Today's Cryptocurrency Prices by Market Caps
The global cryptocurrency market cap today i $2.63T
Market Cap
$2.63T
24h Trading Volume
$149.72B
BTC Dominance
56.69%
|
#
|
Name
|
Price
|
1h %
|
24h %
|
7d %
|
Market Cap
|
Volume (24h)
|
Chart (7d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
—
|
|||||||
|
No cryptocurrencies found Try adjusting your search query |
||||||||
Latest Crypto News
View All News
Hoskinson Urges Liqwid Insiders to Recuse, Let Holders Vote to Honor Return Pledge
Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson has waded into a heated governance fight at Liqwid, urging protocol insiders to step back and let token holders decide whether prior public promises should be honored. His intervention spotlights a recurring weak point in DeFi governance: whether votes are legitimate when founding teams or core contributors stand to benefit directly. Speaking from Wyoming during a livestream, Hoskinson said he normally steers clear of DeFi disputes on Cardano unless the community broadly requests his input. But he called the Liqwid episode a serious trust issue after October assurances that “100% of the assets in the smart contracts” tied to the protocol would be returned to their “rightful owners.” At the center of the dispute is a sizable allocation of Midnight’s NIGHT tokens associated with Liqwid’s ADA market. Governance materials show about 18.81 million NIGHT were allocated — roughly a seven-figure position, currently worth just under $1 million — which helps explain why this is more than a symbolic governance quarrel: users say those tokens were supposed to be fully returned. Hoskinson said the problem partly arose from an internal governance and legal snag: the team, he claims, lacked the authorization under their DAO’s user agreement to carry out the allocation. Even if that’s true, he added, the bigger concern is how the situation was handled afterward. His remedy is simple and surgical: rerun the vote with clearer terms and a firewall between insiders and the decision. “If you have to go to the DAO for a vote, two things should be done,” he said: insiders who would directly benefit must recuse themselves, and the vote should be a straightforward yes-or-no on whether to honor the October marketing commitments. That framing hits at the heart of his critique. Hoskinson argues people deposited funds into the relevant smart contracts on the explicit understanding that prior commitments would be honored. “Commitments were already made, people put money into the contracts understanding those terms and conditions and had no reasons to believe that such things would be violated,” he said, adding that those entrusted with the software and the protocol should have acted more responsibly. He repeatedly emphasized legitimacy over mere procedure: DAOs don’t gain credibility just because they run votes, he said — legitimacy comes from broad participation and confidence that outcomes aren’t being driven by a small cluster of insiders. If holders believe votes are controlled by insiders, there’s “no path forward for a DAO to have governance legitimacy,” Hoskinson warned. His practical recommendations: core entities publicly disclose their holdings, recuse themselves from the vote, and give token holders a single question to decide — honor the October commitments, yes or no. If the community votes to honor them, the protocol should carry that out; if not, a second-stage debate can consider alternative allocations. Hoskinson was clear about his limits and the stakes. He has no authority to reverse outcomes, no control over assets already in smart contracts, and no formal governance power over the Cardano ecosystem. But perception matters: he warned that even the appearance of a trust breach could damage Liqwid’s ability to attract users and liquidity. “If people can’t trust what the core accounts are saying and when votes are taken, it creates a reality where people will just simply move to other options,” he said. If Liqwid wants to restore credibility, Hoskinson argued, the path remains open — through disclosure, recusal, and a cleaner, narrower vote. At press time, Cardano was trading at $0.29. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
T. Rowe Price Files for Actively Managed Crypto ETF That Could Include Dogecoin, Shiba Inu
T. Rowe Price files for actively managed crypto ETF that could include dogecoin and shiba inu T. Rowe Price has taken a significant step into the digital-asset market, filing an amended S-1 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for the Price Active Crypto ETF. The filing — submitted Monday — expands on an October application and lays out the fund’s potential holdings, custody plan, trading mechanics, and even the possibility of staking. What the ETF may hold The amended registration says the fund could invest in a broad set of cryptocurrencies, including: - Bitcoin (BTC) and Ether (ETH) - Solana (SOL), XRP, Cardano (ADA), Avalanche (AVAX) - Litecoin (LTC), Polkadot (DOT), Dogecoin (DOGE) - Hedera (HBAR), Bitcoin Cash (BCH), Chainlink (LINK) - Stellar (XLM), Shiba Inu (SHIB), SUI Active, concentrated approach Rather than passively tracking a single benchmark, the ETF would be actively managed and, under typical conditions, hold between five and fifteen crypto assets at any one time. Portfolio decisions would be driven by quantitative models that incorporate fundamentals, valuation and market momentum, with the stated goal of outperforming the FTSE US Listed Crypto Index. Custody, subscriptions and potential staking Anchorage Digital Bank N.A. is named as the crypto asset custodian responsible for safeguarding the fund’s tokens. Initially, the ETF would operate on a cash subscription and redemption model — investors create or redeem shares using cash rather than transferring crypto — though the filing leaves open the possibility of moving to in-kind transactions later, a structure used by some crypto ETFs. The filing also flags that the fund could pursue staking activities in the future, subject to assessments of risk, tax treatment and regulatory guidance. Staking would allow the fund to lock up certain tokens to help secure blockchains in exchange for rewards, if deemed appropriate. A major manager enters crypto T. Rowe Price, the 87-year-old asset manager with roughly $1.8 trillion in assets under management, would add this product to a growing list of regulated vehicles designed to give traditional investors crypto exposure through brokerage accounts. If approved, the Price Active Crypto ETF would stand apart from the wave of spot Bitcoin ETFs launched in the U.S. by offering an actively managed, multi-token strategy that can shift holdings as markets evolve. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Ether Surges 10% to $2,300 as ETF Inflows, BlackRock Staking Fund & Corporate Buys Fuel Rally
