Cryptocurrency Prices, Charts & Market Capitalizations

39 minutes ago

AllUnity Launches SEKAU - a MiCA-Compliant SEK Stablecoin for Institutional Settlement

AllUnity has launched SEKAU, a Swedish krona–backed stablecoin aimed at institutional settlement and digital payments under the EU’s new Markets in Crypto‑Assets (MiCA) rules. The move expands Europe’s regulated stablecoin landscape beyond dollar- and euro‑centric offerings and marks a notable step in the continent’s push toward currency‑specific, compliant digital money. What SEKAU is - SEKAU is marketed as a fully reserved e‑money token (EMT) backed 1:1 by Swedish krona reserves and redeemable at par for holders. - The token is issued by AllUnity, a regulated European stablecoin issuer backed by institutional investors and market players including DWS, Flow Traders and Galaxy. - AllUnity had earlier said it intended to launch the world’s first fully reserved, MiCA‑compliant SEK stablecoin. Why it matters - MiCA gives e‑money tokens a clearer regulatory framework in Europe—setting rules on reserves, disclosures, redemption rights and issuer obligations. That framework doesn’t eliminate risk, but it creates a legal perimeter that many institutions prefer over the previously fragmented European landscape. - Most stablecoin liquidity today remains concentrated in dollar‑pegged tokens, reflecting the dollar’s global role. SEKAU addresses a different need: a local‑currency rail for settlement, treasury operations and payments within a regulated European structure. - For banks, fintechs and corporates the attraction is operational — not speculative. A regulated SEK token can enable settlement outside traditional banking hours, support programmable payments, and reduce friction in cross‑border or platform-based flows. Why Sweden could benefit - Sweden already has deep digital payments adoption. A regulated SEK token gives institutions a way to pilot blockchain settlement and programmable flows without relying solely on dollar or euro rails, and while operating inside a familiar legal regime. Market implications - SEKAU is part of a broader shift in stablecoin competition. The early market focused on dollar liquidity and crypto trading; the next phase is increasingly about regulated payment rails, corporate treasury use, cross‑border settlement and local fiat integration. - That shift favors issuers who can pair regulatory permissions with real banking relationships, reserves and market‑making infrastructure — a combination AllUnity argues it can deliver given its ownership and partners. The hard part: adoption - Launching a regulated token is only the first step. Real-world success requires liquidity, exchange listings, market‑maker support, integrations with payment and treasury systems, and enterprise uptake. SEKAU’s long‑term utility will depend on whether institutions actually need and use a regulated SEK rail at scale. Bottom line SEKAU underlines a clear trend: Europe’s stablecoin market is moving beyond generic crypto trading pairs toward regulated, currency‑specific digital money infrastructure. Whether SEKAU becomes a widely used SEK settlement rail will depend on market adoption, but the product demonstrates how MiCA is enabling new, non‑dollar stablecoin offerings in Europe. Source: AllUnity’s official communications and launch announcement on X. Written by the News Desk; edited by Samuel Rae. Originally published by AllUnity. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

39 minutes ago

CME Sues CFTC Over Crypto Perpetuals, Accused of Protecting 92% Derivatives Monopoly

