Zimbabwe’s central bank has moved to bring the country’s crypto sector into the formal regulatory fold. Statutory Instrument 99 of 2026 puts cryptocurrency businesses under the Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe’s (RBZ) anti-money laundering unit and establishes a clear registration and compliance regime for virtual asset service providers (VASPs).
What’s new
- Any firm that buys, sells, transfers, stores or otherwise helps customers access digital assets must register as a VASP with the RBZ.
- The rules require local legal recognition before companies can operate domestically, closing a long-standing legal gap that followed the central bank’s 2018 order forbidding banks from processing crypto transactions.
Key compliance rules
- Firms must set up a legally registered domestic subsidiary.
- Annual registration fee: $500.
- Directors are subject to background checks prior to approval.
- The “travel rule” applies: qualifying transfers require collection and sharing of transaction data among providers.
- RBZ’s AML arm will supervise the registered entities, integrating crypto activity into existing national financial surveillance systems.
Scope and approach
The statutory instrument is technology-neutral: decentralization alone does not exempt an operator from responsibility. Entities capable of changing smart contracts, routing funds or setting transaction fees are considered to exert control and therefore fall within the regulatory remit. That language effectively brings some decentralized finance (DeFi) structures under oversight by focusing on control rather than project labels.
Why now
Reports link the move to Zimbabwe’s desire to avoid a grey-listing by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and to shore up anti-money-laundering and financial-crime compliance. Tech news outlet Techzim framed S.I.99 as a way for Zimbabwe to “show its homework” to global watchdogs. Importantly, the regulations emphasize financial-crime controls rather than giving cryptocurrencies sovereign or legal-tender status.
Implications
- For established operators, the rules create a formal path to legal operation and reduce the risk of sudden enforcement shocks.
- For local fintech startups and DeFi projects, the new compliance burdens — domestic incorporation, fees, checks and data-sharing obligations — could raise operating costs and complexity.
- For regulators and international partners, the RBZ now has clearer leverage to monitor and police crypto-related flows in line with national AML frameworks.
Bottom line
S.I.99 brings Zimbabwe’s crypto market under explicit RBZ oversight and aligns it with mainstream financial-crime controls. The framework ends years of uncertainty, but also expands the compliance perimeter to some decentralized setups — signaling that the RBZ intends to regulate based on control and risk, not buzzwords.
Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