Ethereum stole the show Monday as ether (ETH) powered a broader crypto rebound, jumping more than 10% in 24 hours to trade above $2,300 — a six-week high. The rally significantly outpaced bitcoin’s roughly 3% gain and the CoinDesk 20 Index’s ~5% rise, signaling renewed investor appetite for assets beyond BTC. Despite the pop, ETH remains well below its highs: it’s still down more than 50% from its August record and at one point plunged about 65% from the market peak during last year’s downturn. Prices have, however, stabilized through February and March, and institutional flows appear to be turning supportive. Flows into U.S. spot ether ETFs accelerated last week, pulling in more than $160 million — the strongest weekly inflows since mid-January, according to SoSoValue. Big-name product launches are helping: BlackRock’s yield-paying Ethereum staking ETF (ETHB) has attracted more than $45 million in its first two trading days and came to market with a $104 million seed investment, per data from Farside Investors. Corporate buying has added another tailwind. BitMine (BMNR), the largest corporate holder pursuing Ethereum treasury strategies, bought nearly 122,000 ETH in the past two weeks — roughly $280 million at current prices. BMNR shares jumped 13.6% Monday, while another ETH-treasury company, Sharplink Gaming (SBET), rose about 9.1%. Market strategists say the price action may reflect rotation into ether after bitcoin dominated inflows earlier this year. “ETH’s relative strength suggests potential rotation dynamics, possibly tied to network developments and valuation appeal beyond bitcoin,” said Joel Kruger, market strategist at LMAX Group. He noted ETH has broken above a range against bitcoin where it traded since late January, “potentially marking a significant bottom for ETHBTC.” Adam Saville Brown, head of commercial at Tesseract Group, called Ethereum’s outperformance notable evidence that risk appetite is broadening across crypto: “ETH has broken back above $2,200 after weeks of underperformance. That kind of rotation into the second-largest asset suggests risk appetite is broadening, which tends to be a healthy sign.” He cautioned, though, that the rally remains vulnerable to macroeconomic cues: if Fed Chair Powell strikes a cautious tone on inflation, altcoin gains could give back more quickly than bitcoin. “The floor looks solid. The ceiling requires more than a rate hold to break through,” he said. Read more: Coverage of the Ethereum Foundation’s new mandate and the debate over its role and priorities. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Ethereum Foundation's 38‑Page Mandate Divides Community Over Stewardship vs. Market Push
The Ethereum Foundation’s newly released 38-page mandate has ignited a lively debate over what the organization should be — and what role it ought to play as Ethereum scales and attracts institutional attention. Released Friday as a “constitutional” guide to the foundation’s mission and principles, the document paints the EF as a neutral steward of Ethereum: a guardian of a decentralized, resilient base layer that supports the protocol and funds public goods across the ecosystem. It deliberately frames the foundation as a coordinator of research, funding and ecosystem health rather than a centralized governing body. That framing arrived at a sensitive time. Ethereum has matured into one of crypto’s largest ecosystems, the foundation has seen leadership shifts, and institutional interest in blockchains is rising. The mandate’s publication sparked sharply divided responses across social media over the weekend. Critics: too philosophical, not pragmatic enough Detractors argue the mandate leans into ideology while sidestepping the practical work needed to help Ethereum win real-world adoption and institutional deployments. Dankrad Feist, a former EF researcher and important contributor to Ethereum’s scaling roadmap, said the document doesn’t wrestle with day-to-day business development questions or the ecosystem’s shortage of voices prioritizing real-world usage—particularly inside the biweekly “all core developers” (ACD) call. Yuga Cohler, an engineer at Coinbase, warned the EF risks doubling down on cypherpunk ideals just as institutions begin coming on-chain, sometimes via competing networks. He compared it to a company obsessing over internal architecture while rivals seize market share, arguing an EF “determined to win” should prioritize making Ethereum the best chain for finance. Some critics also flagged the mandate as potentially entrenching the foundation’s soft influence without clarifying responsibilities or accountability. Supporters: a needed reminder of stewardship and values Supporters framed the mandate as a timely reaffirmation of the EF’s nonprofit, stewardship role and of the long-standing principle that the core layer should remain minimal, open and permissionless. Chris Perkins, president and managing partner at CoinFund, called the document a sensible articulation of the EF’s nonprofit mission and praised its focus on what he summarized as CROPS — censorship resistance, open source, privacy and security. Taylor