CME Group is under fire from crypto policy advocates who say the exchange is using the courts to protect a near-monopoly in U.S. derivatives markets. Jake Chervinsky, CEO of the Hyperliquid Policy Center, slammed CME this week after the exchange sued the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and its chairman, Michael Selig, over the regulator’s recent approval of regulated crypto perpetual futures. In a June 19 post on X, Chervinsky called the lawsuit a “shocking miscalculation” and accused CME of revealing itself as “a petty incumbent monopolist afraid of competition.” Hyperliquid’s criticism—made in a June 18 post that cites Better Markets data—spotlights just how dominant CME is: roughly 92% of U.S. exchange-traded derivatives volume, the post says. “When one venue holds that much volume, everyone else carries the cost. Less choice, higher prices,” the group wrote, arguing that years of U.S. traders being forced offshore to access perpetual-style products ended only after regulators recently opened a compliant domestic pathway. What triggered the legal fight The lawsuit challenges the CFTC’s decision to allow regulated crypto perpetual futures on U.S. platforms such as Coinbase and Kalshi, a move that has already produced more than $1 billion in trading volume, according to earlier reporting. CME contends that those perpetual contracts were mischaracterized by the agency—arguing they should be regulated as swaps under the Dodd-Frank Act’s Title VII framework, not as conventional futures. In public comments and court filings, CME said the CFTC departed from established treatment of similar instruments and approved a new product type without going through formal rulemaking. CME’s outgoing CEO Terrence Duffy told CNBC this week the exchange planned legal action after the approvals, reiterating the swap-versus-futures argument. Why it matters for markets and regulators Hyperliquid and Chervinsky frame the lawsuit as an incumbent pushing back against competition just as a genuinely new derivatives product—perpetual futures—enters regulated U.S. markets for the first time in over a decade. The group also quoted CFTC Chair Michael Selig’s recent remark that “vested interests always fear the future,” using it to argue that legacy firms often resist new entrants. The dispute comes as regulators themselves revisit the classificatory rules at issue. The CFTC and the Securities and Exchange Commission have launched a joint public consultation asking for input on how swaps, security-based swaps, mixed swaps and other modern derivatives should be treated under Dodd-Frank. The agencies say the review could clear “longstanding ambiguities”; SEC Chairman Paul Atkins has said clarification is overdue. The consultation will be open for public comment for 60 days after it appears in the Federal Register. Bottom line: the clash pits a dominant exchange defending its legal reading of Dodd-Frank against crypto firms and advocates who say opening a regulated path to perpetuals breaks a long-standing reliance on offshore venues—and could finally bring more competition and choice to U.S. derivatives markets. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

3 hours ago

Amazon Backs Out of Sam Altman Biopic as OpenAI Nears IPO — Crypto Implications

Amazon has quietly backed out of distributing the Sam Altman biopic Artificial — a move that comes as OpenAI ramps up preparations for a possible public listing and deepens its commercial ties with major tech partners. What happened - Puck reports Amazon has withdrawn from the high-profile film project but continues talks with the filmmakers to help find a new distributor. - The biopic, which centers on OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and also features Elon Musk, reportedly doesn’t portray either executive entirely sympathetically — a detail some observers say may have influenced Amazon’s choice. - Sources say Amazon praised the director’s vision but ultimately decided not to move forward as the film’s distributor. Why it matters - The timing is notable: Amazon has been strengthening its business relationship with OpenAI, including a multi-billion-dollar investment commitment tied to future milestones and a major cloud computing agreement signed last year. - While Amazon has not publicly tied its film decision to its OpenAI partnership, industry chatter in Hollywood and Silicon Valley is inevitable given the overlap and the stakes involved. OpenAI’s broader context - The film news arrives as OpenAI lays groundwork for a potential IPO. The company reportedly filed a confidential draft registration statement with U.S. regulators, a move that preserves optionality — allowing it to go public quickly when market conditions are right, or delay if staying private is advantageous. - Sam Altman has told employees an IPO could happen within the next year, but emphasized the timeline remains flexible. Commercial momentum - Investor interest in OpenAI has intensified as AI companies draw larger capital flows and higher public valuations. Recent enterprise deals underline the company’s commercial traction. - Notably, OpenAI signed a multi-year agreement with Spanish bank BBVA to expand ChatGPT Enterprise from 11,000 users to the bank’s entire 120,000-employee workforce across 25 countries. OpenAI says the rollout — covering customer service, risk analysis, software development and internal operations — ranks among the largest generative AI deployments in financial services and will involve close collaboration with OpenAI’s product, research and technology teams. Bottom line for crypto and markets Amazon’s decision to step away from Artificial adds a cultural and reputational subplot to the larger story around OpenAI’s business expansion and potential public debut. As enterprise contracts and investor interest grow, scrutiny of OpenAI’s leadership and strategy will only intensify — a dynamic worth watching for market participants tracking AI-driven value creation across tech and financial ecosystems. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

