp boundary between AGI and pre‑AGI,” Goertzel said, likening the fuzziness to biological edge cases such as viruses. We can recognize clear examples (a living dog versus a rock), but borderline cases may be ambiguous. Different visions and global perspectives The AGI debate spans extremes. Some imagine recursive self‑improvement and an intelligence explosion; others foresee a more mundane outcome — AI that can do most human tasks and becomes a pervasive technology like the internet. The conversation also differs across nations. Kyle Chan, a Brookings researcher, told Decrypt that Chinese AI actors tend to focus less on AGI as an abstract endgame and more on commercial and hardware advantages: “Most people are focused on trying to make money on this thing… especially on the physical side,” he said, pointing to robotics and autonomous systems where China’s hardware supply chains are an edge. Still, Chan notes AGI is on the radar for some Chinese founders. Why this matters for crypto Crypto stakeholders have particular reasons to track AGI debates. Capital flows into AGI research influence investor sentiment across technology markets, including blockchain projects. More capable and autonomous AI agents could transform algorithmic trading, on-chain bot activity, smart-contract auditing, and security threat modeling — both boosting efficiency and introducing new attack vectors. As with any powerful tech, the practical effects and governance choices will likely matter more than the label itself. What to watch Rather than quibbling over definitions, many experts say the useful question is practical: what can these systems do, and what effects will they have? “What are the effects and the capabilities of these systems?” Bourgon said. “That’s more the frame of mind we want to be in now.” In short: AGI remains a contested and evolving concept. Headlines will keep racing ahead of consensus, and the stakes — technological, economic and geopolitical — mean the debate will only intensify. For crypto markets and projects, the safe bet is to follow capabilities and outcomes, not just predictions. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
On-Chain MVRV Signals Possible Final Bitcoin "Shakeout" Near $70K
Bitcoin is stuck below a $74,000 ceiling and drifting around the psychologically important $70,000 mark, with little clear momentum to drive a decisive breakout. While some market participants hope this band will act as a springboard, a fresh on-chain read suggests the market could still see one more washout before a sustained uptrend begins. On March 14, analyst Ali Martinez posted an on-chain take on X highlighting the Bitcoin MVRV Z-Score as a potential signal for a local bottom. The MVRV Z-Score compares market value to realized value to identify whether BTC is over- or undervalued relative to holders’ average cost basis. When the metric slips into negative territory, it typically means prices are below many holders’ purchase prices — a classic environment for capitulation. Martinez pointed to a specific historical level: a Z-Score reading of about -0.262. That reading appeared at cycle lows in 2015, 2019 and 2022 — each time preceding a decisive rebound and the start of a sustained bullish phase. If history repeats, reaching that level again could mark a compelling accumulation window. That said, the signal is not imminent. The current MVRV Z-Score sits near 0.469, meaning there’s room for the metric — and likely prices — to move lower before hitting the -0.262 threshold. And even if the Z-Score does reach that historic marker, past cycles show it didn’t trigger instant rallies; prices often spent weeks or months consolidating before a major leg up. In short: the on-chain evidence leaves open the possibility of a “final shake-off” to clear weak hands, but timing and duration remain uncertain. Traders should expect potential choppy price action and allow for extended base-building before declaring a trend reversal. Market snapshot: BTC is trading around $71,480, up just over 1% in the past 24 hours and more than 6% on the week, per CoinGecko. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Bitcoin Hits $71K Amid Strait of Hormuz Shock Risk — Watch OI & Funding Rates
Bitcoin has regained some footing after a volatile start to the year. The top cryptocurrency rebounded from a local trough of roughly $60,000 in early February and is trading near $71,000 — a roughly 7.2% gain over the past month (press time price: $71,639). The rally comes amid intensifying geopolitical turmoil in the Middle East. According to reports, after a coordinated US–Israel strike on Iran, Tehran has moved to close the Strait of Hormuz — a chokepoint that handles about 20% of global oil flows. The closure raises the prospect of a meaningful disruption to global energy supplies. In a QuickTake on CryptoQuant, XWIN Research Japan warns that a prolonged stoppage of traffic through the strait could trigger an energy shock. With few viable alternatives for the same shipping capacity, continued cuts to shipping activity would likely push oil and