Monahan, a former Metamask employee and longtime contributor, pushed back on demands that the EF act like a product company. She emphasized that users interact with products built on top of blockchains, and that the EF’s role is to maintain the platform that allows permissionless innovation. Infrastructure firms echoed that sentiment. Nethermind, a client implementation developer, said the mandate codifies the kinds of properties institutional procurement teams already evaluate—operational resilience (security), data protection (privacy), no vendor lock-in (open source), and platform neutrality (censorship resistance)—and framed the EF as protecting the protocol while firms like Nethermind build what institutions deploy on top of it. What this debate reveals Beyond the immediate reactions, the mandate has raised a deeper, unresolved question about Ethereum’s identity: as the network becomes integral to finance and digital infrastructure, who speaks for it, who makes trade-offs, and how should leadership evolve? The EF’s mandate clearly reasserts a philosophy of minimalism at the base layer—prioritizing censorship resistance, open-source development, privacy and security. For proponents, that clarity is overdue and stabilizing. For critics, it’s not enough: if Ethereum is to compete for institutional capital and broader real-world usage, they argue, the ecosystem needs more overt coordination on business development, product-market fit, and an active strategy to win market share. The mandate may have set the philosophical compass. Now the community will continue to debate whether that compass points to the pragmatic leadership Ethereum needs — or simply consolidates the status quo at a pivotal moment in the network’s evolution. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Circle Stock Soars 100% as USDC, Tokenization and AI Payments Fuel Rally
Circle's stock has exploded into one of crypto’s hottest trades — and the reasons go beyond simple market speculation. What happened - Shares of Circle (CRCL) have jumped more than 100% over the past month, hitting $124.37 after an 8% gain on Monday. That outpaced other crypto-linked names: MicroStrategy (MSTR) rose about 23% and Coinbase (COIN) roughly 8.5% over the same period. - The rally has been fueled by a string of bullish analyst moves. Clear Street upgraded Circle to Buy (raising its price target to $136 from $92) and Mizuho lifted its target to $120 from $100. Even longtime skeptic Ed Engel of Compass Point moved to Neutral from Sell in January. Seaport Global is the most aggressive, carrying a $280 target, per FactSet. Why investors are piling in - Core business strength: Circle’s revenue is closely tied to USDC, its dollar-pegged stablecoin. A sizable slice of income comes from interest on the reserves that back USDC — meaning higher interest rates can boost earnings for the company. - Macro tailwinds: Geopolitical tensions (notably in Iran) and rising oil prices have stoked fears of stickier inflation and pushed back bets on Federal Reserve rate cuts. That environment can benefit firms like Circle that earn interest income on reserves. - Resilient demand: Unlike speculative tokens, stablecoin usage often grows even in down markets. Clear Street notes that while total crypto market cap has dropped about 44% since October 2025, USDC’s market cap has held steady — underscoring its role as payments and settlement infrastructure rather than a speculative asset. Bigger structural trends lifting USDC (and Circle) - Tokenization of financial assets: Bringing Treasuries, credit funds and other instruments on-chain has driven growing use of stablecoins for subscriptions, redemptions and payments. Clear Street estimates tokenized assets rose from about $1.5 billion in early 2023 to roughly $26.5 billion today. BlackRock’s tokenized Treasury fund BUIDL has topped $2 billion since its 2024 launch and commonly uses USDC. - Prediction markets and payments: Platforms like Polymarket processed more than $22 billion in trading volume in 2025, much of it settled in USDC. - AI-driven commerce: Autonomous software agents increasingly need programmable, fast payment rails to buy data, services and compute. Early data cited by analysts shows roughly 98% of AI-agent payments are settling in USDC — a potential long-term growth vector. Regulatory backdrop - Legislative clarity could accelerate institutional adoption. Analysts say the odds of U.S. crypto legislation moving forward have improved after President Trump expressed support for the proposed CLARITY Act, which aims to clarify digital-asset oversight. Bottom line What felt like a conservative, “boring” corner of crypto — a company built around a dollar-pegged stablecoin — has become a high-flying stock thanks to rising analyst optimism, macro dynamics, and structural shifts like tokenization and AI payments. As Clear Street’s Lau put it, “We believe the Street has under-estimated the impact of tokenization, prediction markets, war and AI on USDC.” Whether the rally continues will depend on how those trends evolve and how macro rates and regulation play out. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
Ethereum Rockets 8.8%, Lifts CoinDesk 20 Up 5.1% as All 20 Assets Climb
Headline: Ethereum surge lifts CoinDesk 20 — index jumps 5.1% as all 20 assets climb CoinDesk Indices’ daily market update shows a broad upswing across the CoinDesk 20. The index is currently trading at 2,140.46, up 5.1% (an increase of 104.17 points) since 4 p.m. ET on Friday — and every asset in the basket is trading higher. Top movers - Ethereum (ETH): +8.8% — the strongest performer in the group. - Polkadot (DOT): +8.5%. Lagging, but still positive - Uniswap (UNI): +0.9%. - Bitcoin Cash (BCH): +2.5%. The CoinDesk 20 is a broad-based index that is traded on multiple platforms across several regions globally. CoinDesk Indices provides this daily snapshot to highlight leaders and laggards within the benchmark. Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news