3 hours ago

Congress Moves to Bar Lawmakers and Families From Betting on Crypto Prediction Markets

Rep. Bryan Steil (R‑Wis.) on Thursday introduced new legislation aimed at cutting off a potential insider‑trading channel for lawmakers: the Stop Lawmakers from Predicting Act would bar members of Congress — as well as their spouses and dependent children — from placing wagers on prediction markets tied to legislation, government actions, or election outcomes. Steil, who chairs the House Administration Committee, framed the bill as a trust‑restoration measure. "The American people deserve to know their Member of Congress is not profiting off insider information," he said. "The Stop Lawmakers from Predicting Act ensures that cannot happen. This legislation is critical to restoring the public's trust in their elected officials. Lawmakers should be writing policy, not wagering on its outcome." Key provisions and penalties - Covered persons: members of Congress, spouses, and dependent children. - Prohibited activity: placing bets on prediction markets about legislation, government actions, or elections. - Penalties: violators would owe the greater of $2,000 or 10% of the wager, plus any profits from the bet. - Enforcement limits: fines could not be paid with official office funds, taxpayer allowances, or campaign donations; unpaid fines upon leaving office could be referred to the Justice Department for civil enforcement. Where this fits into broader reform efforts Steil’s bill builds on the Stop Insider Trading Act advanced by his committee in January and complements a broader congressional effort to limit financial conflicts of interest among lawmakers. He has previously signaled intent to fold similar restrictions into a wider ban on congressional stock trading — a bill that cleared committee in February but has since stalled, though Steil said he hoped for a House vote this summer. Why crypto and prediction‑market platforms are in the crosshairs The bill arrives amid rising bipartisan concern about members of Congress and government employees using commercial prediction platforms such as Kalshi and Polymarket to bet on political events — including contests in which they have a direct stake. The Senate passed a resolution in April barring its members and staff from using prediction markets, and in May the House Oversight Committee opened investigations into Kalshi and Polymarket over alleged patterns of insider trading. The legislative activity follows a high‑profile criminal case tied to prediction‑market wagers: in April, Army Master Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke was arrested and accused of using classified information to place Polymarket bets related to the January removal of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, reportedly netting more than $400,000. Van Dyke has pleaded not guilty; his trial is set for December. Potential implications for crypto markets For crypto-native prediction platforms like Polymarket — and regulated players such as Kalshi — the bill signals continued scrutiny from Washington. If enacted, the law would not ban private citizens from trading on these sites, but it would cut one potential source of politically linked liquidity and could spur platforms to tighten compliance measures for accounts with government ties. It also increases the legislative momentum toward broader trading restrictions on elected officials. Next steps The Stop Lawmakers from Predicting Act has been introduced; its fate will depend on committee consideration and floor action. It joins a suite of proposals and inquiries that together mark a shift toward more aggressive oversight of how political information can be monetized on prediction markets — especially those operating in or adjacent to the crypto ecosystem. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

