OpenClaw’s creator, Peter Steinberger, has instituted a strict “no crypto mention whatsoever” rule across the project’s Discord after a high-profile impersonation and token scam during the project’s recent rebrand.
What happened
- A user was removed from OpenClaw’s Discord after referencing Bitcoin block height as a timing mechanism in a technical discussion. The user later posted the removal on X (formerly Twitter).
- Steinberger defended the decision, saying members agree to “strict server rules” upon joining and that the community enforces a blanket ban on any cryptocurrency mentions — not just promotional posts or token talk. He later offered to restore the user’s access after the user emailed their username.
Why the ban exists
- The zero-tolerance policy stems from a scam that erupted during OpenClaw’s rebrand. After a trademark notice compelled Steinberger to change the project’s name, opportunistic attackers grabbed the project’s abandoned social handles during the transition window.
- Those accounts were used to promote a Solana-based token called $CLAWD. The token shot to roughly $16 million in market capitalization before collapsing by more than 90% after Steinberger publicly disavowed any involvement.
- Early buyers accused Steinberger of orchestrating a pump-and-dump, which he denied, reiterating that he would never launch a cryptocurrency and that any token claiming association with him was fraudulent.
Wider security problems discovered
- Security researchers later identified hundreds of exposed OpenClaw instances on the internet and dozens of malicious plugins, many designed to target crypto traders — underscoring how quickly third-party infrastructure gaps and account transitions can be exploited.
Bottom line
OpenClaw’s blanket ban on crypto references is a defensive move driven by a recent impersonation scam and the real-world losses it caused. While the policy has caught even purely technical mentions — such as using Bitcoin block height for timing — the team says it prefers blunt prevention over the risk of another costly impersonation event.
Read more AI-generated news on: undefined/news