gas prices higher, feeding broader inflation given how central petroleum products are to modern economies. That inflationary pressure tends to provoke tighter monetary policy. Central banks commonly respond to energy-driven inflation by hiking rates to cool activity, which can drive investors toward yield-bearing fiat assets (notably the US dollar) and away from volatile risk assets. XWIN’s analysis suggests Bitcoin behaves like a risk asset during geopolitical stress, so an initial wave of BTC outflows would be likely if the Strait remains closed. However, the firm emphasizes that the market impact will depend more on the financial ecosystem’s response than the energy shock alone. Key drivers will be global liquidity conditions, central-bank policy moves, and overall market leverage. Traders and investors should watch derivatives metrics closely: rising Open Interest alongside extreme funding rates can indicate crowded positions and a fragile market structure prone to sharp corrections if a shock hits. Bottom line: Bitcoin has climbed back above $70k, but renewed geopolitical risk and the potential for policy-driven market flows mean volatility could increase. Keep a close eye on OI and funding rates for signals of positioning stress while policymakers react to any sustained energy disruption. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
SEC and CFTC Sign Memo to Harmonize Crypto Oversight — Industry Awaits Formal Rules
Headline: SEC and CFTC sign memo to harmonize crypto oversight — industry still waits for formal rules The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission took a major step last week toward ending years of regulatory uncertainty for crypto firms: the two agencies signed a memorandum of understanding to coordinate how they’ll oversee digital assets and related technologies. The deal formalizes closer cooperation — regular joint meetings, data sharing and coordinated communications — and signals both agencies intend to align on how they define and regulate digital assets. That’s a notable shift from the public turf battles of the past and a welcome sign for companies that have long sought clearer cross-agency guidance. What the memorandum says - Joint rulemaking and guidance: The agencies committed to clarifying product definitions through joint interpretations and rulemakings, aiming to reduce conflicting classifications of digital assets as securities or commodities. - Coordinated responses to market participants: The SEC and CFTC said they’ll coordinate how they address firms’ requests for interpretive guidance or exemptive relief, rather than issuing conflicting directives. - Regulatory framework updates: The memo lists areas for harmonized updates, including clearing and margin rules, trade data standards and intermediary oversight. - Ongoing collaboration: The agencies pledged regular meetings and shared data to maintain alignment in overseeing the digital-asset ecosystem. “More than aligning our rules, a harmonized framework also demands coordinating our responses to the firms that operate within it, including those that have questions of interpretation or request exemptive relief,” SEC Chair Paul Atkins said in prepared remarks. Why it matters For crypto firms, harmonized agency action could reduce legal and operational risk. Joint interpretations would make it easier to know whether a token is treated as a security or a commodity, and coordinated approaches to clearing, margin and intermediaries could streamline compliance for exchanges, custodians and derivatives platforms. The memo may even signal institutional consolidation: Bloomberg reported the agencies are considering co-locating in the SEC’s building, underscoring the push for closer day-to-day collaboration. What still remains unresolved Despite the memo’s promise, the industry is still waiting for concrete rulemaking and proposed rules. The agencies’ statements are a preparatory step, not the final legal framework. The broader congressional picture also complicates timing. A market-structure bill that could affect digital-asset markets is moving through the Senate, but Senate Majority Leader John Thune told Punchbowl News he didn’t expect the bill to clear the chamber before “the April time period.” With Congress heading into a two-week Easter recess and other priorities — like negotiations over DHS funding and the White House’s push for the SAVE Act — legislative movement on market structure could be delayed further. Bottom line The SEC–CFTC memorandum is a significant signal that federal regulators want to present a unified approach to crypto. It promises clearer definitions and coordinated oversight, which could reduce fragmentation and legal uncertainty. But the industry will need to wait for the formal rulemaking and for Congress to resolve competing legislative priorities before the full impact is clear. This article is adapted from CoinDesk’s State of Crypto newsletter. For updates and more coverage of regulatory developments, follow our reporting. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news