4 hours ago

EU's €10K cash cap sparks privacy-coin debate — Zcash takes center stage

Headline: Europe’s compliance debate pushes privacy coins back into the spotlight — Zcash tops the conversation Europe’s push to tighten anti-money-laundering rules and limit cash to €10,000 has reignited debate over financial privacy — and Zcash (ZEC) is one of the biggest beneficiaries of the renewed attention. What sparked it Draft EU measures, due to take effect in 2027, include a €10,000 cap on cash payments and tougher AML requirements. Early reads of the proposals led some commentators to claim every Bitcoin transaction would require identity checks, a view that quickly set off a broader conversation about on-chain privacy. Subsequent analysis clarified that the rules primarily target regulated crypto service providers rather than peer-to-peer transfers, but concerns about erosion of financial privacy still became a hot topic among traders and analysts. Why Zcash is trending Helius CEO Mert drove much of the chatter by naming Zcash as a leading privacy-focused network, and posts from high-visibility accounts like WallStreetBets framed a potential “privacy era” for crypto. Unlike Bitcoin’s fully public ledger, Zcash supports optional shielded transactions that hide wallet addresses and transfer details — a feature advocates say could gain appeal if compliance rules tighten further. Market reaction and price action That narrative, however, hasn’t produced an immediate price surge. ZEC was trading near $451 at reporting, and daily volume dropped about 29% to roughly $365 million. The token’s muted response follows a violent sell-off earlier this month when ZEC plunged more than 40% in a single day amid heavy selling reportedly linked in part to large-holder activity and sales tied to BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes. Technical outlook Technical analysts remain split on what comes next. Popular analyst Altcoin Sherpa called the current zone a support region and said he’s still bullish long-term, forecasting ZEC may chop inside a broad $350–$500 range while largely tracking Bitcoin’s moves. Another analyst, Ardi, flagged $440 as a critical level: staying above it and forming a higher low could set the stage for another breakout after ZEC’s prior run to about $520; a drop below $440 would, he said, likely confirm a macro lower-high and open the door to further downside. Bottom line The EU compliance debate has refocused attention on privacy coins, with Zcash emerging as a high-profile candidate if regulatory pressure raises demand for on-chain privacy. For now, however, the market is watching whether renewed interest will translate into stronger price action or if ZEC will remain range-bound while digesting recent volatility. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

4 hours ago

Axelar Cuts Secret Network Bridge After $4.67M IBC Exploit; Core Protocol Intact

Axelar has cut off its bridge connections to Secret Network after a security incident that saw roughly $4.67 million in bridged tokens stolen. What happened - The exploit targeted assets moved from the Axelar chain into Secret Network via the Cosmos Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) framework. Early investigation points to a problem in the Secret-side ICS-20 smart contract that handles these IBC transfers — not a failure in Axelar’s core infrastructure. - In response, Axelar’s emergency committee disabled the Secret and Secret-SNIP connections to stop further outflows and said it has alerted relevant exchanges and law enforcement while the probe continues. - Axelar also stressed that its core protocol stayed online during the incident and that, based on current findings, other IBC channels, Secret-native assets, and additional Axelar integrations do not appear to be affected. Why this matters - Secret Network is a privacy-focused blockchain that encrypts transaction data while keeping smart contract code verifiable on-chain. Through Axelar’s integration, developers have been able to build private cross-chain use cases — confidential DeFi, private NFT transfers, and anonymous governance — which are now at least temporarily curtailed for assets bridged from Axelar. - With the bridge routes disabled, developers and users relying on Axelar-to-Secret transfers will be blocked until engineers finish reviewing the attack path and quantify the full extent of losses. Next steps - Axelar expects to publish a full post-mortem when the investigation concludes. For now, affected routes remain offline as teams dig into the vulnerability and recovery options. Wider context - The incident is the latest in a run of hacks and security events that have shaken infrastructure projects and protocols. Earlier this month Humanity Protocol dealt with a June 8 exploit that prompted replacement H tokens via an audited ERC-20 airdrop after stolen credentials — not contract bugs — were blamed. Crypto payments platform Pyra also announced plans to wind down after the Drift exploit left it unable to recover. - Research from Binance Research highlighted the broader impact on the sector: DeFi exploits in April contributed to around $13 billion in TVL outflows, and on-chain leverage rose as liquidity contracted. Axelar says it will provide more details as its investigation progresses. For now, the focus is containment and forensic analysis to prevent similar cross-chain losses. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news

#	Name	Price	1h %	24h %	7d %	Market Cap	Volume (24h)	Chart (7d)

No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query

Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps

Latest Crypto News